Egypt, Ethiopia, Sudan Exchange Proposals on GERD’s Filling

Excavators dredge the River Nile as part of a clean up operation in Cairo as Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan meet for talks over disputed Nile dam, Egypt, December 3, 2019. (Reuters)
Excavators dredge the River Nile as part of a clean up operation in Cairo as Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan meet for talks over disputed Nile dam, Egypt, December 3, 2019. (Reuters)
TT

Egypt, Ethiopia, Sudan Exchange Proposals on GERD’s Filling

Excavators dredge the River Nile as part of a clean up operation in Cairo as Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan meet for talks over disputed Nile dam, Egypt, December 3, 2019. (Reuters)
Excavators dredge the River Nile as part of a clean up operation in Cairo as Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan meet for talks over disputed Nile dam, Egypt, December 3, 2019. (Reuters)

Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan exchanged on Tuesday proposals on formulating a “unified draft” that would lead to an agreement to regulate the rules for filling and operating the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD).

The African Union-sponsored talks will continue until August 28, in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.

For nearly a decade, talks among the three countries over the operation and filling of the mega-dam, which Addis Ababa is constructing on the Nile River and raises Egyptian and Sudanese concerns, have faltered.

Tuesday’s meeting was attended by Cairo, Addis Ababa and Khartoum’s ministers of water resources, observers from the European Union and United States and experts from the AU Commission.

Sudan revealed differences among the three countries over the interpretation of procedures for unifying their drafts on a final deal, which was mentioned in the South African Foreign Ministry’s report.

According to a statement by Sudan’s Irrigation Ministry, the three countries exchanged proposals for the final text of the agreement. It pointed out that they chose both “legal and technical representatives from each country to participate in the merging of the three texts.”

Sudanese Irrigation Minister Yasser Abbas presented proposals for the measures that will be followed during the current round of talks. The statement said the three countries will work to merge their proposals into a unified agreement and hand over a joint project to the AU Chief and South African President, Cyril Ramaphosa.

The tripartite meetings will continue Wednesday.

Sudan’s negotiating delegation stressed during a meeting Sunday the importance of returning to the agenda set by Ramaphosa in early August and the experts' report submitted to the mini-African summit held in July.

The meeting is based on the outcomes of the July 21 mini-summit and Sunday’s joint six-party meeting between the ministers of water resources and irrigation and the ministers of foreign affairs from Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia.

The AU is seeking to formulate a unified draft that includes proposals of the three countries, despite the wide differences between Ethiopia’s demands on one hand, and those of Egypt and Sudan on the other, sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Cairo fears the potential negative impact of GERD on the flow of its annual share of the Nile’s 55.5 billion cubic meters of water, while Addis Ababa says the dam is not aimed at harming Egypt or Sudan’s interests, stressing that the main objective is to generate electricity to support its development.



International Coalition to End Mission in Iraq, Keep Going in Syria

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and US President Joe Biden meet in Washington. (AFP file photo)
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and US President Joe Biden meet in Washington. (AFP file photo)
TT

International Coalition to End Mission in Iraq, Keep Going in Syria

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and US President Joe Biden meet in Washington. (AFP file photo)
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and US President Joe Biden meet in Washington. (AFP file photo)

A US-led coalition's military mission in Iraq will end by September 2025 and there will be a transition to bilateral security partnerships, the United States and Iraq said in a joint statement on Friday.

The US has approximately 2,500 troops in Iraq and 900 in neighboring Syria as part of the coalition formed in 2014 to combat ISIS as it rampaged through the two countries.

The joint statement provided few details, including how many US troops would leave Iraq and from which bases.

The announcement was a product of nine months of negotiations.

An Iraqi official said the coalition will maintain its mission in Syria.

Not a withdrawal

In a briefing with reporters on Friday, a senior US official said that the move was not a withdrawal and declined to say if any troops would even be leaving Iraq.

"I just want to foot stomp the fact that this is not a withdrawal. This is a transition. It's a transition from a coalition military mission to an expanded US-Iraqi bilateral security relationship," the official said according to Reuters.

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani initiated talks with Washington in January on the change. He has said that, while he appreciates their help, US troops have become a magnet for instability, frequently targeted and responding with strikes often not coordinated with the Iraqi government.

Reuters has reported that the agreement would see hundreds of troops leave by September 2025, with the remainder departing by the end of 2026.

Under the plan, all coalition forces would leave the Ain al-Asad airbase in western Anbar province and significantly reduce their presence in Baghdad by September 2025.

US and other coalition troops are expected to remain in Erbil. Other nations, including Germany, France, Spain, and Italy, contribute hundreds of troops to the coalition.

The drawdown will mark a notable shift in Washington's military posture in the Middle East.

While primarily focused on countering ISIS, US officials acknowledge the US presence also serves as a strategic position against Iranian influence.

This position has grown more important as Israel and Iran escalate their regional confrontation, with US forces in Iraq shooting down rockets and drones fired towards Israel in recent months, according to US officials.

Sudani win

Sudani aide Hussein Allawi told Asharq Al-Awsat that the mission will completely end its mission in Iraq in 2026 and focus its operations in Syria.

The coalition, which helped Iraqi armed forces liberate provinces that terrorist groups had seized ten years ago, is no longer needed, he added.

The agreement will likely present a political win for Sudani as he balances Iraq's position as an ally of both Washington and Tehran.

An Iraqi political source told Asharq Al-Awsat is a victory for Sudani, who had for months insisted on the withdrawal despite Washington’s reservations and pressure from Iraqi armed factions that wanted to “violently” drive them out of the country.

Sudani put the finishing touches to the deal during his recent visit to New York where he attended the United Nations General Assembly, he revealed.

The announcement of the end of the mission is a political win at a very critical moment in the Middle East, he added.

However, a Shiite politician said the forces that are opposed to the American troop deployment are “wary of the vagueness of the announcement.”

The position of the armed forces will become clear at the appropriate time as they await the details of the plan to come to light and its implementation on the ground, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Iraqi circles have completely lost faith in the Americans, who at first may agree to Iraq’s request for them to leave, but may then place obstacles to renege on the deal, he went on to say.

The pro-Iran Kataib Hezbollah faction called on Sudani against rushing to announce the pullout of the forces.

In a statement, it said the timing of the announcement was “not right given the American’s involvement in the mass killing of children, women and innocents and the operations of betrayal in Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen and Syria.”