‘Kingmaker’ Lebanese MP Michel Murr Passes Away from COVID-19

Michel al-Murr. (NNA)
Michel al-Murr. (NNA)
TT

‘Kingmaker’ Lebanese MP Michel Murr Passes Away from COVID-19

Michel al-Murr. (NNA)
Michel al-Murr. (NNA)

Lebanese MP Michel al-Murr, known as the “kingmaker” in local politics, passed away on Sunday after succumbing to the coronavirus after being infected weeks ago.

The 88-year-old politician was already suffering from poor health, with the virus putting an end to an eventful political career that spanned decades.

“Abou Elias,” as he was popularly known, served as minister in several government, acted as deputy prime minister between 1990 and 2000 and deputy parliament speaker in 2004 and headed various ministerial committees. He also took part in the national dialogue that was launched by former President Michel Suleiman, whose support from Murr helped him secure the presidency.

Murr enjoyed close ties with several former presidents, including Elias Sarkis, whom he called a friend, slain Bashir Gemayel in the 1980s, Elias al-Hrawi in the 1990s and Emile Lahoud, whose daughter married his son Elias. Murr and Lahoud’s ties would sour during the end of the latter’s tenure and their children’s union would also end in divorce.

A deft politician, Murr was quick to form alliances, while also making rivalries along the way. He imposed himself as the leading politician, or “zaim”, in the northern Metn region in Mount Lebanon, holding sway for several years and garnering him a sizable popular base.

An Orthodox Christian, this popularity helped him win seats in various elections in the predominantly Maronite region. He also took advantage of the absence of a powerful Christian figure in the area in the post-civil war (1975-90) period until 2005 to further tighten his grip.

During the war, he was among three signatories of the Tripartite Accord with Damascus, which cemented Syria’s hold over Lebanon. The agreement was also signed by future Speaker Nabih Berri, as head of the Amal Movement, Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblatt, and then leader of the Lebanese Forces Elie Hobeika.

In the 1990s, Murr was victim of a failed assassination attempt. His son Elias would also be targeted in a failed attack in 2005. Assassinations in Lebanon are usually blamed on the Syrian regime that had imposed its hegemony over the country from 1976 to 2005.

The motives behind the attacks were different, as Murr senior boasted good ties with former President Hafez Assad. Elias’ case is being addressed by the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, which was formed to tackle the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. His murder is widely blamed on Syria.

Michel Murr’s road to politics was not always smooth. He ran twice for elections in 1960 and 1964, failing in both tries. The third time was the charm and he won a seat in the legislature in 1968 after forming an alliance with Pierre Gemayel.

In post-civil war Lebanon, he ran for the Orthodox seat in Aley and would continue to secure electoral victories until his death.

His electoral run in the 2018 polls was fraught with challenges from the Free Patriotic Movement, Lebanese Forces, Kataeb and civil society groups.

Murr’s bloc lost seats in parliament with the FPM’s rise on the political scene in 2005. At one point the MP allied himself with the movement, before abandoning it and declaring himself an independent.

Despite the challenge mounted by the FPM, Murr’s popularity in the Metn did not wane and he managed to secure a lone seat for himself in the last parliamentary elections.

His legacy is expected to live on in the Metn region where his daughter Mirna is head of the northern Metn municipalities union.

Similar to the majority of Lebanese politicians, Murr’s career was not without controversy, corruption and illicit accumulation of wealth. Among these glaring examples was his naturalization of hundreds of Syrians in 1994 when he served as interior minister so that they could vote for him during elections.



Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
TT

Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)

Baghdad has been preoccupied this week with serious possibilities that Israel may expand its war on Gaza and Lebanon by striking several targets in Iraq in retaliation to attacks by Iran-backed armed factions.

Concern has been high that Israel may attack government buildings, oil fields and strategic locations, not just the positions of the armed factions that have previously launched attacks against Israel, said sources close to the pro-Iran ruling Coordination Framework.

Media sources have spoken of government speculation that Iraq could come under “300 Israeli attacks”.

The fears in Iraq have been compounded by an Israeli complaint to the United Nations Security Council against seven armed factions and holding Baghdad responsible for the attacks they have carried out against it.

This prompted the government, through the foreign ministry, to send an official letter to the Security Council, UN Secretary-General, Arab League and Organization of Islamic Cooperation in response to the Israeli threats.

The ministry said on Saturday that Iraq is “the cornerstone of stability in the region and world and it is one of the countries that are most committed to the UN Charter.”

“The Zionist entity’s letter to the Security Council is part of a systematic policy aimed at creating claims and excuses in an attempt to expand the conflict in the region.”

It said Iraq has turned to the Security Council out of Iraq’s keenness on the international body carrying out its duty in maintaining international peace and security and the need to rein in the “Zionist aggression in Gaza and Lebanon.”

Moreover, it stressed that Iraq has been keen on exercising restraint when it comes to the use of its airspace to attack a neighboring country.

Israel has used Iraqi airspace to launch attacks against Iran in October.

Iraq underscored the importance of the international community stepping in to “stop this hostile behavior that is a flagrant violation of international law.”

It called for international efforts to stop the Israeli escalation in the region and ensure that international laws and treaties are respected to consolidate security and stability.

Meanwhile, a source close to the Coordination Framework said the main Shiite parties are taking the Israeli threats “very seriously”, urging Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's government to take “all the necessary measures to avert a potential Israeli strike.”

All leaders of armed factions, as well as Shiite leaders, have taken up alternative locations and are moving under great secrecy, confirming that they have changed the majority of their military positions, said the source.

It also dismissed claims that Israeli jets have overflown Iraq, saying nothing has been confirmed, but not ruling out the possibility, especially since US forces have control over Iraqi skies and Iraq is helpless against stopping these violations.

Iraq had submitted a formal complaint to the UN and Security Council over Israel’s use and violation of its airspace to attack Iran.

Analyst and former diplomat Ghazi Faisal said the pro-Iran armed factions have been gathering their forces in the Sinjar province, which is strategic for Iran’s arms deliveries and logistic support to Syria where attacks can be carried out against American forces and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

Sinjar is one of the most important strategic bases for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, he added.

Furthermore, he noted that the armed factions insist on continuing the war against Israel, rejecting government calls for calm and neutrality.

The government’s statements are aimed at delivering a message that it “is not directly responsible for the strategy of these factions,” which follow Iran’s policies.

Iraq has repeatedly said that it refuses for its territory to be used to attack another country, but some observers believe that it may allow Iran to do so should Israel strike.