Tales Uncovered From Solskjær's Past Point to a Bright Future

 Ole Gunnar Solskjær had an unsuccessful spell as Cardiff manager in 2014 but ‘always had integrity’. Photograph: Rebecca Naden/Reuters
Ole Gunnar Solskjær had an unsuccessful spell as Cardiff manager in 2014 but ‘always had integrity’. Photograph: Rebecca Naden/Reuters
TT

Tales Uncovered From Solskjær's Past Point to a Bright Future

 Ole Gunnar Solskjær had an unsuccessful spell as Cardiff manager in 2014 but ‘always had integrity’. Photograph: Rebecca Naden/Reuters
Ole Gunnar Solskjær had an unsuccessful spell as Cardiff manager in 2014 but ‘always had integrity’. Photograph: Rebecca Naden/Reuters

As Ole Gunnar Solskjær’s biographer, this writer was recently asked whether the military service the Norwegian performed as a 20-year-old aided the formation of a man whose career arc has taken in scoring Manchester United’s 1999 European Cup-winning goal to now being manager of England’s record 20-time champions.

The answer in essence was Solskjær has a self-possession that means it was immaterial; that whether or not he did the mandatory year in Norway’s army his would still have been a life and sporting career that is a triumph of self-determination.

As a kid Solskjær was the starlet striker whose size impeded before he drove himself to catch, then overtake, peers. As part of a gang-of-five signed for United by Alex Ferguson in the summer of 1996 he was “Ole-who?” when photographed alongside Karel Poborsky, Ronny Johnsen, Jordi Cruyff and Raimond van der Gouw. He illustrated precisely who Ole Gunnar Solskjær was by ending his debut season as top scorer, the first of 14 years as player and coach at United.

When taking his first managerial position at Molde FK in 2011 the pressure was intense: here was Norway’s most famous person billed as the No 1 who would secure for the club a first league title in their 100th year. This he did, then retained it in 2012, followed up with the Norwegian Cup in 2013 and thus left for Cardiff City with his opening three years rating him as Molde’s most garlanded manager.

At Molde his blueprint was to make his players believe. Those spoken with for The Red Apprentice say his opening days were invested in working on confidence – confidence that they could overcome the club’s inferiority complex. As with his great mentor Ferguson, being second was of zero interest.

So it was that Solskjær turned a club from perennial also-rans into a champion team, one that strutted through the Eliteserien, winning it by five points. In the biography Magnus Stamnestro, then an 18-year-old midfielder, illuminates how driven Solskjær was. “One man went home early from the celebration,” he says. “He had already started thinking of next season, when we did win the league again.”

If this was all glittering success, in south Wales Solskjær’s will to shape events was most severely tested. He took over in January 2014 and Cardiff listed from the start of an ill-starred tenure. The opening three Premier League matches were defeats before Norwich were beaten on 1 February. Cardiff won only twice more and were relegated with 30 points and goal difference of minus 42.

This was dire and Solskjær has always accepted full responsibility. Yet what Ben Turner, a Cardiff defender, states in the book is intriguing. Turner says: “I know he wasn’t given the full trust to manage in his own way without any interference. There were boys who were called in and told we weren’t playing and it really wasn’t his decision – that it was coming from above.

“As an example, we were in a relegation dogfight, had Aston Villa [on 11 February, 2014] and drew 0-0. It’s probably the best I’ve ever played in my life. Then we played Hull and three of the back four that started against Villa and got the clean sheet were dropped.

“I was told I was dropped for Juan Cala because Ole was told he had to play. Ole said: ‘I know we got a clean sheet against Villa, but I’ve been told that I have to play Juan Cala.’

“I was told I wasn’t playing because we wanted to try and pass the ball out more from the back. They told him – Ole – that on that basis Juan had to play, that was one of the reasons he was brought in. Well, it was a disaster because Juan and Steven Caulker didn’t get on, and they were the center-backs. It was a concern – what player wants to hear they’re dropped because it’s coming from the owner [Vincent Tan]?

“The way I looked at it was this: the owner’s got all the money in the world. He’s running a football club essentially as a side hobby and he’s got new toys and the new toy that week was Juan Cala. I had no reason to doubt what the gaffer was saying to me, that it’d come from above. He was an honest, genuine guy as far as I was concerned. We got relegated but he always had integrity.”

