'Super Mario' Theme Park Opens in Japan

The attraction is part of the existing Universal Studios Japan amusement park in the western city of Osaka. Reuters
The attraction is part of the existing Universal Studios Japan amusement park in the western city of Osaka. Reuters
TT

'Super Mario' Theme Park Opens in Japan

The attraction is part of the existing Universal Studios Japan amusement park in the western city of Osaka. Reuters
The attraction is part of the existing Universal Studios Japan amusement park in the western city of Osaka. Reuters

Here we go! After months of pandemic delays, Nintendo's first ever theme park, featuring a "Mario Kart" ride in a real-life Bowser's Castle, opened in Japan on Thursday to delighted fans.

The attraction, whose bright, block-like surroundings are straight out of the classic "Super Mario" games, is part of the existing Universal Studios Japan amusement park in the western city of Osaka.

"We perfectly recreated the world of the game.... You'll find life-sized piranha plants and Bowser, and you'll see what it is like to be Mario," said Ayumu Yamamoto, USJ's marketing communication manager.

"It took almost a year longer than we had expected to open this place, and we are really glad," he told reporters at a preview on Wednesday.

The new zone called "Super Nintendo World" had originally been expected to draw big crowds last year ahead of the Tokyo 2020 Olympics, which was also postponed by the coronavirus.

But its launch was pushed back to February, and then delayed again as Japan's government declared a state of emergency in early 2021 to curb spiking cases.

Music from the popular Mario games plays throughout the park and a smartphone-linked wristband allows visitors to collect virtual coins by punching blocks, just like the Italian plumber.

Augmented reality goggles attached to a plastic red visor are used in the "Mario Kart" ride, one of the park's main draws that promises to bring the racing game to life.

The ride follows a track around the foreboding castle of Mario's enemy Bowser, an evil turtle, but each seat has a steering wheel and players can collect and shoot items at opponents.

The zone also boasts a ride based on the cute green dinosaur Yoshi, a Peach's castle, Mario-themed restaurants and lifesize characters from the Mushroom Kingdom.

Fans told AFP they were thrilled about the much-anticipated opening of the park, which cost more than 60 billion yen ($550 million), according to USJ.

"I've been playing Mario since I was a boy. I didn't expect that I could enter the world of Mario, so I'm very excited," said Hiroki Kono, a 19-year-old university student in Osaka.

- 'Waited for this day' -

Office worker Rei Higashimoto, 25, was also delighted about the launch. "I have an annual pass, so I knew this Mario world was being created, and I have waited from one year ago for this day to come," she said.

Similar areas are planned at Universal Studios parks in Orlando and Hollywood.

The first "Super Mario Bros" game came out in 1985 for Nintendo's NES console.

The platform game, in which Mario runs and jumps past obstacles to collect coins and save Princess Peach from the evil Koopa turtles, was based on the "Mario Bros" arcade game released earlier.

Since then, Mario has appeared in myriad formats including games featuring racing, football and golf.

Shigeru Miyamoto, the creator of "Super Mario Bros", took a tour of the park in a promotional video released in December.

"At last, it's complete! It makes a big impression, seeing the park in real life," said Miyamoto, describing himself as Mario's "Dad" as he popped out of a giant green pipe.

"There are smaller activities like the coin block, as well as bigger ones... If you manage to get three keys from various activities, you can take on the final activity -- a battle with Bowser Jr."

"I'm very excited for all of you to experience the park on your own," he added.



