Political Reactions After Haniyeh Threatened Israel From Lebanon

Hamas' political bureau chief Ismail Haniyeh greets supporters during a visit to the Ein el-Hilweh camp, Lebanon's largest Palestinian refugee camp, near the southern coastal city of Sidon on September 6, 2020. (Mahmoud ZAYYAT / AFP)
Hamas' political bureau chief Ismail Haniyeh greets supporters during a visit to the Ein el-Hilweh camp, Lebanon's largest Palestinian refugee camp, near the southern coastal city of Sidon on September 6, 2020. (Mahmoud ZAYYAT / AFP)
TT

Political Reactions After Haniyeh Threatened Israel From Lebanon

Hamas' political bureau chief Ismail Haniyeh greets supporters during a visit to the Ein el-Hilweh camp, Lebanon's largest Palestinian refugee camp, near the southern coastal city of Sidon on September 6, 2020. (Mahmoud ZAYYAT / AFP)
Hamas' political bureau chief Ismail Haniyeh greets supporters during a visit to the Ein el-Hilweh camp, Lebanon's largest Palestinian refugee camp, near the southern coastal city of Sidon on September 6, 2020. (Mahmoud ZAYYAT / AFP)

Several Lebanese officials criticized on Monday comments delivered by Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh during his visit to Lebanon last weekend when he announced that his organization has missiles capable of striking the city of Tel Aviv, Israel’s commercial and cultural center, and areas beyond it.

“Haniyeh’s visit comes as part of political propaganda planned by forces of the resistance axis to prove their presence in Lebanon,” Mustafa Alloush, former MP and leading official at the Mustaqbal Movement told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He said: “There are some parties that planned the visit to send a message to the inside and outside: If you tighten the noose on us, we will find a way out from somewhere else.”

Alloush said Haniyeh’s comments violated Lebanon’s sovereignty, adding that he was not surprised to see no official statements condemning the Hamas leader’s threats, “because the issue is related to Hezbollah.”

During a visit to Ain al-Hilweh Palestinian camp in the southern port city of Sidon, Haniyeh said, “Our missiles had a range of several kilometers (miles) from the border with Gaza.”

For his part, member of the Strong Republic (Lebanese Forces) parliamentary bloc, MP Wehbe Katisha also denounced the fact that Haniyeh threatened Israel from Lebanon.

“Did we go back to the year 1969 with plans to open a new road to Palestine passing through another Lebanon’s Jounieh (in reference to a popular PLO slogan that said "the road through Jerusalem leads through Jounieh,” a northern, coastal Lebanese city),” the MP wrote on his Twitter account.

Also, resigned MP Nadim Gemayel (Phalange Party) wrote Monday, “Lebanon is not a podium from which positions are announced, one day to express support for Syria, another day for Iran, and another for Palestine.”

Haniyeh had arrived in Beirut last Tuesday, in his first visit to Lebanon in 27 years. The Hamas leader met with Speaker Nabih Berri, caretaker PM Hassan Diab, director-general of the Security General, Major General Abbas Ibrahim, and the Grand Mufti of Lebanon, Sheikh Abdul Latif Derian.

He also met with Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah and head of the Progressive Socialist Party Walid Jumblatt.



US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
TT

US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)

Recent statements by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on his willingness to meet Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to normalize relations between the two countries have sparked mixed reactions.
While the Syrian opposition sees the possibility of such a meeting despite the challenges, Damascus views the statements as a political maneuver by the Turks. Meanwhile, the United States has tied the normalization process to achieving a political solution in Syria based on UN Security Council Resolution 2254, issued in 2015.
Turkish media reported on Thursday that a US administration official, who was not named, confirmed that Washington is against normalizing relations with the Syrian regime under Assad. He emphasized that Washington cannot accept normalizing ties with Damascus without progress toward a political solution that ends the conflicts in Syria.
Meanwhile, the head of the National Coalition of Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces, Hadi al-Bahra, stated that a meeting between Assad and Erdogan is possible despite the obstacles. In a statement to Reuters on Thursday, Bahra said the meeting is feasible, even though Ankara is fully aware that the Assad regime cannot currently meet its demands and understands the regime’s limitations.
Bahra pointed out that the UN-led political process remains frozen and that he had briefed US and Western officials on the latest developments in the Syrian file. On Saturday, Bahra participated in a consultative meeting in Ankara with the Syrian Negotiation Commission, along with a high-level delegation from the US State Department, during which they exchanged views on the political solution and the need to establish binding mechanisms for implementing international resolutions related to the Syrian issue.
On the other side, Assad’s special advisor, Bouthaina Shaaban, dismissed Erdogan’s announcement that Ankara is awaiting a response from Damascus regarding his meeting with Assad for normalization as another political maneuver with ulterior motives.
Shaaban, speaking during a lecture at the Omani Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which was reported by Turkish media on Thursday, stated that any rapprochement between the two countries is contingent on its withdrawal of forces from Syrian territory.