Tough Conditions Make It Hard for Yarmouk Residents to Return Home

A general view showing the destruction in the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp in the Syrian capital of Damascus, April 6, 2015. (AFP/STR)
A general view showing the destruction in the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp in the Syrian capital of Damascus, April 6, 2015. (AFP/STR)
TT

Tough Conditions Make It Hard for Yarmouk Residents to Return Home

A general view showing the destruction in the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp in the Syrian capital of Damascus, April 6, 2015. (AFP/STR)
A general view showing the destruction in the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp in the Syrian capital of Damascus, April 6, 2015. (AFP/STR)

Syrian authorities began issuing security approvals for a new batch of Palestinian refugees who wish to return to their homes in al-Yarmouk camp, given that they meet the required conditions.

A Palestinian resident of Yarmouk said she only wants to return to her home in the camp. She recalled her family's suffering in paying high rents and moving between houses.

The Palestinian woman, who was asked to review a security branch to study her request, complained that she did not know why her request was rejected.

“I want to return [to the camp] even if to set up a tent over the rubble of my house.”

Palestinian civil sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that a number of families have received approvals to return and they were provided with houses' unit numbers from the Military Security Unit in Damascus.

Palestinian refugees of the Yarmouk camp should submit their identification papers and officially certified property deeds to the Unit to obtain the security approval allowing them to reside in the camp.

Damascus Provincial Directorate announced that it is now only accepting certified title deeds as proof of ownership, while it used to recognize copies of these deeds earlier.

Residents of Yarmouk camp planning to return home said that the new conditions are complicated and “insuperable,” such as the acknowledgment of responsibility for the structural integrity of the dwelling, a pledge to remove rubble of the property within two months of receiving it, paying previous bills, and the undertaking to obtain an official license to restore the property.

The sources indicated that over 2,500 people applied to return to the camp when the governorate announced it was receiving requests for conditional return in November last year.

About 1,200 applications were accepted, while the rest were rejected because the houses are not suitable for residence.

Requests were then transferred to the Military Security Branch for security approvals after all conditions were met, with only 500 allowed to return.

Member of the Executive Office of the Damascus Provincial Directorate, Samir Jazaerli confirmed that 500 requests were approved out of the 1,200.

Jazaerli explained that the applications met the three requisites including structural safety, ownership proof, and the ability to obtain necessary security permits.

An additional 400 families returned to their homes in Yarmouk before the process officially started on November 10, he added.

The Yarmouk camp was established in 1957 about eight kilometers south of Damascus and it is the largest gathering of Palestinian refugees in the region.

Its population was estimated at more than 150,000 people in 2010, 112,550 of whom are registered refugees with UNRWA, and by the end of 2014, it dropped to only 20,000 residents.

After the emergence of ISIS in the camp, the remaining civilians left Yarmouk until the Syrian regime regained control in 2018 after which more than 70 percent returned.

As Syrian authorities began issuing a new batch of security approvals, the "Action Group for Palestinians of Syria” called upon shop owners in the camp to submit requests for their stores.

The Group pointed out that 400 families currently living in the Yarmouk camp suffer from a scarcity of basic services, especially that there are no shops in the camp or electricity.



Three Scenarios for Russia’s Military Presence in Syria

Russian President Vladimir Putin inspecting his troops at Hmeimim Airbase in Latakia on December 12, 2017 (Sputnik/AP)
Russian President Vladimir Putin inspecting his troops at Hmeimim Airbase in Latakia on December 12, 2017 (Sputnik/AP)
TT

Three Scenarios for Russia’s Military Presence in Syria

Russian President Vladimir Putin inspecting his troops at Hmeimim Airbase in Latakia on December 12, 2017 (Sputnik/AP)
Russian President Vladimir Putin inspecting his troops at Hmeimim Airbase in Latakia on December 12, 2017 (Sputnik/AP)

Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday he would meet former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who fled to Russia after his regime fell in Damascus. But what will Putin say to his former ally? And how might their first exchange unfold, given Russia’s role in helping Assad escape on a chaotic night?

The Kremlin, known for staging Putin’s meetings with precision, might opt to limit media coverage this time. Putin could be seen sitting at a small table with Assad, now on asylum

in Moscow, in a soundless scene—one that leaves little room for formal pleasantries.

Why has Putin announced plans to meet Assad? Is it to reprimand him? Many in Russia believe Assad’s stubbornness has hurt Moscow’s efforts, threatened its gains in Syria, and could eventually risk its key military presence there.

As details remain unclear, Russian experts are racing to analyze developments in Syria and outline scenarios for the next phase.

Some Russian experts have painted grim scenarios. A member of the prestigious Russian Council on Foreign and Defense Policy warned of potential risks, including a prolonged conflict with civil war elements, a humanitarian catastrophe with millions of refugees, escalating migration in Europe, and rising tensions among nations like Israel, the US, and Iran.

He also predicted a new wave of international terrorism that could reach far beyond the region.

Other experts echoed this pessimism. One posted an image of a Syrian dissident stepping on a statue of Assad’s father, warning that “this is just the beginning.” Another blamed the crisis on the “Obama curse,” citing the West’s interference, while a third shared a bleak analysis titled, “We Must Pray for Syria.”

So far, Russian media and think tanks have avoided any optimistic outlooks for Syria’s future.

Experts, who spoke to Asharq Al-Awsat, believe Moscow may be preparing to handle one of three possible scenarios in Syria.

The first, most favorable for Russia’s interests, involves Moscow reaching an agreement with the new Syrian authorities to maintain its military presence for a limited period.

This could mean replacing the current 49-year agreements with a five-year deal to facilitate a gradual Russian withdrawal. Such an arrangement could help the new leadership in Syria manage Western pressure to cut ties with Moscow.

The second scenario envisions Russia giving up its airbase in Hmeimim while retaining a significant presence in Tartus. This would mirror agreements from 1972, which allowed Russian naval vessels to use the Tartus logistics center in the Mediterranean. This compromise would preserve Russia’s interests while reducing Western pressure on Damascus.

The third scenario involves a full Russian withdrawal from both bases, with Moscow later seeking agreements for shared use of air and sea ports. Such agreements, similar to those Russia has signed with other countries, are less likely to provoke Western opposition.

Regardless of the outcome, the Kremlin has yet to develop a clear strategy for dealing with the emerging situation in Syria.

Key questions remain, including how to curb Iran’s regional influence, manage Türkiye and Israel’s growing roles in Syria, and establish a new regional balance that secures Moscow’s minimum interests.