RSF Deputy Head Recounts Events Leading up to Bashir’s Overthrow

RSF Deputy Head Abdul Rahim Hamdan Dagalo, Asharq Al-Awsat
RSF Deputy Head Abdul Rahim Hamdan Dagalo, Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

RSF Deputy Head Recounts Events Leading up to Bashir’s Overthrow

RSF Deputy Head Abdul Rahim Hamdan Dagalo, Asharq Al-Awsat
RSF Deputy Head Abdul Rahim Hamdan Dagalo, Asharq Al-Awsat

Sudanese protesters who overthrew their country’s former regime under Omar al-Bashir were surprised when the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) pointed their guns away from them a few days after the December 19 revolution erupted in 2018.

The RSF was initially established by Bashir himself for protection, but it sided with the massive protests against the regime.

When the security taskforce was first summoned to Khartoum, demonstrators were afraid that the RSF was seeking to quell their protests by force. But they were soon taken aback by the RSF actually offering them protection.

Speaking from the capital’s southern suburbs on December 25, 2018, RSF Commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, who also goes by Hemetti, reassured anti-regime revolutionaries that his forces were not in Khartoum to kill them.

“The RSF did not come to kill or participate in the suppression of protesters,” said Hemetti in a definitive statement that some considered as one of the earliest serious acts in opposition to Bashir’s leadership.

After successfully toppling Bashir’s regime, demonstrators were chanting in support of the RSF. The support, however, was short-lived.

Protesters were enraged by the RSF possibly partaking in disbanding a sit-in on June 3, 2019. RSF officers and commanders repeatedly denied the accusations and blamed anti-revolution forces.

Abdul Rahim Hamdan Dagalo, the deputy head of the RSF and Hemetti’s brother, recounted the early days of the revolution in Sudan and how he was forced to cut short a trip to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) after Hemetti’s decision to publicly back protesters against Bashir.

According to Dagalo, his brother’s outspoken support for anti-regime moves had placed his life at risk.

“When I inquired about what he had done, he told me that he will not stand by criminals and that he was prepared for the consequences,” Dagalo told Asharq Al-Awsat.

As the revolution gained traction, it triggered a violent response from Bashir’s regime. The repression and killing of protesters surged across the country’s streets and neighborhoods.

“A storm was brewing among army ranks, and it was aggravated by Bashir’s speech on February 22, 2019,” Dagalo noted.

In his speech, Bashir declared a national emergency for one year and dissolved local and national governments. He also vowed to rule impartially and introduce radical economic measures.

Despite his pledges, Bashir failed to regain the confidence of the opposition.

Following Bashir’s speech, Dagalo and Hemetti headed to visit the defense ministry, where Ahmed Awad Ibn Auf, then serving as defense minister, reprimanded Hemetti for backing the protests.

“I spoke the truth,” Hemetti told Auf, according to Dagalo. Auf responded by warning Hemetti not to do it again.

Hemetti, during the meeting with Auf, described what was happening as “oppression and treason to the people.”

“This is not how we move the country forward,” Hemetti told Auf, warning that Sudan can slip away from everyone’s hand.

Auf went on to agree with Hemetti’s views on blaming government policies for what was happening in the country and proposed forming a higher security committee.

A committee of high-ranking officers and commanders, which included Hemetti, was formed. An executive branch for the committee was also established with the task of breaking up protests.

“During the committee’s first meeting, attendees were enthusiastic about getting the RSF to help with coercing the revolution and protesters,” Dagalo noted, adding that he strongly rejected the notion.

“We will not partake in oppressing revolutionaries,” he told deputy head of security Jalal al-Sheikh at the meeting.

Hemetti reaffirmed that the RSF will not chase down protesters but agreed to Auf’s request on providing an RSF patrol to support security efforts.

He, however, later withdrew the patrol shortly before a wave of organized protests erupted. Hemetti was keen on RSF personnel not clashing with protesters.



Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich has told Asharq Al-Awsat that the US does not plan to withdraw its forces from Syria.

The US is committed to “the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with,” he said.

Here is the full text of the interview.

Question: Mr. Goldrich, thank you so much for taking the time to sit with us today. I know you are leaving your post soon. How do you assess the accomplishments and challenges remaining?

