Mixed Feelings Emerge in Iraq over Sulaymaniyah Protests

Headquarters of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) is seen after it was burnt during anti-government protests on the outskirt of Sulaimaniyah, Iraq. Reuters
Headquarters of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) is seen after it was burnt during anti-government protests on the outskirt of Sulaimaniyah, Iraq. Reuters
TT

Mixed Feelings Emerge in Iraq over Sulaymaniyah Protests

Headquarters of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) is seen after it was burnt during anti-government protests on the outskirt of Sulaimaniyah, Iraq. Reuters
Headquarters of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) is seen after it was burnt during anti-government protests on the outskirt of Sulaimaniyah, Iraq. Reuters

Armed Iraqi factions aligned with Iran have announced their support for protests sweeping the Kurdish region of northern Iraq’s Sulaymaniyah province. This move contradicts their previous objection to demonstrations happening in Baghdad and other parts of the Levantine country.

Demonstrators have taken to the streets against the political leadership, high unemployment rate, and lack of public services.

The demonstrations, triggered over delayed payment of public sector salaries, turned violent when protesters approached the headquarters of political parties that run the autonomous Kurdish region of Iraq.

Iraqi President Barham Salih, for his part, has called for an end to “corruption, looting, plundering, and smuggling” following a sixth day of protests in Sulaymaniyah.

“Violence is not a solution to confront the legitimate demands of citizens,” President Salih said in his statement on Tuesday.

“The will and the demands of the peaceful demonstrators must be respected. We demand that the security forces behave in accordance with the law and refrain from using violence,” he urged.

Iraqi lawmaker Aras Habib told Asharq Al-Awsat that “the protests in Sulaymaniyah undoubtedly prove that the concerns and challenges facing the Iraqi citizen are the same regardless of his ethnicity or sect.”

“Solutions to these problems and crises must be unified, objective, and in the context of a comprehensive vision that includes all Iraqis,” Habib noted.

“The time has come to seriously think that we are all in the same boat and that any danger threatens everyone,” he urged.

It is worth noting that the Sulaymaniyah protests have gained attention nationwide. Protest groups in other parts of Iraq are carefully watching developments in the Kurdish province. Political parties and armed factions are also keeping a close eye.

Iraq’s independent Human Rights Commission expressed regret about what is happening in Sulaymaniyah.

“Salaries are a constitutional right, and therefore any delay in their disbursement will negatively affect the lives of citizens and their humanitarian requirements,” commission member Fadel Al-Gharawi said in a statement.

Gharawi called on the federal government and the regional government to hold an emergency meeting to find a solution for delayed salaries.



Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)

Politicians in Beirut said they have not received any credible information about Washington resuming its mediation efforts towards reaching a ceasefire in Lebanon despite reports to the contrary.

Efforts came to a halt after US envoy Amos Hochstein’s last visit to Beirut three weeks ago.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed the reports as media fodder, saying nothing official has been received.

Lebanon is awaiting tangible proposals on which it can build its position, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The only credible proposal on the table is United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, whose articles must be implemented in full by Lebanon and Israel, “not just Lebanon alone,” he stressed.

Resolution 1701 was issued to end the 2006 July war between Hezbollah and Israel and calls for removing all weapons from southern Lebanon and that the only armed presence there be restricted to the army and UN peacekeepers.

Western diplomatic sources in Beirut told Asharq Al-Awsat that Berri opposes one of the most important articles of the proposed solution to end the current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.

He is opposed to the German and British participation in the proposed mechanism to monitor the implementation of resolution 1701. The other participants are the United States and France.

Other sources said Berri is opposed to the mechanism itself since one is already available and it is embodied in the UN peacekeepers, whom the US and France can join.

The sources revealed that the solution to the conflict has a foreign and internal aspect. The foreign one includes Israel, the US and Russia and seeks guarantees that would prevent Hezbollah from rearming itself. The second covers Lebanese guarantees on the implementation of resolution 1701.

Berri refused to comment on the media reports, but told Asharq Al-Awsat that this was the first time that discussions are being held about guarantees.

He added that “Israel is now in crisis because it has failed to achieve its military objectives, so it has resorted to more killing and destruction undeterred.”

He highlighted the “steadfastness of the UN peacekeepers in the South who have refused to leave their positions despite the repeated Israeli attacks.”