South Koreans Hope to Keep Late Samsung Chief’s $1.8 Bln Art Collection

People walk past a spider sculpture by artist Louise Bourgeois at the Samsung Group's Leeum Gallery in Seoul June 22, 2012. (Reuters)
People walk past a spider sculpture by artist Louise Bourgeois at the Samsung Group's Leeum Gallery in Seoul June 22, 2012. (Reuters)
TT

South Koreans Hope to Keep Late Samsung Chief’s $1.8 Bln Art Collection

People walk past a spider sculpture by artist Louise Bourgeois at the Samsung Group's Leeum Gallery in Seoul June 22, 2012. (Reuters)
People walk past a spider sculpture by artist Louise Bourgeois at the Samsung Group's Leeum Gallery in Seoul June 22, 2012. (Reuters)

A South Korean art critic was astounded when he saw the private art collection of the late Samsung Electronics chairman, after being asked to value it this year.

“The reason many go to the Louvre is to see the Mona Lisa, and the Sistine Chapel, the Creation of Adam. There are valuable masterpieces that can compare to that in the Lee collection,” said the critic, who declined to be identified.

The head of the Samsung conglomerate, Lee Kun-hee, died in October leaving an art collection estimated to be worth more than 2 trillion won ($1.76 billion), including masterpieces by Picasso, Monet and Warhol, the critic and another person directly involved in the appraisal told Reuters.

Former culture ministers and art groups have called for a new law that would allow the family to donate the art in lieu of at least part of the 11 trillion won ($9.72 billion) bill for inheritance tax for listed stockholdings alone they are expected to be landed with.

The aim is to keep the collection in South Korea for exhibition. Putting it up for auction would inevitably mean much going overseas, they said.

“If we don’t have a system in place allowing tax payment by artwork, we’ll lose the collection,” said Lee Kwang-soo, president of the Korean Fine Arts Association.

The family’s law firm, Kim & Chang, has engaged three art groups to appraise the collection, which includes Korean treasures.

According to the two people involved in the appraisal, the collection of about 12,000 items includes works covering the “flow of Western art history” by Renoir, Chagall, Alberto Giacometti, Rothko, Gerhard Richter and Damien Hirst, with some pieces valued at more than 100 billion won ($88 million).

The collection’s total price tag of an estimated 2 trillion won ($1.76 billion) or more far exceeds the $835.1 million that the Rockefeller collection sold for at Christie’s in 2018.

The two people involved in the appraisal declined to be identified as the proceedings were private. Kim & Chang declined to comment.

Aiming for masterpieces
Lee had a particular collection philosophy as he accumulated over about 40 years, wrote Lee Jong-seon, a former deputy director of the Samsung Group’s museum, the Leeum Gallery, who helped Lee build his collection, in his book “Lee Collection”.

His father, Samsung founder Lee Byung-chul, preferred ancient Korean art and did not buy items he deemed too expensive. But Lee Kun-hee “did not weigh the price”, rather thinking: “If there are masterpieces, the status of the entire collection will rise.”

“Lee Kun-hee’s philosophy was to aim for masterpieces ... I think his collection philosophy also translated into Samsung’s management ideology of being No. 1,” Lee wrote.

The Lee family is expected to report on the inheritance tax bill by April.

The family is expected to try to pay the bill in installments over five years in an effort to retain his shareholdings in Samsung affiliates to maintain control of the conglomerate, in particular global tech giant Samsung Electronics.

Some countries allow taxes to be paid with artwork and offer tax breaks for art donations but not South Korea, said lawyer Park Joo-hee, who specializes in the arts.

Art experts blame the lack of such tax rules for leaving South Korea’s National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art “without even a single Picasso engraving”.

The president of Art Market Research Institute, So Jin-su, said that based on the budget for artwork bought by South Korean museums in 2019, it would take the entire museum network up to 132 years to buy the Lee collection.

Draft legislation was introduced after Lee’s death but there has been little progress on it. Even if passed, it is not clear if the family would want to donate the collection in return for tax breaks, given the sums it might fetch, experts say.

Choe Byong-suh, visiting professor at Sungkyunkwan University, said he hoped some arrangement could be worked out to keep the collection in South Korea.

“This is a rare chance to establish a landmark museum,” he said.



