Aoun, PM-Designate Differ over Shape of New Lebanese Govt.

Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Mustapha Adib. (Dalati & Nohra)
Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Mustapha Adib. (Dalati & Nohra)
TT

Aoun, PM-Designate Differ over Shape of New Lebanese Govt.

Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Mustapha Adib. (Dalati & Nohra)
Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Mustapha Adib. (Dalati & Nohra)

Differences have emerged between Lebanese President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Mustapha Adib over the shape of the country’s new government. Adib is pushing for the formation of a 14-minister cabinet, while Aoun is leaning towards one comprised of 24 members.

Sources monitoring the PM-designate’s government formation efforts said he submitted to the president two draft lineups, each formed of 14 ministers. Both lineups do not include the name of ministers, but the distribution of portfolios according to sects.

Aoun, however, proposed the formation of a 24-minister government of comprised of experts who are backed by political forces. Each minister would take over one portfolio, which would help with the swift implementation of much-needed reform.

A 14-member cabinet, he said, would mean that a minister would take over more than one portfolio, which would slow down reform.

Political blocs that backed Adib’s nomination, significantly former premiers, support his push for the formation of a 14-member cabinet.

Their sources told Asharq Al-Awsat: “It is unacceptable for the establishment of a government similar to the caretaker one headed by Hassan Diab.” The only difference between the Diab and Adib government would be the ministers, but its identity will be the same.

The country is enduring a massive crisis and the opportunity is now available for it to catch its breath and steer it towards salvation, added the sources. The country must take advantage of the international support it is receiving after the devastating August 4 Beirut blast.

They stressed that they reject the formation of a “loose” 24-member government, and would rather see the establishment of a cabinet of experts and professionals. They acknowledged that the majority of Lebanese people are politicized or have political affiliations, but the new ministers should not belong directly or indirectly to political parties.

Moreover, they expressed concerns that the push for the formation of a 24-minister cabinet would be an attempt to improve the chances of MP Gebran Bassil of obtaining a portfolio.

The new government must not be seen as an opportunity “to improve the chances of this figure or that,” remarked the sources.

They explained that given the Christian Lebanese Forces and Kataeb party’s boycott of the government, that leaves the scene clear for Aoun and Bassil’s Free Patriotic Movement. With a 24-member government, Bassil would seek to occupy the 12 seats reserved for Christian figures, under the pretext of naming ministers from civil society.

Information obtain by Asharq Al-Awsat revealed that Bassil had proposed the idea of the rotation of cabinet portfolios in order to improve his chances of naming ministers. The portfolios would be subject to “negotiations and swaps”, which would indirectly boost his share in the cabinet.

The rotation of seats has been rejected by the “Shiite duo” of Hezbollah and Amal. They fear that proposal would impact the four sovereign portfolios (foreign affairs, interior, finance and defense) and their demand that the finance portfolio be retained by a Shiite figure.

The signature of the finance minister is necessary for decrees and decisions that require financial spending. Such decrees demand the signature of the president, who is always a Maronite Christian, and the prime minister, who is always a Sunni. By retaining the finance portfolio, the Shiite parties will enjoy representation in the executive authority.



Israel Sees More to Do on Lebanon Ceasefire

FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon,  January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
TT

Israel Sees More to Do on Lebanon Ceasefire

FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon,  January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo

Israel said on Thursday the terms of a ceasefire with Hezbollah were not being implemented fast enough and there was more work to do, while the Iran-backed group urged pressure to ensure Israeli troops leave south Lebanon by Monday as set out in the deal.

The deal stipulates that Israeli troops withdraw from south Lebanon, Hezbollah remove fighters and weapons from the area and Lebanese troops deploy there - all within a 60-day timeframe which will conclude on Monday at 4 a.m (0200 GMT).

The deal, brokered by the United States and France, ended more than a year of hostilities triggered by the Gaza war. The fighting peaked with a major Israeli offensive that displaced more than 1.2 million people in Lebanon and left Hezbollah severely weakened.

"There have been positive movements where the Lebanese army and UNIFIL have taken the place of Hezbollah forces, as stipulated in the agreement," Israeli government spokesmen David Mencer told reporters, referring to UN peacekeepers in Lebanon.

"We've also made clear that these movements have not been fast enough, and there is much more work to do," he said, affirming that Israel wanted the agreement to continue.

Mencer did not directly respond to questions about whether Israel had requested an extension of the deal or say whether Israeli forces would remain in Lebanon after Monday's deadline.

Hezbollah said in a statement that there had been leaks talking about Israel postponing its withdrawal beyond the 60-day period, and that any breach of the agreement would be unacceptable.
The statement said that possibility required everyone, especially Lebanese political powers, to pile pressure on the states which sponsored the deal to ensure "the implementation of the full (Israeli) withdrawal and the deployment of the Lebanese army to the last inch of Lebanese territory and the return of the people to their villages quickly.”

Any delay beyond the 60 days would mark a blatant violation of the deal with which the Lebanese state would have to deal "through all means and methods guaranteed by international charters" to recover Lebanese land "from the occupation's clutches," Hezbollah said.