Poll: Fatah, Hamas Face Headwinds ahead of Palestinian Vote

In this Feb. 10, 2021 file photo, poll workers from the Central Elections Commission register a local resident to the electoral roll, on the main road of Gaza City. (AP)
In this Feb. 10, 2021 file photo, poll workers from the Central Elections Commission register a local resident to the electoral roll, on the main road of Gaza City. (AP)
TT

Poll: Fatah, Hamas Face Headwinds ahead of Palestinian Vote

In this Feb. 10, 2021 file photo, poll workers from the Central Elections Commission register a local resident to the electoral roll, on the main road of Gaza City. (AP)
In this Feb. 10, 2021 file photo, poll workers from the Central Elections Commission register a local resident to the electoral roll, on the main road of Gaza City. (AP)

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah party and his Hamas rivals would each fall well short of a parliamentary majority if elections are held in May, forcing them to partner with each other or smaller parties to form a government, according to a poll released Tuesday.

Abbas has decreed Palestinian elections for May 22 in what would be the first general vote since Hamas won a landslide victory in 2006. The process appears to be on track, but disputes between the long-feuding factions could cause the vote to be delayed or canceled.

The poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research found that if elections were held today a single Fatah list would win 43% of the vote and Hamas would win 30%, with 18% of voters undecided.

But a faction led by Mohammed Dahlan, a former senior Fatah leader who had a falling out with Abbas, would win 10%. Nasser al-Kidwa, who was kicked out of Fatah after forming his own list, would win 7%. They would mainly draw votes from Fatah, dropping its share to around 30%, the poll said.

The well-regarded PCPSR carried out face-to-face interviews with 1,200 Palestinians across the occupied West Bank and Gaza, with a margin of error of 3%.

PCPSR director Khalil Shikaki said Fatah is seen as best able to address most of voters' top concerns, including restoring national unity, improving the economy and lifting the Israeli blockade of Gaza that was imposed after Hamas seized power in 2007. But Fatah's internal rivalries could weaken it vis-à-vis the more disciplined and unified Hamas.

“Both Fatah and Hamas have major problems,” Shikaki told reporters. “Hamas' main problem is the perception that it cannot address the major challenges. Fatah's major problem is the splits.”

He said it appears unlikely that even a late swing toward Hamas would be enough for the group to repeat its shock victory of 2006. That led to months of factional bickering culminating in a week of street battles in Gaza in which Hamas drove out forces loyal to Abbas.

Since then, Hamas' rule of Gaza has eroded its popularity, and the lavish lifestyle adopted by some of its exiled leaders means it can no longer campaign as a scrappy underdog that puts its principles ahead of material comforts.

“It seems clear that Hamas does not have a chance to have a majority in the parliament,” Shikaki said, adding that the most likely scenario would be a national unity government or a Fatah-led coalition including smaller parties.

He cautioned, however, that unforeseen events — such as a prisoner exchange between Hamas and Israel or Israel's targeted killing of a senior militant — could swing public opinion in Hamas' favor between now and the election.

It's unclear how the international community would respond to the formation of a government led by or including Hamas, which has fought three wars with Israel and is considered a terrorist group by Western countries. The international boycott of Hamas following the 2006 elections was one of the main factors driving the internal rift.

Shikaki said most voters seem to have taken the possible consequences of a Hamas victory into consideration, which may account for some of Fatah's popularity.

“People's decisions regarding which party to vote for seem to be clearly based on cost-benefit calculations,” he said.



International Call Made for Sudanese Army, RSF to Hold Indirect Negotiations

Sudanese people fled Sennar towards the city of Gadarif (AFP)
Sudanese people fled Sennar towards the city of Gadarif (AFP)
TT

International Call Made for Sudanese Army, RSF to Hold Indirect Negotiations

Sudanese people fled Sennar towards the city of Gadarif (AFP)
Sudanese people fled Sennar towards the city of Gadarif (AFP)

Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) announced its initial consent to an invitation by the United Nations to hold indirect talks with the Sudanese army over the humanitarian situation in the country.

The negotiations are expected to take place next week in Geneva, but the army made no statement on the matter.

A member of the RSF negotiating team told Asharq Al-Awsat that the forces welcomed the invitation of UN Special Envoy Ramtane Lamamra to hold a series of indirect discussions over the humanitarian conditions in the country.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, stressed that the RSF “accepted, in principle, any call that aims to alleviate the sufferings of the Sudanese people,” without taking into account statements made by Army Commander Abdel Fattah al-Burhan about his rejection to talks that would lead to ending the war.

Speaking on Tuesday in a military air base, Al-Burhan said that his army would not succumb to any blackmail through negotiations that put its authority and will at stake and do not meet the people’s aspirations.

Last week, the UN called on the Sudanese army and the RSF to hold indirect talks, to review the means to facilitate the access of aid to the war-stricken population and protect civilians.

Lamamra addressed a letter to Burhan, on June 26, in which he proposed sending a high-raking delegation to Geneva on July 10 to start discussions with the RSF, under UN auspices.

His step comes in line with UN Security Council Resolution 2736, which “calls on the parties to the conflict to allow and facilitate the rapid, safe, unhindered and sustained passage of humanitarian relief for civilians in need.”