The Absurdity of Mesut Özil’s Exile, Yet Another Top Talent Cut Adrift

Mesut Özil during an Arsenal training session last month. Photograph: Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC/Getty Images
Mesut Özil during an Arsenal training session last month. Photograph: Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC/Getty Images
TT

The Absurdity of Mesut Özil’s Exile, Yet Another Top Talent Cut Adrift

Mesut Özil during an Arsenal training session last month. Photograph: Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC/Getty Images
Mesut Özil during an Arsenal training session last month. Photograph: Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC/Getty Images

There’s been something strangely disconcerting about seeing Arsène Wenger back on our screens, promoting his new book. Almost every interviewer he has faced has tried to lure him into some sort of indelicacy. Come on Arsène, settle some scores. Shit-talk Mourinho. Shit-talk Arteta. Shit-talk the board. Give us the full-body contact. Yet by and large, Wenger has refused to dance. His book is restrained, measured, high on facts and light on gossip, and has thus inevitably been panned as a crushing disappointment. Occasionally, however – much like his teams – he can still produce a moment of pure transcendence.

On Friday night, Wenger was a guest on the Graham Norton Show, where he explained why footballers need a coach. “When people come together, it creates a magic,” he answered. “Sometimes the energy gets together, and they go up to a level where it becomes art. The art of flying together.” It was a beautiful, succinct image: his life’s mission, boiled down for a prime-time BBC One audience. Naturally, Norton quickly changed the subject to Wenger banning Mars bars. Freddie Flintoff told a story about drinking pints. The audience roared. Later, when the show’s Facebook page posted a clip from the program, the one they chose was: “Arsène Wenger on his iconic fight with José Mourinho.”

Ever misunderstood, ever misconstrued, a man not just out of work but seemingly out of time. As we watched Wenger smiling along with Dawn French and Samuel L Jackson in the studio, it was possible to glimpse a faint outline of the world he left behind. They wanted a trophy, and instead he gave them the truth. They wanted aggression, and instead he gave them art.

The house was crumbling, and he bought them another piano. They wanted another Vieira, and instead they got Mesut Özil.

Of all the Wenger-era players still at Arsenal under the current regime, it is Özil who best embodies the sharp divide between them. He hasn’t played a minute since March. Last week he was left out of Arsenal’s Europa League squad. He is 32 years old, his contract expires next summer, and we are contractually obliged at this point to mention his weekly wages of £350,000, as if he were a taxpayer-funded yacht.

The fall came more suddenly than many assume: until the pandemic, Özil was still a regular starter. Yet a player signed to play Wenger’s frictionless, intricate, high-possession, jazz-hands football was always going to struggle in a slingy, concussive, vertical system. Mikel Arteta wants quick, solid lads who can play to a plan, press like dogs, who relish contact rather than avoid it. The club wants good, loyal lads who will take a pay cut when asked and won’t piss off the Chinese government on Twitter.

And so perhaps this was a relationship that was always going to run aground. We can go back and forth about the rights and wrongs of this, the little ruptures that led us to this point, about the extent to which Özil is culpable in his own plight, or whether it is really a plight at all. But let’s take a step back here: a very good footballer is currently being paid £18m a year to not play football. At the same time, his club are pleading penury and sacking 55 members of staff and a dinosaur.

At the same time, the entire infrastructure of English football is on the verge of collapse. Was there really, honestly, not a better way of doing this? This is, after all, a problem that goes beyond one flighty playmaker and one high-energy pressing game. Scour the big clubs and you will find an entire army of lost toys and odd socks, a nuclear stockpile of wasted talent gathering dust in the shadows: Marcos Rojo at Manchester United, Danny Rose at Tottenham, Sami Khedira at Juventus, Gareth Bale at Real Madrid for the last two seasons. All fit. All still drawing an (often handsome) wage. All feted and acclaimed at arrival, only to be cut adrift.

These aren’t bad or broken players. Whether you rate them or not, they are essentially talent: talent that in a more efficient, enlightened sport would easily find a loving home. Elite football has always had a certain disdain for its hired labor, but rarely has it indulged this sort of wastage: the stuffed rosters, the stockpiled academies, the armies of loanees, the human traffic being shoveled around the continent by gluttonous agents.

Perhaps this is the logical corollary of a game strung out by inequality. In a game where wealth is deeply asymmetrical and compassion is scarce, where fans clamor ceaselessly for fresh flesh, it will always be easier to sign a new player and pin the blame on the old one. Meanwhile, an experienced creative midfielder is not playing football for a club who – on the evidence of their recent games – are desperately in need of an experienced creative midfielder. If there’s any logic in this apparent absurdity, I invite you to find it.

