Turkey Voices Support to Ending Libya Conflict, Still Sends Mercenaries to Back GNA

A fighter loyal to the GNA. (Reuters)
A fighter loyal to the GNA. (Reuters)
TT

Turkey Voices Support to Ending Libya Conflict, Still Sends Mercenaries to Back GNA

A fighter loyal to the GNA. (Reuters)
A fighter loyal to the GNA. (Reuters)

The Turkish presidency expressed on Sunday its hope for an end to the conflict in Libya and formation of a transitional government as soon as possible.

However, its support was undermined by reports that cited Ankara’s continued dispatching of mercenaries from Syria to Libya to prop up the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA), headed by Fayez al-Sarraj, against the Libyan National Army (LNA), commanded by Khalifa Haftar.

Turkish presidential spokesman Ibrahim Kalin said Ankara will continue to support Libyan talks and offer all sorts of support to advance the political process.

“We hope that a new model to manage the country would be formed and that the conflict would be completely resolved. Libya boasts major capabilities … and should it invest them properly, it will be able to rise economically, achieve its security and become an influential force in North Africa,” he added.

The United Nations announced on Saturday that participants at the Libyan peace talks have agreed on the candidates to head the transitional government, which will be tasked with holding elections in the end of the year.

Meanwhile, American journalist Lindsey Snell reported that despite its alleged support to end the conflict, Turkey was still sending mercenaries to Libya.

In a tweet on Saturday, she said that Sultan Murad militants in Hawar Kilis were being “crossed to Turkey to be transferred to Libya” in spite of the ceasefire agreement reached in October.

“The ceasefire agreement in Libya stipulates that all foreign mercenaries must be expelled. Turkey’s bringing more in,” she said.

She also posted photos of a member of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham group, which has been listed a terrorist by Turkey. In the first photo, the fighter is seen carrying a flag of the group and in the other, he is seen wearing a Turkish flag patch.



Uncertainty Surrounds Fate of Burhan-Hemedti Meeting in Kampala

General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, leader of the Sudanese army, and Rapid Support Forces chief Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (File Photo)
General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, leader of the Sudanese army, and Rapid Support Forces chief Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (File Photo)
TT

Uncertainty Surrounds Fate of Burhan-Hemedti Meeting in Kampala

General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, leader of the Sudanese army, and Rapid Support Forces chief Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (File Photo)
General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, leader of the Sudanese army, and Rapid Support Forces chief Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (File Photo)

Sudanese politicians expect an imminent meeting between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Kampala in response to an African Union (AU) Peace and Security Council decision and an invitation from a committee led by Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and African regional leaders.

The meeting aims to unite General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan of the army and General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as “Hemedti,” of the RSF.

There’s been silence from army leaders despite the announcement over a week ago, suggesting a division within the army between those wanting to end the war and those preferring its continuation, reportedly with support from militant Islamist factions.

The AU Peace and Security Council decision on June 21 established a committee chaired by Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni to facilitate direct communication between Sudanese army leaders and the RSF.

Despite over a week passing since the AU’s decision, the Sudanese army and interim government have not responded, maintaining their usual silence in such situations.

Political analyst and lawyer Hatem Elias told Asharq Al-Awsat that “there appears to be a divergence between political and military decisions within the army, influenced significantly by Islamist factions.”

“Accepting Museveni’s invitation could potentially lead to a confrontation with these factions,” warned Elias.

Elias suggested that the silence might be due to “concerns within the army leadership about a risky clash with Islamist elements.”

Moreover, the army rejects AU initiatives, citing Sudan’s suspended membership.

Museveni’s initiative isn't the first African attempt to reconcile Sudan’s army and the RSF.

On December 11, 2023, the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) announced a planned meeting between Burhan and Hemedti, which was later postponed.

The army, on December 27 of that year, stated Djibouti, IGAD’s chair, notified them of the delay just a day before the meeting. Since then, the army has accused the RSF leader of stalling and ignoring calls to halt Sudan’s destruction.

The army rejects similar arrangements and insists on continuing fighting until the RSF is disbanded. Meanwhile, the RSF leader advocates for peace talks and readiness to engage in discussions to end hostilities.