Damascus Uncooperative with Lebanon’s Request to Demarcate Land Borders

 Syrian President Bashar al-Assad speaks as he meets with the Syrian cabinet in Damascus, March 30, 2021. (SANA/Handout via Reuters)
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad speaks as he meets with the Syrian cabinet in Damascus, March 30, 2021. (SANA/Handout via Reuters)
TT

Damascus Uncooperative with Lebanon’s Request to Demarcate Land Borders

 Syrian President Bashar al-Assad speaks as he meets with the Syrian cabinet in Damascus, March 30, 2021. (SANA/Handout via Reuters)
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad speaks as he meets with the Syrian cabinet in Damascus, March 30, 2021. (SANA/Handout via Reuters)

With the revival of talks about the demarcation of the maritime borders between Lebanon and Syria - after Damascus signed an oil exploration agreement in the exclusive maritime economic zone between the two countries - legitimate questions rose about the Syrian regime’s readiness to enter into serious negotiations with Lebanon to resolve the dispute.

Observers are awaiting the outcome of a recent call between Lebanese President Michel Aoun and his Syrian counterpart Bashar Al-Assad, and if the latter would decide to postpone the negotiations until Lebanon reaches an agreement with Israel over the disputed maritime areas.

Assad had previously stated that the land borders demarcation between Lebanon and Syria must start from the occupied Shebaa Farms and the Kfarshouba hills, in a direct response to the outcome of the Lebanese dialogue conference held in April 2006 upon the invitation of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri.

Then-US envoy to Syria, Frederick Hoff, quoted Assad as saying that the Shebaa Farms and Kfarshouba hills belonged to Syria. The Syrian president did not deny the statement.

At the time, leaders who participated in the first dialogue conference told Asharq Al-Awsat that they agreed on the necessity of demarcating the land borders between the two countries, but they responded to the wish of Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, who asked to replace the word demarcation with delineation, as the first is used between two rival states, as he said.

The leaders affirmed that Nasrallah pledged to contact the Syrian leadership for this purpose.

However, Damascus reiterated its readiness to discuss the demarcation of the land borders between the two countries, with the exception of the Shebaa Farms and the Kfarshouba hills, in an attempt to circumvent the pressure demanding it to deposit a document to the United Nations recognizing that the Shebaa Farms belonged to Lebanon.

The designation of Prime Minister Saad Hariri to head the first government following the agreement between Saudi Arabia and Syria constituted an occasion to reopen the issue of demarcating the land borders between the two countries, starting with the northern region.

At that time, it was decided to form a Lebanese committee headed by Minister Jean Hogasapian, in exchange for Damascus’ willingness to form a similar committee of politicians and soldiers.

However, these committees failed to hold any executive meetings, until Syria decided to turn against Hariri, with the resignation of its allies, along with the ministers of the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM), from the government.

Damascus has not shown goodwill since the arrival of General Michel Aoun to the Presidency. The latter maintained communication with Damascus through former Minister of State for Presidential Affairs Pierre Raffoul, who travels from time to time to the Syrian capital.

Moreover, the Syrian regime closes the door to the Lebanese calls to demarcate the borders in light of the increase in the number of illegal crossings that promote organized smuggling into Syrian territories.



Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
TT

Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)

Israel’s insistence that France can not be a member of the international committee that will monitor a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon is due to a series of French practices that have disturbed Israel recently, political sources in Tel Aviv revealed.
These practices are most notably attributed to the French judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, who has joined other judges to unanimously issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, the sources revealed.
“The Israeli government is following with concern the French role at The Hague,” they said, noting that veteran French lawyer Gilles Devers led a team of 300 international lawyers of various nationalities who volunteered to accuse Israel of “committing war crimes and crimes against humanity.”
According to the Israeli Maariv newspaper, Israeli officials believe that Devers, who signed the arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Galant, would not have dared to do so without having received a green light from French President Emmanuel Macron.
Israeli sources also mentioned other reasons for Israel’s anger at France, such as the government’s decision to bar Israeli firms from exhibiting at the Euronaval arms show near Paris earlier this month.
French officials have repeatedly said that Paris is committed to Israel's security and point out that its military helped defend Israel after Iranian attacks in April and earlier this month.
Paris has so far also refused to recognize the Palestinian state. But the Israeli government is not satisfied. It wants France to follow the United States and blindly support its war in Gaza and Lebanon.
Tel Aviv also feels incredibly confident that France should be punished, and therefore, decided that Paris could not participate in the Lebanese ceasefire agreement, knowing that the Israeli government itself has traveled to Paris several times begging for its intervention, especially during the war on Lebanon.
Meanwhile, an air of optimism has emerged in Israel around the chances for an end to the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon following negotiations led by US envoy Amos Hochstein.
But any optimism relies on Netanyahu’s final decision. The PM is still conducting talks with his friends and allies of the far right who reject the ceasefire agreement and instead, demand that Lebanese citizens not be allowed to return to their villages on the border with Israel. They also request that a security belt be turned into a permanently depopulated and mined zone.
Hochstein Talks
Meanwhile, political sources in Israel claim that what is holding up a ceasefire deal so far is Lebanon. According to Israel's Channel 12, Hochstein expressed a “firm stance” during his talks with the Lebanese side. The envoy delivered clear terms that were passed on to Hezbollah, which the channel said “led to significant progress” in the talks.
Israeli officials said that Tel Aviv is moving towards a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon with Hezbollah in the coming days.
The channel said that during his late visit to Tel Aviv, coming from Beirut after talks with Speaker Nabih Barri, Hochstein said, “I placed before them (Lebanese officials) a final warning, and it seems to have been effective.”
Iran Obstacle
Despite the “positive atmosphere,” informed diplomatic sources pointed to a major obstacle: Iran.
Channel 12 quoted the sources as saying that Lebanon has not yet received the final approval required from Iran, which has significant influence over Hezbollah.

According to the draft proposal, the Lebanese Army must be redeployed to the south and carry out a comprehensive operation to remove weapons from villages. The US Central Command (CENTCOM) forces will “supervise and monitor the implementation of the operation.”
Channel 12 said Israel believes that such details could still derail the agreement. It also said that Hezbollah could violate the truce.
“In such cases, Israel would have to conduct military operations inside the Lebanese territory,” the channel reported, adding that “one of the unsettled issues is related to the committee that will oversee the implementation of the agreement between Israel and Lebanon.”
The sources said Tel Aviv “insists that France is not part of the agreement, nor part of the committee that will oversee its implementation.”