It’s Time to Re-Re-Re-Meet the Muppets

In a nod to the original “Muppet Show,” “Muppets Now” features sketches set at Muppet Labs. Among the inventions tested there is the Infern-O-Matic, which reduces everyday items to piles of ashes.
In a nod to the original “Muppet Show,” “Muppets Now” features sketches set at Muppet Labs. Among the inventions tested there is the Infern-O-Matic, which reduces everyday items to piles of ashes.
TT

It’s Time to Re-Re-Re-Meet the Muppets

In a nod to the original “Muppet Show,” “Muppets Now” features sketches set at Muppet Labs. Among the inventions tested there is the Infern-O-Matic, which reduces everyday items to piles of ashes.
In a nod to the original “Muppet Show,” “Muppets Now” features sketches set at Muppet Labs. Among the inventions tested there is the Infern-O-Matic, which reduces everyday items to piles of ashes.

At the dawn of “The Muppet Show” in the late 1970s, a visit to the Muppet Labs consisted of watching its nebbishy proprietor, Dr. Bunsen Honeydew, demonstrate misbegotten inventions like an exploding hat or a self-destructing necktie with a brief burst of pyrotechnics, a canned explosion sound and a puff of smoke.

Today, a return visit to those labs on the Disney+ series “Muppets Now” features Honeydew and his agitated assistant, Beaker, using a homemade device called the Infern-O-Matic to reduce everyday items — a carton of eggs, a wall clock, a guitar — to smoldering piles of ashes.

If this scene from “Muppets Now” feels manic and combustible — and even a bit familiar — that is by design: as Leigh Slaughter, vice president of the Muppets Studio, explained recently, she and her colleagues are hopeful that this series will conjure up “that true Muppet anarchy — that complete chaos.”

She added: “If they’re going to take on real-world science, we thought, we have to burn things. We have to drop things. We have to blow things up.”

“Muppets Now,” a six-episode series that debuts on July 31, is both Disney’s attempt to bring those familiar, fuzzy faces to its streaming service and a parody of internet content. Its segments feature characters like Miss Piggy and the Swedish Chef in rapid-fire comedy sketches that lampoon popular online formats.

The new series also strives to reconnect the Muppets with the disorderly sensibility they embodied in the era of “The Muppet Show” and get back to basics after other recent efforts to reboot the characters fizzled out.

“The thinking is to stop trying so hard to be like everybody else and just be the Muppets,” said Bill Barretta, a veteran Muppet performer and an executive producer of “Muppets Now.” “Let’s celebrate the fact that they all have to deal with each other and just be silly and play and entertain again.”

Nearly 45 years after its debut, “The Muppet Show” (which originally ran in syndication from 1976 to 1981) remains a high-water mark for the franchise. Fueled by the subversive imagination of the Muppets creator, Jim Henson, and a small band of like-minded performers and writers, it was a backstage showbiz satire bolstered by kitschy celebrity hosts and a madcap attitude inherited from sketch shows like “Saturday Night Live” (where the Muppets had previously appeared) and “Monty Python’s Flying Circus.”

The popularity of “The Muppet Show” paved the way for hit films like “The Muppet Movie” (1979) which tempered the mayhem of the TV series with a sentimental streak and endeared founding performers like Henson and Frank Oz to a generation of viewers.

But keeping the Muppets relevant to modern audiences has proved elusive, particularly since they were acquired by Disney in 2004. (The Muppet characters created for “Sesame Street” remain the property of Sesame Workshop, a nonprofit organization, while other shows like “Fraggle Rock” are owned by the Jim Henson Company.)

A 2011 film, “The Muppets,” written by Nicholas Stoller and Jason Segel (“Forgetting Sarah Marshall”) was a critical and commercial hit that won an Academy Award for its song “Man or Muppet,” written by Bret McKenzie. But a 2014 follow-up, “Muppets Most Wanted,” was a disappointment and quickly curtailed the revival.

