Lebanese Parties Differ over Appointment of New PM, Form of Govt.

US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale and US Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea visit the site of a massive explosion at Beirut's port, Lebanon August 15, 2020. (Reuters)
US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale and US Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea visit the site of a massive explosion at Beirut's port, Lebanon August 15, 2020. (Reuters)
TT

Lebanese Parties Differ over Appointment of New PM, Form of Govt.

US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale and US Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea visit the site of a massive explosion at Beirut's port, Lebanon August 15, 2020. (Reuters)
US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale and US Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea visit the site of a massive explosion at Beirut's port, Lebanon August 15, 2020. (Reuters)

Barely two weeks have past since the cataclysmic blast at Beirut port and Lebanese political parties have gone back to their old ways and are bickering over the formation of a new government and appointment of new prime minister.

Beirut has seen a flurry of diplomatic activity in wake of the blast that devastated the capital. French President Emmanuel Macron, US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif have all visited Beirut, leaving in their wake differences among political parties over the new cabinet lineup and premier.

The disputes will likely delay the announcement of a date for parliamentary consultations to name a new PM. They may take place even after Macron’s expected return to Beirut on September 1.

Ministerial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the delay was inevitable because political parties are keen on reaching an agreement on the form of the government before the naming of a new premier. However, each party has its own vision of how the new cabinet should look like, which will in turn lead to weeks, if not months, of political bickering given past experiences.

Contacts in the past 48 hours have not led to any breakthrough over an agreement on a PM. An agreement is unlikely in the next two weeks and Macron will return to Lebanon with very little political progress being made on the ground.

Macron had called for the formation of a national unity government.

President Michel Aoun advocates this call, said the sources. They explained that he would prefer the participation of all main political parties so that they could all take part in reform and the fight against corruption. A party that chooses not to be part of this government would have taken the decision to marginalize itself.

The strongest candidates to head the new cabinet are former PM Saad Hariri and Ambassador Nawwaf Salam. Former minister Khaled Qabbani is the latest name to be thrown in. Informed sources said that discussions are mainly focusing on the reappointment of Hariri, who is clearly favored by the United States and France, said the sources.

They added that as it stands, however, an agreement over a new PM will not take place any time soon. The opposition camp, specifically the Progressive Socialist Party, Lebanese Forces and Hariri’s Mustaqbal Movement, is divided among itself over the form of the new cabinet. The divisions came to the fore after the Mustaqbal Movement and PSP MPs had agreed to resign from parliament after the port blast, but decided against it after Macron’s visit.

The sources added that disputes over the government are also related to the next presidential elections, which are set for 2022.

Despite the internal divisions, the opposition has announced its support for a neutral government. The sources said that this demand is not viable given the Sunni sect’s refusal to repeat the same experience of the Hassan Diab cabinet, which quit on Monday over the blast. The Sunni camp is therefore, leaning towards renaming Hariri.

The sources noted that Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Gebran Bassil has toned down his rhetoric in wake of Macron’s visit, adding that the solution may lie in the formation of a transitional government headed by Hariri. It will include FPM representatives, but exclude Bassil, and non-partisan officials chosen by Hezbollah.

Aide to PSP chief Walid Jumblatt, Rami Rayyes told Asharq Al-Awsat that no one was under the illusion that process of forming a new government will be easy.

He cited “major complications” over its “form, nature, composition and size” especially since internal and foreign contacts are at a standstill.

On Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah’s rejection of a neutral government, he said: “The party has long opposed neutral cabinets for its own well-known interests and political calculations. Nothing has changed in this regard.”



Taqaddum Coordinating Body Supports Sudan Fact-Finding Commission Report

A Sudanese army force patrols a street in Khartoum (AFP file photo)
A Sudanese army force patrols a street in Khartoum (AFP file photo)
TT

Taqaddum Coordinating Body Supports Sudan Fact-Finding Commission Report

A Sudanese army force patrols a street in Khartoum (AFP file photo)
A Sudanese army force patrols a street in Khartoum (AFP file photo)

The Coordinating Body of Democratic Civil Forces (Taqaddum) reaffirmed its full support on Sunday for the recommendations issued by the independent international fact-finding mission on Sudan. These recommendations include the urgent deployment of international forces to protect civilians in the country.

Taqaddum, the largest political coalition in Sudan, welcomed the report’s documentation of grave violations committed by both sides of the conflict—the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), along with their allied forces.

“We fully support all measures aimed at ending the war, protecting civilians, delivering humanitarian aid, ensuring justice, and providing redress to victims...” the coalition said in a statement.

The statement called for immediate steps to halt crimes. It urged the UN Human Rights Council to extend the mandate of the fact-finding mission and stressed the importance of increasing collaboration with Sudan’s democratic civil forces to document violations and recommend solutions to alleviate civilian suffering.

Taqaddum further asserted that civilian protection can only be achieved through an immediate cessation of hostilities and a mutually agreed-upon monitoring mechanism between the warring parties.

Meanwhile, the Sudanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, based in Port Sudan, issued a statement late Saturday rejecting the fact-finding mission’s recommendations.

The ministry accused the mission of engaging in propaganda ahead of the Human Rights Council’s deliberations, with the aim of influencing member states to extend the mission’s mandate for political purposes.

In its first report last Friday, the international fact-finding mission announced that both parties to the conflict had committed horrific human rights violations and international crimes that constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The report stated that Sudanese Armed Forces, RSF, and their allied forces were responsible for widespread abuses, including indiscriminate airstrikes, shelling of civilian areas, and attacks on schools, hospitals, communication infrastructure, and water and electricity supplies.

Additionally, the report noted that warring factions used sexual violence, including rape, and engaged in arbitrary detention, torture, and mistreatment, which could amount to war crimes.

International human rights experts expect the deployment of forces to protect civilians to be discussed during the Human Rights Council’s upcoming session on Tuesday. The matter could also be referred to the UN General Assembly or the UN Security Council.

A senior UN official told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Sudanese government delegation would likely oppose extending the mission’s mandate. However, the official did not anticipate objections from Russia or China regarding the report’s findings on international investigations into crimes committed by both sides of the conflict.

The official further predicted broad consensus among council members to renew the mission’s mandate.

According to the mission, the report is based on investigations and field visits to Chad, Kenya, and Uganda, as well as testimony from more than 182 survivors, family members, and eyewitnesses. It also involved extensive consultations with experts and civil society organizations.

The conflict in Sudan has resulted in tens of thousands of civilian casualties and the displacement of nearly eight million people within the country, while over two million have sought refuge in neighboring countries.

The fact-finding committee was established by a UN Human Rights Council resolution in October last year to investigate alleged human rights violations and breaches of international humanitarian law.