US: Russia Blocks Syria Chemical Weapons Use Accountability

US ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield  | Photo Credit: AFP
US ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield | Photo Credit: AFP
TT

US: Russia Blocks Syria Chemical Weapons Use Accountability

US ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield  | Photo Credit: AFP
US ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield | Photo Credit: AFP

The United States accused Syrian President Bashar Assad and his close ally Russia on Thursday of trying to block all efforts to hold Damascus accountable for using chemical weapons during attacks on civilians.

US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield told the UN Security Council that "the Assad regime has tried to avoid accountability by obstructing independent investigations and undermining the role and work of the OPCW," the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons which is the international chemical weapons watchdog.

She accused Russia of defending Assad "despite its chemical weapons attacks," obstructing independent investigations, and undermining efforts to hold the Syrian government accountable not only for using chemical weapons but for "numerous other atrocities."

OPCW investigators blamed three chemical attacks in 2017 on Assad´s government in April 2020. The OPCW Executive Council responded by demanding that Syria provide details. When it didn´t, France submitted a draft measure on behalf of 46 countries in November to suspend Syria´s "rights and privileges" in the global watchdog which means it would lose its vote. It will be considered at the April meeting of the OPCW´s 193 member states.

Syria joined the Chemical Weapons Convention in September 2013, pressed by Russia after a deadly chemical weapons attack that the West blamed on Damascus. By August 2014, the Assad government declared that the destruction of its chemical weapons was completed. But Syria´s initial declaration of its chemical stockpiles and chemical weapons production sites to the OPCW has remained in dispute.

UN High Representative for Disarmament Affairs Izumi Nakamitsu told the council that issues related to Syria´s declaration "remain outstanding" including a chemical weapons production facility that the Syrian government declared "as never having been used for the production of chemical weapons."

She said, however, that analysis of information and all materials gathered by the OPCW Declaration Assessment Team since 2014 "indicates that production and/or weaponization of chemical warfare nerve agents did, in fact, take place at this facility."

The team asked Syria "to declare the exact types and quantities of chemical agents produced and/or weaponized at this site," but no response has been received, Nakamitsu said.

Russia´s UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia accused some countries, which he didn´t name, of repeatedly using the chemical weapons "card" as a tool to pressure the Syrian government, using grave accusations "backed up by unconvincing evidence like video footage on social media or `testimony´ of knowingly biased witnesses, or falsified facts."

At the same time, he said, "they reject the counter-arguments provided not only by Russia and Syria, but also by independent experts and organizations, and do not give any coherent explanation as to why they do so."

Nebenzia reiterated Russia's accusations that the OPCW and its technical experts have become the "transmitter of anti-Syrian claims of the Western countries" -- an allegation strongly denied by Nakamitsu, US ambassador Thomas-Greenfield, and many other speakers.

"The root cause of the problem is that our Western colleagues have long turned Syria´s chemical file into a means of punishment of the unwanted authorities in Damascus," the Russian ambassador said. "Therefore, attempts to establish the connection between the file and actual use or non-use of chemical weapons are absolutely senseless."

Syria´s new UN ambassador, Bassam al-Sabbagh, who served as his country´s envoy to the OPCW for seven years after 2013, stressed the government´s condemnation of the use of chemical weapons and denial that it ever used chemical weapons.

He said Syria has made "tangible progress" in resolving issues in its initial declaration and expressed regrets that some countries "always see the glass half empty and don´t hesitate to criticize rather than applaud progress achieved."

France´s UN Ambassador Nicolas De Riviere countered that "the Syrian regime is still lying, hiding the truth and evading its international obligations." He emphasized "the need to fight impunity."

He sharply criticized "the unfounded accusations" against the OPCW, saying "they are undignified and, above all, they are irresponsible."

"The Security Council has a historic responsibility for the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and the re-emergence of chemical weapons in the world is a major threat," De Riviere said. "We cannot allow these weapons to become commonplace."



Yemen Hopes to End Banking Split, Fears Houthi Obstacles

The Central Bank of Yemen in Aden (government media)
The Central Bank of Yemen in Aden (government media)
TT

Yemen Hopes to End Banking Split, Fears Houthi Obstacles

The Central Bank of Yemen in Aden (government media)
The Central Bank of Yemen in Aden (government media)

While Houthi naval attacks have stalled Yemen’s peace process, a new UN agreement between the government and the Houthi militias on banking and aviation issues has sparked hope among many Yemenis.

UN envoy Hans Grundberg announced earlier this week the agreement, which aims to de-escalate tensions and address issues with commercial banks and Yemenia Airways.

However, he did not provide details on when or where these talks would take place, only stating that both sides agreed to begin discussions on economic and humanitarian issues based on a new roadmap.

Yemenis have shown mixed reactions to the new de-escalation agreement, but many are hopeful it will address key economic issues, such as the financial divide and unpaid salaries in Houthi-controlled areas, problems that have persisted for eight years.

A report from the Sanaa Center for Strategic Studies, written by Nade Wali, presented conflicting views.

It suggested the agreement resulted from coalition pressures on the government to favor the Houthis, but also cited Grundberg, who warned that Yemen’s economic split could lead to severe consequences.

Grundberg noted that isolating banks and exchange companies from the global financial system could harm businesses and remittances.

The report highlighted Yemen’s economic paralysis due to a decade of conflict, with the use of two currencies and varying exchange rates complicating matters. It warned that any further pressures could worsen the humanitarian situation and disrupt aid.

Western sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Saudi Arabia supports the roadmap to end Yemen’s crisis, stressing that disputes are not the way to peace.

Najat, a Yemeni teacher who only gave Asharq Al-Awsat her first name, avoided the debate over the agreement.

She believes that successful economic talks could bring real relief, especially for those in Houthi-controlled areas who haven’t received salaries since 2016.

Najat hopes both sides will address the suffering of millions of Yemenis due to economic hardship and agree on resuming oil and gas exports, establishing a mechanism for salary payments, and ending the financial divide, seeing this as the path to peace.