In 2015, an ABC sitcom called “The Muppets” drew attention for its single-camera mockumentary style (similar to shows like “The Office”) and a plotline in which Kermit and Miss Piggy broke up. But the show was not well-received; it was troubled by staff changes and canceled after one season.

Barretta, who plays Muppets like Rowlf the Dog and Pepe the King Prawn, said the approach of that sitcom “was too much, too stereotypical of the characters.”

Dan Silver, who is vice president of original unscripted content for Disney+, agreed that serialized plot twists were not necessarily going to bring viewers back to the Muppets. “Sometimes it’s not about if Piggy and Kermit are going to get together,” he said. “It’s about, how does that make something funny in a skit?”

The Muppets have had other contemporary successes that seemed to point to a path forward, including a 2009 viral video in which they performed Queen’s pop-rock operetta “Bohemian Rhapsody,” and a live show presented at the Hollywood Bowl (in 2017) and London’s O2 Arena (in 2018).

Eric Jacobson, a Muppets performer who now plays Fozzie and Miss Piggy, said that the live concerts were a crucial step in steering the puppet troupe back to its fundamental values.

“They were very collaborative experiences,” Jacobson said of the shows, which included classic Muppets numbers like “Mahna Mahna” and “Rainbow Connection.”

“There was a real conscious effort to go back to the Muppets’ roots, to play up the personalities and that sense of abandon that people really respond to,” he added.

Last year, Disney announced that it was working with the Muppets Studio to create a new sketch show. (Another planned Muppets series being prepared by Adam Horowitz and Edward Kitsis of “Once Upon a Time” and Josh Gad of “Frozen” was halted around this time amid creative differences.)

Silver, the Disney+ executive, said that “Muppets Now” should reflect the elasticity of the underlying property. Like Mickey Mouse or the Simpsons, he said, the Muppets are meant to “live among us — they’re not a nostalgia play, they just exist in whatever time we’re in.”

What makes the Muppets work, he said, can be found in something as rudimentary as the early test footage for “The Muppet Movie” that shows Henson and Oz roaming the countryside as they ad-lib dialogue for Kermit the Frog, Miss Piggy and Fozzie Bear.

“It’s just Jim and Frank figuring out, how do you put them in the real world outside a studio?” Silver said. “It’s completely improvised and it’s hilarious. The whole framework was there. It just needed to be appropriated into today.”

The structure of “Muppets Now,” he said, was also suggested by going back to the early days and taking a cue from the original “Muppet Show,” which was in part a sendup of comedy-variety programs of the 1960s and 70s. As Silver put it: “If ‘The Muppet Show’ was a subversion of Sonny and Cher and Ed Sullivan, what would that be in this day and age? And the answer is YouTube.”

Taking the programming formats of streaming video and populating them with its antic characters, “Muppets Now” gives us segments like a beauty and lifestyle video blog hosted by Miss Piggy; a cooking competition with the Swedish Chef; and a high-octane Muppet Labs science test with Dr. Honeydew and Beaker.

Most of the sketches were filmed last summer, amid a process that the Muppet performers said was collaborative and open to a wide range of inputs.

“When we’re on set, there is discussion among the Muppet performers with the writer and the producer and director,” said Matt Vogel, who plays Kermit the Frog.

“We’ll talk it through before we shoot something,” Vogel said, “and even when we’re shooting things, the Muppet performers are pretty adept at ad-libbing as long as it’s character-appropriate.”

Still, some remaining footage for interstitial segments was produced during the coronavirus pandemic. This required performers to record themselves at home and required spouses, partners and children to lend a hand or keep quiet during their creation.

