Iran Seeks Russia’s Advanced Radar to Confront US F-35 Fighters

 The crew of an F-35 fighter moments after it arrived at al-Dhafra base in the UAE in 2019 (Central Command)
The crew of an F-35 fighter moments after it arrived at al-Dhafra base in the UAE in 2019 (Central Command)
TT

Iran Seeks Russia’s Advanced Radar to Confront US F-35 Fighters

 The crew of an F-35 fighter moments after it arrived at al-Dhafra base in the UAE in 2019 (Central Command)
The crew of an F-35 fighter moments after it arrived at al-Dhafra base in the UAE in 2019 (Central Command)

Iran has been in a race against time to obtain advanced Russian-manufactured radar systems to challenge the United States-made F-35 fighter jets.

Russia and China have recently opposed a US attempt in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to extend an arms embargo on Iran which is due to expire in October.

The US argues that it can trigger the process - known as snapback - because a 2015 Security Council resolution that enshrines the nuclear deal still names it as a participant.

Thirteen council members expressed their opposition, arguing that Washington’s move is void given that it is using a process agreed under a 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers that it quit two years ago.

Few days before triggering the process, Iranian Defense Minister Amir Hatami said upon his arrival in Moscow that talks with officials will mainly focus on cooperation in the fields of advanced military technology.

Russian sources have recently said that a Russian-made Rezonans-NE radar system, which Iran purchased to identify and track stealth aircraft and hypersonic targets, successfully spotted and tracked US F-35 fighters near the country’s borders during an aggravation of tensions in early 2020, following the death of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani.

Rezonans-NE radar had been on round-the-clock combat duty in Iran for several years, TASS quoted deputy CEO of Rezonans Research Center Alexander Stuchilin.

“The radar’s personnel were transmitting information, including the routes of F-35 flights, in clear, thus confirming that it was reliably tracking the planes. For this reason, the opponent did not commit any irreparable actions that might have caused a big war,” Stuchilin said on the sidelines of the international military-technical forum Army-2020.

The Russian official’s statements contradict with doubts over the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps’ (IRGC) ability to control the radar system.

This comes in light of its announcement that targeting the civilian passenger plane during its ballistic attack on Iraqi bases housing US forces was due to a radar error.

Iran retracted 72 hours later from the first official story, about the crash of a Ukrainian airliner, and the killing of 176 people on board.

In the first press conference following the incident, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the IRGC Aerospace Force, said his country’s air defense systems were put on the “highest level of readiness” and alerted to a possible cruise missile attack prior to the plane crash incident.

He added that the operator then identified what his air defense system had detected as an incoming cruise missile 19 kilometers away.

However, Tehran Military Prosecutor Gholam Abbas Torki said the shooting down of a Ukrainian airliner in Iran was due to human error.

“The portable system which fired the missile did not accurately determine the real north after rebooting, and this huge mistake caused the operator of the air defense system to see the plane on its radar as a target that is approaching Tehran from the northwestern region,” he said.

The Iranian operator was reported to have mistaken the Boeing jetliner for a cruise missile.

The Russian official’s defense of the effectiveness of the radar systems in Iran seems to be aimed at luring other countries to buy Russian systems, which are finding fierce competition with the Patriot system.



Iran Treads Carefully, Backing Hezbollah While Avoiding War

Analysts say Iran's strategy is to project power without being dragged into a war and playing into Israel's hands. ATTA KENARE / AFP/File
Analysts say Iran's strategy is to project power without being dragged into a war and playing into Israel's hands. ATTA KENARE / AFP/File
TT

Iran Treads Carefully, Backing Hezbollah While Avoiding War

Analysts say Iran's strategy is to project power without being dragged into a war and playing into Israel's hands. ATTA KENARE / AFP/File
Analysts say Iran's strategy is to project power without being dragged into a war and playing into Israel's hands. ATTA KENARE / AFP/File

As violence between Israel and Hezbollah escalates, Iran is walking a tightrope by supporting Hezbollah without being dragged into a full-blown conflict and playing into its enemy's hands.
With a focus on easing its isolation and reviving its battered economy, Iran is aware that war could complicate efforts to secure relief from crippling sanctions, AFP said.
Cross-border fire between Israel and Hezbollah, sparked by Hamas's October 7 attack on Israel, has intensified, especially after last week's sabotage on Hezbollah's communications that killed 39 people.
Israeli air strikes on Hezbollah strongholds in Lebanon followed, killing hundreds. Hezbollah retaliated with rocket barrages.
Despite the surge in hostilities, Iran appears determined to avoid direct military confrontation.
"Iran is not going to be pulled into war," said Hamid Gholamzadeh, an Iran-based political expert.
Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group said Iran's strategy was to project power, without directly engaging, especially as escalation could benefit Israel and impact the US election.
"Iran does not want to play into its arch-enemy's hands," said Vaez, noting Iran's priority was securing sanctions relief and some economic stability.
Even during its first-ever direct attack on Israel in April -- retaliation for an air strike Tehran's embassy annex in Damascus -- most missiles were intercepted by Israel's defenses or allied forces.
Measured approach
In New York, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian accused Israel of warmongering while positioning Iran as restrained.
He suggested Iran had held back retaliation after the killing of Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran in July, fearing it could derail US efforts for a Gaza ceasefire.
"We tried to not respond. They kept telling us we were within reach of peace, perhaps in a week or so," he said.
"But we never reached that elusive peace. Every day Israel is committing more atrocities."
This measured approach echoes Iran's response earlier this year during heightened tensions with Israel. Iran fired hundreds of missiles and drones after the Damascus strike, but most were intercepted.
Analysts say Iran is flexing its muscles amid the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, without provoking a US response.
Iran continues to face Western sanctions, especially since the United States, under then-president Donald Trump, withdrew from a nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers in 2018.
European nations have also slapped sanctions on Iran, accusing it of supplying ballistic missiles to Russia for the Ukraine war.
Iran denied the accusations, with Pezeshkian saying in New York that Iran was "willing to sit down with the Europeans and the Americans to have a dialogue and negotiations".
Vaez said any Iranian escalation could strengthen Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and even possibly help Trump return to power.
This "would be highly detrimental for Iranian interests", he said.
'Dangerous consequences'
Despite its restraint, Iran continues to back Hezbollah. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned Tehran would "not remain indifferent" to Israeli attacks.
Iran also urged the UN Security Council to take immediate action, warning of "dangerous consequences" for Israel.
Israel has targeted senior Hezbollah commanders since the Gaza war began.
Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei this week lamented the loss of Hezbollah's fighters but said it would not bring the group "to its knees".
Afifeh Abedi, a political researcher, said Iran was evaluating its support for Hezbollah, but noted the group's "significant human resources".
Gholamzadeh added that Hezbollah's resources ensure it will not be easily defeated.
"Hezbollah needs to be supported, but this support does not mean that they might be defeated if there is no support," he said.
Vaez said last week's attack on Hezbollah's communications may have weakened the group, but it would not be completely "paralyzed even if the first two tiers of its leadership were... eliminated".
This vulnerability, he said, could be one of the reasons for Iran and Hezbollah's "reluctance to enter a full-fledged war".