Beatles' Grammy Nod Spotlights Music Industry's AI Debates

News that The Beatles would release the song "Now and Then" with an AI assist triggered excitement for some fans but outrage among others, as some jumped to the conclusion that deepfakes were involved. Paul ELLIS / AFP/File
News that The Beatles would release the song "Now and Then" with an AI assist triggered excitement for some fans but outrage among others, as some jumped to the conclusion that deepfakes were involved. Paul ELLIS / AFP/File
TT

Beatles' Grammy Nod Spotlights Music Industry's AI Debates

News that The Beatles would release the song "Now and Then" with an AI assist triggered excitement for some fans but outrage among others, as some jumped to the conclusion that deepfakes were involved. Paul ELLIS / AFP/File
News that The Beatles would release the song "Now and Then" with an AI assist triggered excitement for some fans but outrage among others, as some jumped to the conclusion that deepfakes were involved. Paul ELLIS / AFP/File

The Fab Four broke up more than half-a-century ago and only two members are living, but they are among the contenders for the Grammy celebrating the year's best record, a head-scratching nomination that highlights the Recording Academy's ongoing debate on how to handle artificial intelligence.

News that The Beatles would release the song "Now and Then" with an AI assist triggered excitement for some fans but outrage among others, as some jumped to the conclusion that deepfakes were involved.

That isn't the case: "Now and Then" was made using "stem separation," a type of AI technology that allowed for cleaning up the decades old, lo-fi demo plagued by excess noise, reported AFP.

They used it to isolate John Lennon's vocals from the unwanted bits of the recording, making it usable.

Creators then added electric and acoustic guitar recorded in 1995 by the late George Harrison, completing the song with drums from Ringo Starr and bass, piano and slide guitar from Paul McCartney, along with additional backing vocals.

And the Recording Academy behind the Grammys gala -- set for Sunday in Los Angeles -- deemed it eligible to win Record of the Year, one of the night's top prizes, as well as Best Rock Performance.

'Elements of AI material' eligible

The institution has been grappling for years with AI's implications for the music industry, as many artists voice serious concern over the ethics of music generated by the technology.

The Academy released a ruling in 2023 that "only human creators are eligible" to be considered for Grammys.

"A work that contains no human authorship is not eligible in any categories," read the detailed rules.

But, it adds, "a work that features elements of AI material (i.e. material generated by the use of artificial intelligence technology) is eligible in applicable categories."

The takeaway: as it stands, work created with purely generative AI isn't eligible.

Songs touched by AI tools that polish rather than create -- like "Now and Then" -- can be considered.

As McCartney has put it regarding the Beatles track: "Nothing has been artificially created."

'Slippery slope'

Nashville singer-songwriter Mary Bragg told AFP the type of technology used on "Now and Then" is quite common, calling its development a real "a-ha moment" for producers and engineers.

She said the tool is used routinely enough that the shock in media coverage over its use on the Beatles song was a bit overwrought.

Still, Bragg said the implications of AI tools in music remains a "big deal, because it is a new realm that we're all existing in now."

The questions are far-reaching and "it is certainly a slippery slope," she told AFP. "You have people learning about what's possible more and more."

"If the integrity of the art is not preserved, that's when it's of major concern."

At the forefront of artists' concerns are issues like their work being used without clear permission or to train AI software, or their likeness being forged, with Bragg calling those examples "definitely part of the slippery slope category."

Linda Bloss-Baum, a lecturer at American University and a member of the board of directors of the Songwriters of North America, said many aspects of AI worry her -- but not the tech used on the Beatles track.

"There's a lot of bad that can come to artists from AI, but this is an example of something really good," she said.

"I think it's a really good example of how AI can come to benefit artists, if they so want," she added about the song, which was made with permission from the estates of Lennon and Harrison.

The announcement that The Beatles were in the running for one of the top Grammys triggered some eyerolls from industry watchers and social media users over the nomination of a legacy act alongside, or instead of, contemporary acts.

But the Grammys are an industry award and not fan-chosen -- and sometimes nominations have a behind-the-scenes thought process that makes sense to Academy members even if it leaves the general public puzzled.

For one thing, Bragg noted that the prize for Record of the Year goes to song engineers and producers as well as the artists.

Including The Beatles is "a nod to what is likely to be the case in the future in the world of recording," she said.

Several of the acts up for the prize have been nominated before but never won it, including Beyonce, Lamar and...The Beatles.

It's the group's fifth chance in the category; the last time was in 1971, for "Let It Be."