Lebanese Parties Differ over Appointment of New PM, Form of Govt.

US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale and US Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea visit the site of a massive explosion at Beirut's port, Lebanon August 15, 2020. (Reuters)
US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale and US Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea visit the site of a massive explosion at Beirut's port, Lebanon August 15, 2020. (Reuters)
TT

Lebanese Parties Differ over Appointment of New PM, Form of Govt.

US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale and US Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea visit the site of a massive explosion at Beirut's port, Lebanon August 15, 2020. (Reuters)
US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale and US Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea visit the site of a massive explosion at Beirut's port, Lebanon August 15, 2020. (Reuters)

Barely two weeks have past since the cataclysmic blast at Beirut port and Lebanese political parties have gone back to their old ways and are bickering over the formation of a new government and appointment of new prime minister.

Beirut has seen a flurry of diplomatic activity in wake of the blast that devastated the capital. French President Emmanuel Macron, US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif have all visited Beirut, leaving in their wake differences among political parties over the new cabinet lineup and premier.

The disputes will likely delay the announcement of a date for parliamentary consultations to name a new PM. They may take place even after Macron’s expected return to Beirut on September 1.

Ministerial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the delay was inevitable because political parties are keen on reaching an agreement on the form of the government before the naming of a new premier. However, each party has its own vision of how the new cabinet should look like, which will in turn lead to weeks, if not months, of political bickering given past experiences.

Contacts in the past 48 hours have not led to any breakthrough over an agreement on a PM. An agreement is unlikely in the next two weeks and Macron will return to Lebanon with very little political progress being made on the ground.

Macron had called for the formation of a national unity government.

President Michel Aoun advocates this call, said the sources. They explained that he would prefer the participation of all main political parties so that they could all take part in reform and the fight against corruption. A party that chooses not to be part of this government would have taken the decision to marginalize itself.

The strongest candidates to head the new cabinet are former PM Saad Hariri and Ambassador Nawwaf Salam. Former minister Khaled Qabbani is the latest name to be thrown in. Informed sources said that discussions are mainly focusing on the reappointment of Hariri, who is clearly favored by the United States and France, said the sources.

They added that as it stands, however, an agreement over a new PM will not take place any time soon. The opposition camp, specifically the Progressive Socialist Party, Lebanese Forces and Hariri’s Mustaqbal Movement, is divided among itself over the form of the new cabinet. The divisions came to the fore after the Mustaqbal Movement and PSP MPs had agreed to resign from parliament after the port blast, but decided against it after Macron’s visit.

The sources added that disputes over the government are also related to the next presidential elections, which are set for 2022.

Despite the internal divisions, the opposition has announced its support for a neutral government. The sources said that this demand is not viable given the Sunni sect’s refusal to repeat the same experience of the Hassan Diab cabinet, which quit on Monday over the blast. The Sunni camp is therefore, leaning towards renaming Hariri.

The sources noted that Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Gebran Bassil has toned down his rhetoric in wake of Macron’s visit, adding that the solution may lie in the formation of a transitional government headed by Hariri. It will include FPM representatives, but exclude Bassil, and non-partisan officials chosen by Hezbollah.

Aide to PSP chief Walid Jumblatt, Rami Rayyes told Asharq Al-Awsat that no one was under the illusion that process of forming a new government will be easy.

He cited “major complications” over its “form, nature, composition and size” especially since internal and foreign contacts are at a standstill.

On Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah’s rejection of a neutral government, he said: “The party has long opposed neutral cabinets for its own well-known interests and political calculations. Nothing has changed in this regard.”



Sudan Rejects UN Call for 'Impartial' Force to Protect Civilians

Smoke rises in Omdurman, near Halfaya Bridge, during clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the army as seen from Khartoum North, Sudan April 15, 2023. REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah
Smoke rises in Omdurman, near Halfaya Bridge, during clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the army as seen from Khartoum North, Sudan April 15, 2023. REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah
TT

Sudan Rejects UN Call for 'Impartial' Force to Protect Civilians

Smoke rises in Omdurman, near Halfaya Bridge, during clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the army as seen from Khartoum North, Sudan April 15, 2023. REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah
Smoke rises in Omdurman, near Halfaya Bridge, during clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the army as seen from Khartoum North, Sudan April 15, 2023. REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah

Sudan has rejected a call by UN experts for the deployment of an "independent and impartial force" to protect millions of civilians driven from their homes by more than a year of war.

The conflict since April last year, pitting the army against Rapid Support Forces, has killed tens of thousands of people and triggered one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.

The independent UN experts said Friday their fact-finding mission had uncovered "harrowing" violations by both sides, "which may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity".

They called for "an independent and impartial force with a mandate to safeguard civilians" to be deployed "without delay".

The Sudanese foreign ministry, which is loyal to the army under General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, said in a statement late Saturday that "the Sudanese government rejects in their entirety the recommendations of the UN mission."

It called the UN Human Rights Council, which created the fact-finding mission last year, "a political and illegal body", and the panel's recommendations "a flagrant violation of their mandate".

According to AFP, the UN experts said eight million civilians have been displaced and another two million people have fled to neighboring countries.

More than 25 million people -- upwards of half the country's population -- face acute food shortages.

World Health Organization chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, on a visit to Sudan on Sunday, said: "The scale of the emergency is shocking, as is the insufficient action being taken to curtail the conflict and respond to the suffering it is causing."

In Port Sudan, where government offices and the United Nations have relocated to due to the intense fighting in the capital Khartoum, Tedros called on the "world to wake up and help Sudan out of the nightmare it is living through".

The Sudanese foreign ministry statement accused the Rapid Support Forces, led by Burhan's former deputy Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, of "systematically targeting civilians and civilian institutions".

"The protection of civilians remains an absolute priority for the Sudanese government," it said.

The statement added that the UN Human Rights Council's role should be "to support the national process, rather than seek to impose a different exterior mechanism".

It also rejected the experts' call for an arms embargo.