The New York Times



C’mon Get Happy, Joker Is Back (This Time with Lady Gaga)

 This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows Joaquin Phoenix, left, and Lady Gaga in a scene from "Joker: Folie à Deux." (Niko Tavernise/Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)
This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows Joaquin Phoenix, left, and Lady Gaga in a scene from "Joker: Folie à Deux." (Niko Tavernise/Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)
TT

C’mon Get Happy, Joker Is Back (This Time with Lady Gaga)

 This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows Joaquin Phoenix, left, and Lady Gaga in a scene from "Joker: Folie à Deux." (Niko Tavernise/Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)
This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows Joaquin Phoenix, left, and Lady Gaga in a scene from "Joker: Folie à Deux." (Niko Tavernise/Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)

“Joker” is a hard act to follow. Todd Phillips’ dark, Scorsese-inspired character study about the Batman villain made over a billion dollars at the box office, won Joaquin Phoenix his first Oscar, dominated the cultural discourse for months and created a new movie landmark.

It wasn’t for everyone, but it got under people’s skin.

Knowing that it was a fool’s errand to try to do it again, Phillips and Phoenix pivoted, or rather, pirouetted into what would become “Joker: Folie à Deux.” The dark and fantastical musical journey goes deeper into the mind of Arthur Fleck as he awaits trial for murder and falls in love with a fellow Arkham inmate, Lee, played by Lady Gaga. There is singing, dancing and mayhem.

If Phillips and Phoenix have learned anything over the years, it’s that the scarier something is, the better. So once again they rebelled against expectations and went for broke with something that’s already sharply divided critics.

As with the first, audiences will get to decide for themselves when it opens in theaters on Oct. 4.

“HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET JOAQUIN PHOENIX TO DO A SEQUEL?” Any comic book movie that makes a billion dollars is going to have the sequel talk. But with “Joker” it was never a given that it would go anywhere: Joaquin Phoenix doesn’t do sequels. Yet it turned out, Phoenix wasn’t quite done with Arthur Fleck yet either.

During the first, the actor wondered what this character would look like in different situations. He and the on-set photographer mocked up classic movie posters, like “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” and “Yentl” with the Joker in them and showed them to Phillips.

“Sometimes you’re just done with something and other times you have an ongoing interest,” Phoenix said. “There was just more to explore. ... I just felt like we weren’t done.”

So Phillips and his co-writer Scott Silver got to work on a new script, one that leaned into the music in Arthur Fleck’s head. Then his dreary Arkham life turns to Technicolor when he meets and falls for Lee, a Joker superfan.

“Joaquin Phoenix is not going to do a line drive. He’s not going to do something that’s fan service,” Phillips said. “He wanted to be as scared as he was with the first movie. So, we tried to make something that is as audacious and out there and hopefully people get it.”

LADY GAGA FINDS LEE’S VOICE, AND LOSES HER OWN One decision that’s already sparking debate is casting someone with a voice like Lady Gaga’s and not using that instrument to its full power. Phillips, who was a producer on “A Star is Born,” wanted someone who “brought music with them.” But Lee isn’t a singer.

“Singing is so second nature to me, and making music and performing on stage is so inside of me. Especially this music,” Gaga said. “I worked extensively on untraining myself for this movie and throwing away as much as I could all the time to make sure I was never locking into what I do. I had to really kind of erase it all.”

Phoenix, who wasn't quite sure what it would be like working with someone who has such a larger-than-life superstar persona, found Gaga to be refreshingly unpretentious and available. And as an actor, he admired her commitment to the character.

“Her power is in singing and singing a particular way,” he said. “For her to sacrifice that through character, to do something that people would call a musical, but to not be performing it in the way that would sound best as a singer but to approach it from the character was a very difficult process. I was really impressed with her willingness to do that.”

In addition to writing a “waltz that falls apart” for the film, Gaga is releasing a companion album, “Harlequin” on Friday with song titles including “Oh, When the Saints,” “World on a String,” “If My Friends Could See Me Now” and “That’s Life."

SORRY PUDDIN’, THIS AIN’T MARGOT ROBBIE’S HARLEY QUINN Much like Phoenix’s Joker isn’t Heath Ledger’s or Jack Nicholson’s, Gaga’s Lee is not the Harley Quinn of “Birds of Prey.”

