Sexual Assaults, Harassment Allegations Rattle Turkey’s Literary World

Demonstrators in Istanbul denouncing violence against women in Turkey (File photo: dpa)
Demonstrators in Istanbul denouncing violence against women in Turkey (File photo: dpa)
TT

Sexual Assaults, Harassment Allegations Rattle Turkey’s Literary World

Demonstrators in Istanbul denouncing violence against women in Turkey (File photo: dpa)
Demonstrators in Istanbul denouncing violence against women in Turkey (File photo: dpa)

A recent online campaign rocked the Turkish literary world with allegations of sexual assaults and harassment against a number of prominent authors, whose fame have helped them escape law enforcement.

The campaign gained widespread attention in local media when prominent author Ibrahim Colak committed suicide after allegedly sending a series of lewd text messages to younger women.

It started with a single tweet from an anonymous account on social media under the hashtag: "Don't be silent against harassment", which soon began trending on Turkish Twitter.

The movement was joined by well-known figures, encouraging women for the first time to come forward and report the practices of renowned writers who believed they were immune to accountability.

The campaign began with a tweet on December 7 by a user called “Leyla Salinger” who shared a video of novelist Hasan Ali Toptas, once dubbed the eastern Franz Kafka, with a caption: "How many of us are waiting for this man to be exposed?"

Then, 20 women made similar accusations against Toptas using the #MeToo hashtag, leading many more to describe the harassment and abuse of other male writers, according to a report published Tuesday by TRT World, an affiliate of the Turkish Radio and Television Corporation (TRT).

As a result of this campaign, Colak, 51, killed himself on December 10 in Ankara after tweeting an apology to his family and friends.

"I had not prepared myself for such an end. I wanted to be a good person but I failed," Colak tweeted before taking his life, adding he could not "look in the faces of my wife, children, and friends".

Local media indicated that Colak may have sent the lewd text messages to the same user, Leyla, whose Twitter account was deactivated after the suicide.

The incident encouraged more women who were victims of harassment to come forward and talk about their experiences.

Author Pelin Buzluk told Hurriyet daily newspaper her own accusations against Toptas.

"I was in shock," she said, describing a "very frightening moment" in which Toptas "approached and forced" himself on her in 2011. She described how she had to lock herself in the toilet at his house to escape his attempts.

She added that the writer then told her: "Well, why did you wear that dress?”

Toptas issued a statement further stirring controversy, describing his actions as that of a “patriarchal perpetrator”, and refused to be held responsible for his actions.

Buzluk indicated that this is not “the apology of someone who regrets his actions.”

But Toptas denied her story later, telling Milliye daily that something like this has never happened. That same day, the newspaper ran interviews with five women accusing him of harassment.

After the claims blew up on social media, Toptas's publishing house, Everest, dropped him saying it was "against all kinds of harassment". He was also stripped of awards received earlier.

Buzluk's bravery encouraged another writer, Asli Tohumcu, to report author Bora Abdo for harassing her, which he denied. However, his publishing house, Iletisim, dropped him after the claims surfaced.

In the wake of the various allegations, women have been encouraged to send their stories to an email address.

This is not the first time Turkey's literary community has come under scrutiny. However, all previous allegations have led to no legal action.

In 2018, author Nazli Karabiyikoglu wrote a long piece for a Turkish website entitled: “Sexual harassment and persecution in Turkey's publishing sector.”

Karabiyikoglu ran the piece on her website with the #MeToo hashtag.



Israel Plans to Hit ‘Strategic Target’ in Iran

A man takes a picture of a car that was damaged in the area where a projectile landed after Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel, in Tel Aviv, Israel, October 2, 2024. REUTERS/Nir Elias
A man takes a picture of a car that was damaged in the area where a projectile landed after Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel, in Tel Aviv, Israel, October 2, 2024. REUTERS/Nir Elias
TT

Israel Plans to Hit ‘Strategic Target’ in Iran

A man takes a picture of a car that was damaged in the area where a projectile landed after Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel, in Tel Aviv, Israel, October 2, 2024. REUTERS/Nir Elias
A man takes a picture of a car that was damaged in the area where a projectile landed after Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel, in Tel Aviv, Israel, October 2, 2024. REUTERS/Nir Elias

The Israeli government decided it will respond to the Iranian missile attack by hitting a strategic target deep in the Iranian territories, reports have said.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant will finalize targets, timing and means for the response to Iran's missile attack after coordinating with their US-led allies, the reports said on Wednesday.

The decision that there will be an Israeli military response to the Iranian attack came following two lengthy sessions of the war cabinet held on Wednesday after Tel Aviv confirmed that Iran fired more than 180 ballistic missiles at Israel.

The Iranian attack came shortly after a new opinion poll showed that Netanyahu’s popularity, which was battered after the Hamas attacks on October 7, has been boosted by his country’s military successes against Lebanon and Iran.

Therefore, Israel believes it is necessary to strongly respond on both fronts, even though the Iranian missiles did not kill any Israeli.

Two Conflicting Stories

On Tuesday, Iran was keen to inform Israel, via Washington, of its anticipated attack, similar to Tehran’s response on April 14 to the Israeli attack on its consulate in Damascus, where seven were killed, including two top commanders.

The Israeli army’s spokesman, Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, appeared two hours before the Iranian attack on Israel and asked the public to follow the Home Front Command guidelines, warning that a fire from Iran could be wide in scope.

Iran then primarily targeted military sites, claiming that 90% of the missiles it launched against Israel hit their targets successfully.

However, Israel denied this claim and said only few missiles landed while the majority was intercepted.

In fact, the majority of missiles were intercepted by Israel. But some ballistic missiles did manage to strike, damaging the Nevatim air base in southern Israel, a military compound north Tel Aviv and near the Ben Gurion International Airport in the city of Lod.

Following the ballistic attack, Iran tried to conclude a public deal with Israel, indirectly announcing that the attack was its final response to the killings of (Hamas chief) Ismail Haniyeh, (Hezbollah leader) Hassan Nasrallah and IRGC commander Abbas Nilforushan.

Iran indirectly signaled that it would not object to Israel's escalation in Lebanon and Syria, the ongoing military operations in Gaza and the West Bank, and any military attack against the Houthis in Yemen and Iranian proxies in Iraq.

But Israel's political and military leaderships consider that Iran had crossed the red lines by firing missiles towards Israel, and therefore, they demand a harsh deterrent response.

Iranian nuclear strike

The US administration clearly senses that Netanyahu is close to involving Washington in a war against Iran.

Netanyahu is convinced that the Iranian leadership has decided to develop a nuclear weapon. Therefore, the Israeli PM believes that the time has come to realize his ambitions and attack Iran’s nuclear sites.

Netanyahu knows that Israel lacks the capabilities to stage such an attack on Iran. Instead, he plans to drag the US into a showdown with Iran, and risks a broader war.

But the US administration is convinced that a military solution does not guarantee the destruction of Iran's nuclear program and that diplomatic channels are still an option.

The US had already resumed talks with Tehran on its nuclear program and says there could be a positive trend in this regard.

The administration in Washington believes Netanyahu is seeking to sabotage the US-Iran talks and is using the war on Gaza and Lebanon to push the American administration to end any political solution and instead, launch decisive strikes against Tehran.

Therefore, the US is discussing with Israel the response to the Iranian attack, but in a measured way.

Israeli observers point out that both sides are considering practical plans, in which the Americans aim to achieve some of the Israeli objectives but in a way that allows Iran adopt its former strategy of “patience” and therefore, not feel obliged to respond.