On leaving Cardiff in September 2014, Solskjær’s departure statement disappointed Tan because it mentioned “a difference in philosophies”. As quoted in the biography the Malaysian’s response suggested Solskjær had hinted at team meddling. “It gives the impression that a different philosophy [is that] maybe I interfere with him, maybe I do this or do that,” Tan said.

Solskjær and Cardiff were never an ideal fit and still Solskjær remained principled. It is why Turner and fellow Cardiff teammates recall him with fondness despite relegation. It is a fundamental reason why Solskjær’s impact on becoming United’s caretaker in December 2018 impressed Ed Woodward, the executive vice-chairman, enough to award him the full-time job.

It is also a prime factor why Solskjær has a genuine prospect of leading United to another title. Like Ferguson – and unlike David Moyes, Louis van Gaal and José Mourinho – Solskjær is able to alchemize the ideal relationship with players. One which, as the response to United’s 6-1 hammering by Tottenham illustrates (beating Newcastle, Paris Saint-Germain and RB Leipzig and drawing with Chelsea), motivates them to perform for their manager.

For a man who has lived the fairytale of being United’s 1999 Champions League hero, claiming the club’s first Premier League since Ferguson stepped away would be another.

Yet if Solskjær had signed for Tottenham – which he came close to doing in the mid-1990s – his place in United folklore and what could yet be achieved would not be possible.

For that story, though, you will have to read the book.

The Guardian Sport



Djokovic Backs Australian Open 2025 'Coaching Pods' but No Mics Please

Novak Djokovic - Reuters
Novak Djokovic - Reuters
TT

Djokovic Backs Australian Open 2025 'Coaching Pods' but No Mics Please

Novak Djokovic - Reuters
Novak Djokovic - Reuters

Novak Djokovic wandering across the court to have a chat with coach Andy Murray mid-match has been one of the more novel sights of the 2025 Australian Open but the Serbian is keen that what is said remains between them.

On-court coaching, previously banned and punishable by point deductions, disqualification or even suspension from tournaments is being positively encouraged at Melbourne Park with "coaching pods" at court level in the corners of the main stadiums.

In a sport where players have largely depended on themselves to problem-solve on the court, the move to bring entourages even closer to the action has understandably divided opinion, but Djokovic said he supported the idea, Reuters reported.

"I think it's a great new introduction to the tournament," said Djokovic, who will be hoping for any advantage in his bid to capture a record 25th Grand Slam title at his favourite hunting ground.

"The people who are there are selected by us internally in the team. We talk about who we think can contribute the most by being on the court. I'm happy with the four people that I have there sitting.

"It probably will change in the future with the microphone and everything. I'm happy as it is at the moment."

'DISCRETION, PRIVACY'

Djokovic understands that having cameras and microphones in the pods would make for entertaining social media content, but said that some boundaries just cannot be crossed.

"I understand the fun part and stuff going viral, because there will be quite a bit of material," Djokovic added.

"The only thing I dislike is the fact that someone from your opponent's team might be watching the match, and she or he hears that and then texts the team member. Ten seconds later you have the information.

"I feel like there should be some discretion and privacy in terms of the actual on-court coaching tactics. That shouldn't be out there public, because then it endangers you during matches."

Defending women's champion Aryna Sabalenka has opted not to use on-court seating facilities, preferring to have her sizeable entourage in the stands, even if it is a tight squeeze.

"I like to see the whole team," said the Belarusian.

"I want to see all the people in my box. Even if I'm not looking at each person in my box, I always look at my coach, but I still see everyone. That's important.

"Sometimes I just want to look at my boyfriend for support. I just don't want to look at the coach first, then look in the box because I have a lot of coaches. Four seats isn't enough.

"If they would make it to eight seats (in the pod), I don't know how, but it would be much better for me. We decided to put everyone in the players' box. Maybe they were tight there and not comfortable, but I was comfortable to see all of them."

Second seed Alexander Zverev was also sceptical about the pods, saying tennis was following other sports in modernising some aspects of the game.

"There's innovation in all sports," Zverev said.

"Tennis is getting innovation as well. I'm not sure what kind of innovation that is. But we're moving forward, the world is moving forward and that's the way it is."