Lebanon: Slim’s Assassination Stirs Wave of Angry Reactions

An undated handout picture provided by Loqman Slim’s office, shows Slim, a prominent Lebanese activist who was found dead in his car in south Lebanon on February 4, 2021. (AFP)
An undated handout picture provided by Loqman Slim’s office, shows Slim, a prominent Lebanese activist who was found dead in his car in south Lebanon on February 4, 2021. (AFP)
TT

Lebanon: Slim’s Assassination Stirs Wave of Angry Reactions

An undated handout picture provided by Loqman Slim’s office, shows Slim, a prominent Lebanese activist who was found dead in his car in south Lebanon on February 4, 2021. (AFP)
An undated handout picture provided by Loqman Slim’s office, shows Slim, a prominent Lebanese activist who was found dead in his car in south Lebanon on February 4, 2021. (AFP)

The assassination of Lebanese intellectual and political activist Loqman Slim stirred widespread political condemnation in Lebanon, while no comment was issued by Hezbollah on the crime.

However, a tweet by Jawad Nasrallah, the son of the party’s secretary general, aroused anger in the Lebanese street, amid political warnings of “Lebanon’s sliding into a series of assassinations targeting activists and opponents.”

Jawad Nasrallah wrote on his Twitter account after the killing of Slim: “The loss of some is in fact profit and unmatched kindness,” accompanied by a hashtag: “No regrets.”

The tweet sparked angry reactions, so Nasrallah deleted it, justifying it as related to “a personal matter.”

Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri condemned the killing of the political activist, saying on his Twitter account: “Loqman Slim is a new martyr on the path to freedom and democracy in Lebanon, and his assassination is no different from assassinations of his predecessors.”

“Loqman Slim was clearer than everyone else, perhaps in determining the danger to the homeland. He did not compromise nor retreat. He offered his blood and pure soul for Lebanon’s salvation… We, and all sovereigns, will continue the battle for freedom. Denunciation is no longer enough, and what is required is to uncover the criminals to stop the malevolent killing machine.”

In turn, the Lebanese Forces party denounced the assassination of the “sovereign activist”, calling on the security forces to reveal the circumstances of “this horrific crime and bring the criminals to justice.”

The Lebanese Kataeb party described Slim as “a free thinker,” saying in a statement: “This crime is considered as a return to the series of political assassinations and a miserable attempt to strike diversity and the other opinion as well as to silence people of free voices calling for the establishment of a sovereign and independent state.”

The Free Patriotic Movement (FPM), for its part, urged the judicial and security agencies to complete the investigations as quickly as possible, in order to achieve justice, stressing that the crime should not be used to incite discord.

The media office of the Amal Movement denounced in a statement the assassination, calling for a security and judicial investigation to reveal and punish the perpetrators.



Sudan Rejects UN Call for 'Impartial' Force to Protect Civilians

Smoke rises in Omdurman, near Halfaya Bridge, during clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the army as seen from Khartoum North, Sudan April 15, 2023. REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah
Smoke rises in Omdurman, near Halfaya Bridge, during clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the army as seen from Khartoum North, Sudan April 15, 2023. REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah
TT

Sudan Rejects UN Call for 'Impartial' Force to Protect Civilians

Smoke rises in Omdurman, near Halfaya Bridge, during clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the army as seen from Khartoum North, Sudan April 15, 2023. REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah
Smoke rises in Omdurman, near Halfaya Bridge, during clashes between the Rapid Support Forces and the army as seen from Khartoum North, Sudan April 15, 2023. REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah

Sudan has rejected a call by UN experts for the deployment of an "independent and impartial force" to protect millions of civilians driven from their homes by more than a year of war.

The conflict since April last year, pitting the army against Rapid Support Forces, has killed tens of thousands of people and triggered one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.

The independent UN experts said Friday their fact-finding mission had uncovered "harrowing" violations by both sides, "which may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity".

They called for "an independent and impartial force with a mandate to safeguard civilians" to be deployed "without delay".

The Sudanese foreign ministry, which is loyal to the army under General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, said in a statement late Saturday that "the Sudanese government rejects in their entirety the recommendations of the UN mission."

It called the UN Human Rights Council, which created the fact-finding mission last year, "a political and illegal body", and the panel's recommendations "a flagrant violation of their mandate".

According to AFP, the UN experts said eight million civilians have been displaced and another two million people have fled to neighboring countries.

More than 25 million people -- upwards of half the country's population -- face acute food shortages.

World Health Organization chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, on a visit to Sudan on Sunday, said: "The scale of the emergency is shocking, as is the insufficient action being taken to curtail the conflict and respond to the suffering it is causing."

In Port Sudan, where government offices and the United Nations have relocated to due to the intense fighting in the capital Khartoum, Tedros called on the "world to wake up and help Sudan out of the nightmare it is living through".

The Sudanese foreign ministry statement accused the Rapid Support Forces, led by Burhan's former deputy Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, of "systematically targeting civilians and civilian institutions".

"The protection of civilians remains an absolute priority for the Sudanese government," it said.

The statement added that the UN Human Rights Council's role should be "to support the national process, rather than seek to impose a different exterior mechanism".

It also rejected the experts' call for an arms embargo.