Answer: Thank you very much for the chance to talk with you today. I've been in this position for three years, and so at the end of three years, I can see that there's a lot that we accomplished and a lot that we have left to do. But at the beginning of a time I was here, we had just completed a review of our Syria policy, and we saw that we needed to focus on reducing suffering for the people in Syria. We needed to reduce violence. We needed to hold the regime accountable for things that are done and most importantly, from the US perspective, we needed to keep ISIS from reemerging as a threat to our country and to other countries. At the same time, we also realized that there wouldn't be a solution to the crisis until there was a political process under resolution 2254, so in each of these areas, we've seen both progress and challenges, but of course, on ISIS, we have prevented the reemergence of the threat from northeast Syria, and we've helped deal with people that needed to be repatriated out of the prisons, and we dealt with displaced people in al-Hol to reduce the numbers there. We helped provide for stabilization in those parts of Syria.

Question: I want to talk a little bit about the ISIS situation now that the US troops are still there, do you envision a timeline where they will be withdrawn? Because there were some reports in the press that there is a plan from the Biden administration to withdraw.

Answer: Yeah. So right now, our focus is on the mission that we have there to keep ISIS from reemerging. So I know there have been reports, but I want to make clear that we remain committed to the role that we play in that part of Syria, to the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with, and to the need to prevent that threat from reemerging.

Question: So you can assure people who are saying that you might withdraw, that you are remaining for the time being?

Answer: Yes, and that we remain committed to this mission which needs to continue to be pursued.

Question: You also mentioned the importance of humanitarian aid. The US has been leading on this. Are you satisfied with where you are today on the humanitarian front in Syria?

Answer: We remain committed to the role that we play to provide for humanitarian assistance in Syria. Of the money that was pledged in Brussels, we pledged $593 million just this past spring, and we overall, since the beginning of the conflict, have provided $18 billion both to help the Syrians who are inside of Syria and to help the refugees who are in surrounding countries. And so we remain committed to providing that assistance, and we remain keenly aware that 90% of Syrians are living in poverty right now, and that there's been suffering there. We're doing everything we can to reduce the suffering, but I think where we would really like to be is where there's a larger solution to the whole crisis, so Syrian people someday will be able to provide again for themselves and not need this assistance.

Question: And that's a perfect key to my next question. Solution in Syria. you are aware that the countries in the region are opening up to Assad again, and you also have the EU signaling overture to the Syrian regime and Assad. How do you deal with that?

Answer: For the United States, our policy continues to be that we will not normalize with the regime in Syria until there's been authentic and enduring progress on the goals of resolution 2254, until the human rights of the Syrian people are respected and until they have the civil and human rights that they deserve. We know other countries have engaged with the regime. When those engagements happen, we don't support them, but we remind the countries that are engaged that they should be using their engagements to push forward on the shared international goals under 2254, and that whatever it is that they're doing should be for the sake of improving the situation of the Syrian people.

Question: Let's say that all of the countries decided to talk to Assad, aren’t you worried that the US will be alienated in the process?

Answer: The US will remain true to our own principles and our own policies and our own laws, and the path for the regime in Syria to change its relationship with us is very clear, if they change the behaviors that led to the laws that we have and to the policies that we have, if those behaviors change and the circumstances inside of Syria change, then it's possible to have a different kind of relationship, but that's where it has to start.

Question: My last question to you before you leave, if you have to pick one thing that you need to do in Syria today, what is it that you would like to see happening today?

Answer: So there are a number of things, I think that will always be left and that there are things that we will try to do, to try to make them happen. We want to hold people accountable in Syria for things that have happened. So even today, we observed something called the International Day for victims of enforced disappearances, there are people that are missing, and we're trying to draw attention to the need to account for the missing people. So our step today was to sanction a number of officials who were responsible for enforced disappearances, but we also created something called the independent institution for missing persons, and that helps the families, in the non-political way, get information on what's happened. So I'd like to see some peace for the families of the missing people. I'd like to see the beginning of a political process, there hasn't been a meeting of the constitutional committee in two years, and I think that's because the regime has not been cooperating in political process steps. So we need to change that situation. And I would, of course, like it's important to see the continuation of the things that we were talking about, so keeping ISIS from reemerging and maintaining assistance as necessary in the humanitarian sphere. So all these things, some of them are ongoing, and some of them remain to be achieved. But the Syrian people deserve all aspects of our policy to be fulfilled and for them to be able to return to a normal life.