Wenger understood this perfectly, of course. For a coach who always sought to blend idealism with game theory, you suspect there is little that offends him more than inefficiency, punctured dreams, squandered talent.

“It is a waste for him, and for the club as well,” he said last week. “A world champion who has played at Real Madrid. He’s been the record player of assists, so you have to find a way to get him involved again.” But Wenger is finally out, and so is Özil: a player who already felt out of time when he arrived, and looks even more so now.

(The Guardian)



Olympics in India a ‘Dream’ Facing Many Hurdles

A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)
A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)
TT

Olympics in India a ‘Dream’ Facing Many Hurdles

A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)
A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)

India says it wants the 2036 Olympics in what is seen as an attempt by Narendra Modi to cement his legacy, but the country faces numerous challenges to host the biggest show on earth.

The prime minister says staging the Games in a nation where cricket is the only sport that really matters is the "dream and aspiration" of 1.4 billion people.

Experts say it is more about Modi's personal ambitions and leaving his mark on the world stage, while also sending a message about India's political and economic rise.

Modi, who is also pushing for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, will be 86 in 2036.

"Hosting the Olympics will, in a way, burnish India's credentials as a global power," said academic Ronojoy Sen, author of "Nation at Play", a history of sport in India.

"The current government wants to showcase India's rise and its place on the global high table, and hosting the Olympic Games is one way to do it."

Already the most populous nation, India is on track to become the world's third-biggest economy long before the planned Olympics.

- Olympics in 50-degree heat? -

India submitted a formal letter of intent to the International Olympic Committee in October, but has not said where it wants to hold the Games.

Local media are tipping Ahmedabad in Modi's home state of Gujarat, a semi-arid region where temperatures surge above 50 degrees Celsius (122F) in summer.

Gujarat state has already floated a company, the Gujarat Olympic Planning and Infrastructure Corporation, with a $710 million budget.

Ahmedabad has about six million people, its heart boasting a UNESCO-listed 15th-century wall which sprawls out into a rapidly growing metropolis.

The city is home to a 130,000-seater arena, the world's biggest cricket stadium, named after Modi. It staged the 2023 Cricket World Cup final.

The city is also the headquarters of the Adani Group conglomerate, headed by billionaire tycoon and Modi's close friend Gautam Adani.

Adani was the principal sponsor for the Indian team at this summer's Paris Olympics, where the country's athletes won one silver and five bronze medals.

- 'Window of opportunity' -

Despite its vast population India's record at the Olympics is poor for a country of its size, winning only 10 gold medals in its history.

Sports lawyer Nandan Kamath said hosting an Olympics was an "unprecedented window of opportunity" to strengthen Indian sport.

"I'd like to see the Olympics as a two-week-long wedding event," he said.

"A wedding is a gateway to a marriage. The work you do before the event, and all that follows, solidifies the relationship."

Outside cricket, which will be played at the Los Angeles Games in 2028, Indian strengths traditionally include hockey and wrestling.

New Delhi is reported to be pushing for the inclusion at the Olympics of Indian sports including kabaddi and kho kho -- tag team sports -- and yoga.

Retired tennis pro Manisha Malhotra, a former Olympian and now talent scout, agreed that global sporting events can boost grassroots sports but worries India might deploy a "top-down" approach.

"Big money will come in for the elite athletes, the 2036 medal hopefuls, but it will probably end at that," said Malhotra, president of the privately funded training center, the Inspire Institute of Sport.

Veteran sports journalist Sharda Ugra said India's underwhelming sports record -- apart from cricket -- was "because of its governance structure, sporting administrations and paucity of events".

"So then, is it viable for us to be building large stadiums just because we are going to be holding the Olympics?

"The answer is definitely no."

The Indian Olympic Association is split between two rival factions, with its president P.T. Usha admitting to "internal challenges" to any bid.

- 'Poor reputation' -

After Los Angeles, Brisbane will stage the 2032 Games.

The United States and Australia both have deep experience of hosting major sporting events, including previous Olympics.

India has staged World Cups for cricket and the Asian Games twice, the last time in 1982, but it has never had an event the size of an Olympics.

Many are skeptical it can successfully pull it off.

The 2010 Commonwealth Games in New Delhi were marked by construction delays, substandard infrastructure and accusations of corruption.

Many venues today are in a poor state.

"India will need serious repairing of its poor reputation on punctuality and cleanliness," The Indian Express daily wrote in an editorial.

"While stadium aesthetics look pretty in PowerPoint presentations and 3D printing, leaking roofs or sub-par sustainability goals in construction won't help in India making the cut."