Iran’s Allies Seek to Obstruct Iraq's Grand Faw Port Project

Iraq's director general at the General Company for Ports, Farhan al-Fartousi, signs a contract with South Korea's Daewoo Engineering & Construction, to construct the Grand Faw port, in Baghdad, Iraq, Dec. 30, 2020. (Reuters)
Iraq's director general at the General Company for Ports, Farhan al-Fartousi, signs a contract with South Korea's Daewoo Engineering & Construction, to construct the Grand Faw port, in Baghdad, Iraq, Dec. 30, 2020. (Reuters)
TT
20

Iran’s Allies Seek to Obstruct Iraq's Grand Faw Port Project

Iraq's director general at the General Company for Ports, Farhan al-Fartousi, signs a contract with South Korea's Daewoo Engineering & Construction, to construct the Grand Faw port, in Baghdad, Iraq, Dec. 30, 2020. (Reuters)
Iraq's director general at the General Company for Ports, Farhan al-Fartousi, signs a contract with South Korea's Daewoo Engineering & Construction, to construct the Grand Faw port, in Baghdad, Iraq, Dec. 30, 2020. (Reuters)

Iraq’s signing on Wednesday of a $2.625 billion deal with South Korea’s Daewoo Engineering & Construction to build the first phase at its planned Faw commodities port has revealed a dispute between two Iraqi camps over which country should oversee the construction.

Opinion is split between one camp that wants South Korea to take over the project, located in the southern Basra province, and another that wants China to be involved.

The first camp includes Prime Minister Mustsfa al-Kadhimi and political forces that support him, such as the Sairoon coalition of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr and the al-Hikma alliance led by Ammar al-Hakim. The second camp is comprised mainly of the Fateh alliance of the Popular Mobilization Forces and other parties that are known for their allegiance to Iran.

The positions from both camps over the project, expressed before and after the deal was inked, reveal just how deeply local forces are affected by the stances of regional and international powers. The dispute was not born yesterday, but has been brewing for weeks between the abovementioned camps.

The differing positions can be understood by expanding the overall political scene in Iraq and how it is affected by regional and international interests. Moreover, the South Korean company has been overseeing the al-Faw Grand Port for years and has never been met with such strong opposition as it is today from Iran’s allies.

Under the contract, signed in Baghdad by representatives of Iraq’s transportation ministry and the South Korean company, Daewoo E&C will handle construction work including building five berths to unload ships and a yard for containers.

Daweoo will also carry out dredging and drilling works to create an access navigation channel, Farhan al-Fartousi, Iraq’s director general at the General Company for Ports, told Reuters on the sidelines of a signing ceremony at the transportation ministry headquarters.

The first phase should allow the port to receive three million containers, and all the construction work should be finished in around four years, said Fartousi.

No sooner had the deal been announced that the Fateh alliance and other pro-Iran blocs kicked off efforts to collect signatures to file a request to debrief the minster of transportation.

The alliance claimed that the deal will lead to a “massive waste of public funds and confirms the suspicions of corruption.”

Secretary General of the Asaib Ahl al-Haq Qais al-Khazali slammed the deal, saying the corrupt figures who agreed to it will “eventually be exposed.”

“The people know who you are and will hold you accountable for this major crime against their future,” he tweeted.

“For our part, we will work tirelessly to thwart this crime against Iraq and we hope the honorable people will support us,” he added.



Lebanon Warns Hamas against Acts That Harm Its Security

 Civil defense workers and Lebanese soldiers gather at the site of an Israeli airstrike in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon, Sunday, April 27, 2025. (AP)
Civil defense workers and Lebanese soldiers gather at the site of an Israeli airstrike in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon, Sunday, April 27, 2025. (AP)
TT
20

Lebanon Warns Hamas against Acts That Harm Its Security

 Civil defense workers and Lebanese soldiers gather at the site of an Israeli airstrike in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon, Sunday, April 27, 2025. (AP)
Civil defense workers and Lebanese soldiers gather at the site of an Israeli airstrike in the southern suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon, Sunday, April 27, 2025. (AP)

Lebanon's top security body on Friday warned Hamas against using the country's territory for acts that undermine national security, after rocket fire towards Israel sparked retaliatory strikes.

The Higher Defense Council said it had recommended the government warn Hamas "against using Lebanese territory for any acts that undermine Lebanese national security".

The council headed by President Joseph Aoun added that "the utmost measures and necessary procedures will be taken to put a definitive end to any act that violates Lebanese sovereignty".

Last month, the Lebanese army arrested Lebanese and Palestinian individuals accused of firing rockets towards Israel on March 22 and March 28.

No group claimed responsibility for the attacks, with the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah, which fought a war against Israel last year, denying any involvement.

A Lebanese security source told AFP security forces arrested three Hamas members.

The Palestinian group claimed responsibility for occasional attacks on Israel from Lebanon during the war.

In its statement, the council said Aoun stressed Lebanon must not be used as a launchpad for instability or be dragged into unnecessary wars.

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said illegal weapons must be handed over and that Hamas and other factions must not "undermine security and national stability".

The council also said legal proceedings would begin early next week against those detained over the rocket fire.

Israel has continued to strike Lebanon despite a ceasefire agreed in November to end more than a year of hostilities with Hezbollah that included a bombing campaign and ground incursion.

Under the deal, Hezbollah was to withdraw north of the Litani River and dismantle military sites to its south.

Israel was to pull out of southern Lebanon but has kept troops in five positions it calls "strategic".