“We’re never going to outdo what Margot Robbie did,” Phillips said. “You have to do something 180 degrees in the other direction.”

Sure, Lee will still casually light something on fire to get some time alone with Joker, but the tumult is more internal. And Gaga threw herself into making Lee something new: A real person, grounded in a reality that came before her.

“I spent a lot of my time on developing her inner life (which) for me had a lot to do with her storm and what thing was always making her about to explode,” Gaga said. “There’s a particular kind of danger that she carries with her, but it’s inside and it’s kind of explosive.”

“DO YOU JUST WANT A BRUTE?” Brendan Gleeson didn’t have much hesitation about joining the ensemble. He’d worked with Phoenix before on “The Village” and was in awe of what he’d done on the first movie.

“He has an absolute relentless integrity and curiosity and drive,” Gleeson said. “He won’t just plough the same furrow for its own sake.”

But he also didn’t want to play the simple version of an Arkham prison guard.

“I said, look, do you just want a brute? Because I’m not sure I just want to do a brute,” Gleeson said. “He wanted something more. We tried to find layers in this guy.”

CREATING MAYHEM Anyone who has worked with Phoenix knows that he likes to keep things fresh. That may mean something as small as changing the location of a prop or as big as throwing out choreography that you’ve been rehearsing for months at the last minute.

“I think we both love mayhem and not just in movies but on the set,” Phillips said. “It had to feel like anything can happen.”

With the crew 95% the same as the first, everyone was ready to be flexible. Gaga, too, dove right in, suggesting that they sing live on camera.

“It changed the whole making of the film,” Phillips said. “We were not only singing live, we were singing live differently every take.”

THAT’S ENTERTAINMENT? Since Arthur killed Robert De Niro’s talk show host Murray Franklin on live television in the first film, he’s become a kind of icon and curiosity thanks in no small part to an oft referenced, but never seen, television movie that was made about him. Now, the trial is going to be televised as well.

“Underneath it all, there’s this idea of corruption and how everything is corrupt in the system, from the prison system to the judicial system to the idea of entertainment, quite frankly,” Phillips said. “This idea that in the States at least, everything is entertainment. A court trial could be entertainment, and a presidential election can be entertainment. So, if that’s true, what is entertainment?”

NO LONGER A COMPLETE WILD CARD It’s easier to be to the insurgent, not the incumbent, Phillips said. Although a Joker film is never going to fly completely under the radar, the spotlight is undoubtedly more intense this time around.

“You do feel like you have a larger target on your back,” Phillips said.

While much of the film was made on Warner Bros. soundstages in Los Angeles, the production did go back to New York to film again on the Bronx staircase (which now come up on Google Maps as the Joker Stairs) and outside a Manhattan courthouse. The production staged a massive protest scene, with Gaga, almost concurrently with the media frenzy around the Donald Trump hush money trial as if there weren’t enough eyes on them already.

Some are also handwringing about the sequel’s bigger budget and whether it can match the success of the first. But Phillips has learned to take it in stride.

“There’s a different amount of pressure, but that just comes with making movies,” he said. “You can’t please everybody and you just kind of go for it.”

Gleeson has an even sunnier outlook.

“It has kind of arthouse movie integrity on a blockbuster scale. It’s great news for cinema, is the way I look on it,” Gleeson said. “If these event movies can continue to have depth and can be so conflicting like this one, is we needn’t worry about the future of cinema.”

SO, IS IT A MUSICAL? One thing Phillips didn’t mean to do was ignite a discourse about what is and isn’t a musical. He’s just trying to manage expectations.

“People go, ‘what do you mean it’s not a musical?’ And it is a musical. It has all the elements of a musical. But I guess what I mean by it is all the musicals I’ve seen leave me happy at the end for the most part, ‘Umbrellas of Cherbourg’ not being one of them. This has so much sadness in it that I just didn’t want to be misleading to people.”