Lebanon: Religious, Political Leaders Struggle to Overcome Repercussions of Bassil’s Speech

Lebanon’s Prime Minister-designate Saad Al-Hariri walks with caretaker Prime Minister Hassan Diab walks towards the government palace in Beirut. (Reuters)
Lebanon’s Prime Minister-designate Saad Al-Hariri walks with caretaker Prime Minister Hassan Diab walks towards the government palace in Beirut. (Reuters)
TT

Lebanon: Religious, Political Leaders Struggle to Overcome Repercussions of Bassil’s Speech

Lebanon’s Prime Minister-designate Saad Al-Hariri walks with caretaker Prime Minister Hassan Diab walks towards the government palace in Beirut. (Reuters)
Lebanon’s Prime Minister-designate Saad Al-Hariri walks with caretaker Prime Minister Hassan Diab walks towards the government palace in Beirut. (Reuters)

Sources close to the former prime ministers welcomed religious and political leaders’ endeavor to spare Lebanon sectarian and confessional tension, as a result of the organized campaign led by former Minister Gebran Bassil to hamper the formation of a new government.

The sources affirmed that the former premiers have imposed a “political siege” against the former minister, who was “betting on his ability to evoke sectarian alignment to regain his role on the political arena.”

The sources revealed that the former heads of government made a series of contacts to isolate Bassil, who - with the support of President Michel Aoun - used all his power within the state’s administrations and institutions in the hope that his name would remain on the list of candidates for the presidency.

Bassil, in a televised news conference on Sunday, called for a new political pact, which many saw as a coup against the Taif Accord.

In this context, former Prime Minister Fouad Siniora contacted each of Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rai, Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdullatif Derian, Melkite Greek Catholic Patriarch Youssef Absi, Metropolitan Bishop of the Greek Orthodox Church Elias Audi, and the deputy head of the Lebanese Forces party, MP Georges Adwan, who have all agreed on blocking attempts aimed at stirring sectarian disputes in the government formation process.

Sources said that some of the leaders expressed surprise at the targeted campaign led by Aoun against Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri, whom he accused of making false statements to the media regarding the cabinet formation.

In a video leaked by some media institutions, Aoun was seen chatting with Caretaker Prime Minister Hassan Diab and telling him that Hariri lied when he said that he presented a government lineup to the president.

“There is no formation… [Hariri] said that he gave me a paper… He is lying... He made false statements... and traveled to Turkey,” Aoun was heard as telling Diab during their meeting on Monday.



Biden, Macron to Declare 60-Day Ceasefire between Hezbollah, Israel on Tuesday

 Smoke and flame rise after an Israeli airstrike on Beirut's southern suburbs, known as Dahiyeh, Monday, Nov. 25, 2024. (AP)
Smoke and flame rise after an Israeli airstrike on Beirut's southern suburbs, known as Dahiyeh, Monday, Nov. 25, 2024. (AP)
TT

Biden, Macron to Declare 60-Day Ceasefire between Hezbollah, Israel on Tuesday

 Smoke and flame rise after an Israeli airstrike on Beirut's southern suburbs, known as Dahiyeh, Monday, Nov. 25, 2024. (AP)
Smoke and flame rise after an Israeli airstrike on Beirut's southern suburbs, known as Dahiyeh, Monday, Nov. 25, 2024. (AP)

US President Joe Biden and French President Emmanuel Macron will declare on Tuesday morning a 60-day ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon, Asharq Al-Awsat learned from widely informed sources on Monday.

Washington has spoken of “cautious optimism” that the US proposal for a ceasefire could be a success. The proposal calls for Hezbollah’s withdrawal from the area between the Blue Line and Litani River in a manner that can be verified. In return Israeli forces will withdraw from the regions they occupied since they carried out their limited invasion of Lebanon.

The discussions the US government had on the Lebanon-Israel ceasefire were positive and are headed in the right direction towards a deal, the White House said on Monday.

"We're close," said White House national security spokesperson John Kirby. "The discussions ... were constructive, and we believe that the trajectory of this is going in a very positive direction. But, yeah, nothing is done until everything is done." 

The relative positivity prevailed in spite of the ongoing wide-scale military operations between Israel and Hezbollah in the South and Israel’s air raids deep in Lebanese territory. Hezbollah has also fired rockets deep in Israel, reaching Tel Aviv.

Analysts have said the intense attacks suggest that both Israel and Hezbollah are trying to maximize their leverage as diplomats conduct what they hope is a final round of ceasefire talks, reported the New York Times on Monday.

The New York Times reported on Friday that the terms included a 60-day truce during which Israeli forces and Hezbollah fighters pull back from border areas and the Lebanese Army and a United Nations peacekeeping force increase their presence in a buffer zone.

But officials have also warned that the two sides may not be able to finalize a deal, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has faced pressure from right-wing allies not to end the military campaign.

Israel’s hard-line national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, said in a social media post on Monday that the proposed deal would be a “historic missed opportunity to eradicate Hezbollah.”

Observers meanwhile told Asharq Al-Awsat that all pending issues related to the US proposal have been resolved from the Lebanese side, while Israel has some lingering reservations.

Israeli officials said Netanyahu’s security Cabinet is set to convene on Tuesday to discuss the ceasefire proposal.

Two officials confirmed the Cabinet meeting is set for Tuesday, but they said it is still not clear whether the decision-making body will vote to approve the deal.

The officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were discussing internal deliberations.