James Jeffrey Leaves Post, Expects ‘No Change’ in US Policy on Syria

James Jeffrey during a visit to northwestern Syria in March 2020.
James Jeffrey during a visit to northwestern Syria in March 2020.
TT

James Jeffrey Leaves Post, Expects ‘No Change’ in US Policy on Syria

James Jeffrey during a visit to northwestern Syria in March 2020.
James Jeffrey during a visit to northwestern Syria in March 2020.

US Special Representative for Syria James Jeffrey has contacted several European and Arab officials and Syrian opposition figures to inform them that his mission was coming to an end and that the US policy would not change if Joe Biden won the presidency.

Special Envoy for Syria Joel Rayburn, who has attended most of Jeffrey’s meetings ever since his appointment in mid-2018, will take over his mission.

“This is a sign that the (US) policy continues at this stage pending the formation of the new administration,” said European officials.

Ever since coming to office, Jeffrey, 75, has contributed to formulating the US policy towards Syria, including the military presence in the northeast to prevent an ISIS resurgence, supporting the Kurdish administration, keeping economic sanctions on regime-linked figures through the Caesar Act, keeping contact with Arab and European states to prevent normalization with Damascus, supporting Turkey in northwestern Syria, and backing Israel in its airstrikes on Iranian sites.

Jeffrey believes that such moves “have worsened (Syria’s) economic crisis and increased pressure on Syria and drew Russia further into the Syrian quagmire, the officials said.

He has repeatedly said that the maximum pressure campaign on Damascus aims to achieve a series of objectives, including weakening Iranian influence, pushing Damascus to give up its chemical weapons, not to threaten countries neighboring Syria, and not back terrorists, implementing Security Council Resolution 2254, creating the right conditions for the return of refugees, in addition to holding those who have committed war crimes accountable.

In his phone calls with European officials, Jeffrey said US policy towards Syria “will continue” no matter who wins the elections.

“I see no change in our troop presence, I see no change in our sanctions policy, I see no change in our demand that Iran leave Syria, be it with a Biden administration or Trump one,” he said.

In an interview with Syria Direct, Jeffrey said: “We've sanctioned about 75 individuals under the Caesar Act, and under other acts that we found in certain circumstances make more sense. This is just the beginning of what will be further waves of sanctions.”

“Again, we're starting off with the people closest to (Bashar) Assad because we think that it is very important to focus on the accountability of those people who have financed him and on those people who have enabled his military machine.”

Among Jeffrey’s latest efforts, was a campaign to guarantee a European and Arab boycott for the conference on Syrian refugees that is set to take place in Damascus on November 11-12.

“He succeeded in this efforts because European countries decided to boycott (the conference). Both Lebanon and Jordan will send low-ranking diplomatic delegations to the conference’s opening session,” said the officials.

The UN representative in Damascus has also sent a written statement to the Syrian foreign ministry, informing it that he would attend the conference as an observer.

“Only Cuba, the Philippines, Armenia and Iran will take part in the conference, which is a major setback for Moscow and a success for Washington,” said one official.

In his interview with Syria Direct, Jeffrey called for the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) to leave Syria.

“We want to see the PKK cadre leave Syria. That is a major reason why there is tension with Turkey in the northeast, we want to reduce that tension because in all other areas other than the northeast, we have very close coordination with Turkey on the Syrian situation.”



Baghdad Urges Washington to Prevent ‘Imminent’ Israeli Strikes

Sudani visiting a market in Baghdad on Thursday (Government media)
Sudani visiting a market in Baghdad on Thursday (Government media)
TT

Baghdad Urges Washington to Prevent ‘Imminent’ Israeli Strikes

Sudani visiting a market in Baghdad on Thursday (Government media)
Sudani visiting a market in Baghdad on Thursday (Government media)

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani on Thursday called on major powers to “exert greater efforts to end the war in Palestine and Lebanon.” Meanwhile, an Iraqi government official urged the United States to “prevent any attacks on the country,” referring to potential Israeli strikes.
During a phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Al-Sudani stressed the importance of ensuring the conflict does not escalate “to a level that threatens regional and global stability.”
The Iraqi prime minister’s appeal comes amid reports suggesting that Israel may launch strikes on Iraq in retaliation for attacks by Iraqi armed factions targeting Israeli positions.
The Iraqi government is striving to assert its exclusive authority over weapons and war-related decisions. However, armed factions affiliated with the Axis of Resistance openly claim responsibility for near-daily rocket attacks on Israel. This has provided Israel with a justification for potentially targeting Iraqi territory, especially after it filed a complaint with the UN Security Council against six Iraqi factions and held Baghdad responsible for the attacks.
These factions have also openly declared their involvement in the ongoing conflict with Israel in Lebanon and Gaza. The Iraqi government has been unable to take decisive action to halt the activities of these factions, which many believe could soon expose Iraq to an Israeli strike.
According to media reports, Washington has warned Baghdad that Israeli airstrikes on Iraq are “imminent” unless the Iraqi government curtails attacks by Iranian-backed factions on Israel. The Times of Israel cited sources indicating that the United States has “exhausted all means of pressure on Israel” and urged Iraq to act swiftly to prevent such attacks.
Despite repeated assurances from the Iraqi government—including its recent adoption of 12 measures by the National Security Council to counter Israeli threats and complaints—the situation remains tense. These measures include monitoring Iraq’s western borders, preventing factions from launching attacks, and maintaining Iraq’s neutrality in the ongoing conflict.
On Wednesday, Abu Hussein Al-Hamidawi, Secretary-General of Kata’ib Hezbollah, made a striking statement on the role of resistance factions in the war and their commitment to the Unity of Fronts doctrine frequently mentioned by Axis of Resistance groups.
In an interview published by the faction’s media arm, Al-Hamidawi said: “The continuity of the Unity of Fronts concept depends on what the Lebanese Hezbollah decides.”
Al-Hamidawi also emphasized that resistance factions are constantly coordinating internally and with external partners such as Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Palestinian resistance leaders.
“We aim to ensure that the Palestinian people are not left alone and that the Unity of Fronts remains intact,” he stated.
Fadi Al-Shammari, a political advisor to Sudani, reiterated that Israel’s threats “are not new,” citing the recent complaint filed by Israel with the UN Security Council as part of its pattern of issuing threats.
In media statements, Al-Shammari reaffirmed the Iraqi government’s long-standing position: “The decision of war and peace lies solely with the Iraqi government.”
He noted that the factions’ attacks are being launched from areas outside Iraq’s borders, specifically from Syria. However, he stressed that the Iraqi government is working through its security and military agencies to prevent Iraq from becoming a battlefield for external or internal parties.
Al-Shammari also called on the United States to fulfill its responsibilities under the Strategic Framework Agreement and security pact with Iraq, emphasizing the need to deter and respond to any external attacks that threaten Iraq’s internal security.