Belgrade's Landmark Hotel Yugoslavia Faces Likely Demolition, With Many Opposed

A woman walks past Hotel Yugoslavia, once a symbol of progress in the former socialist state of Yugoslavia that broke apart in the 1990s and a favorite gathering place for local residents as well as world leaders, in Belgrade, Serbia, Thursday, Oct. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)
A woman walks past Hotel Yugoslavia, once a symbol of progress in the former socialist state of Yugoslavia that broke apart in the 1990s and a favorite gathering place for local residents as well as world leaders, in Belgrade, Serbia, Thursday, Oct. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)
TT

Belgrade's Landmark Hotel Yugoslavia Faces Likely Demolition, With Many Opposed

A woman walks past Hotel Yugoslavia, once a symbol of progress in the former socialist state of Yugoslavia that broke apart in the 1990s and a favorite gathering place for local residents as well as world leaders, in Belgrade, Serbia, Thursday, Oct. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)
A woman walks past Hotel Yugoslavia, once a symbol of progress in the former socialist state of Yugoslavia that broke apart in the 1990s and a favorite gathering place for local residents as well as world leaders, in Belgrade, Serbia, Thursday, Oct. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)

Belgrade’s iconic Hotel Yugoslavia, once a symbol of progress in the former socialist state of Yugoslavia that broke apart in the 1990s and a favorite gathering place for local residents as well as world leaders, now stands in eerie silence awaiting its likely demolition.
The once-bustling landmark — a leading example of modernist architecture when it was built in the 1960s — has fallen into disrepair, its future clouded by debates over its historical significance and the push for advanced development.
Its white facade, once polished and welcoming, is marred by crumbling concrete and graffiti. Inside, debris litters once-pristine red carpeted floors, while scattered pieces of broken furniture hint at the opulence that once filled its rooms and lobbies: Faded velvet armchairs, torn bed mattresses, sagging curtains and broken windows are all that remain of the luxury that once was. The wood-paneled presidential suite where top dignitaries would stay is now home to pigeons that fly in through the shattered glass.
As the Serbian capital grapples with hectic growth and new high-rises that dot its skyline, the almost certain fate of the hotel has sparked controversy, with some seeing it as a relic worth preserving and others envisioning new possibilities rising from its ruins.
In its heyday after it received its first guests in 1969, it was a five-star hotel boasting one of the biggest chandeliers in the world made of 40,000 Swarovski crystals and 5,000 bulbs.
Its guest list included Queen Elizabeth II, United States Presidents Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter, astronauts including Neil Armstrong, and Belgian and Dutch royals.
The hotel, with a spectacular view of the Danube River in the capital's New Belgrade district, was damaged in NATO bombing in 1999 in an armed intervention over Serbia’s bloody crackdown on Kosovo Albanian separatists.
Only parts of the hotel were fully renovated, and it kept receiving guests until a few months ago, when private investors announced plans to demolish the structure and build a new one in its place. Two 150-meter (500-foot) -tall towers containing a luxury hotel, offices and private apartments will be built, according to the new owners.
Asked why the landmark hotel needs to be completely destroyed instead of incorporated into the new project, Zivorad Vasic, a spokesperson for the investors, said there were several reasons.
"One is during the bombing in 1999, quite a lot of parts of the hotel were destroyed. Second, the hospitality industry completely and tremendously changed. When you look at hotels now and how they looked before, they were completely different,” he said.
Architect and tourist guide Matija Zlatanovic, who often takes tourists to the hotel to explain its rich history, said the plans for the new hotel are “quite controversial," especially because “there are valid concerns about the size of the buildings that are going to be erected here.”
“It follows the trend of towerization of Belgrade and the erection of enormous high rises all over," he said. “And we yet have to see about the impact that they’re going to have on this neighborhood.”
Neighbors who face living in the future shadows of the planned skyscrapers are not happy. Some are holding weekly protests against the new project, saying they will stop the demolition with their bodies if necessary.
Svetlana Gojun, one of the protesters, said Hotel Yugoslavia “represents a huge part of our history.”
“Half the world came to this hotel, from actors, musicians, politicians, writers,” she said. “Everyone is tied to this hotel. The whole world knows about that hotel. And now we will allow something like that to disappear?”