Turkey Eyes 'Acceleration' in Rapprochement With Cautious Egypt

Turkish Deputy Foreign Ministry Sedat Onal, seated right, meets with Hamdi Sanad Loza, Egyptian deputy foreign minister, along with their delegations, at the Egyptian Foreign ministry (AP)
Turkish Deputy Foreign Ministry Sedat Onal, seated right, meets with Hamdi Sanad Loza, Egyptian deputy foreign minister, along with their delegations, at the Egyptian Foreign ministry (AP)
TT

Turkey Eyes 'Acceleration' in Rapprochement With Cautious Egypt

Turkish Deputy Foreign Ministry Sedat Onal, seated right, meets with Hamdi Sanad Loza, Egyptian deputy foreign minister, along with their delegations, at the Egyptian Foreign ministry (AP)
Turkish Deputy Foreign Ministry Sedat Onal, seated right, meets with Hamdi Sanad Loza, Egyptian deputy foreign minister, along with their delegations, at the Egyptian Foreign ministry (AP)

Turkey and Egypt concluded their "exploratory talks” that discussed the necessary steps leading to the normalization of relations between the two countries.

Following the meeting, Turkish officials showed a desire to "accelerate" the steps of rapprochement with Cairo, while the Egyptian officials remained cautious.

The Egyptian Foreign Ministry described the talks as "frank and in-depth," while Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar said that his country's relations with Cairo will reach high levels soon.

Speaking at a meeting with the special forces, Akar asserted that relations with Egypt are developing, and “this pleases a friend and gives confidence, and at the same time it frightens some.”

Akar said that there may have been a pause in the relations between the two countries for several reasons.

He noted his confidence that this will be overcome in a short time, pointing out that the development of relations between Ankara and Cairo would be extremely beneficial and necessary for Turkey, Libya, and Egypt.

Similarly, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu announced the beginning of a “new period” after the conclusion of the Cairo talks, adding that a meeting at the level of foreign ministers will possibly be held between the two sides.

Cavusoglu emphasized that the meetings “were held in a positive atmosphere."

"Our friends discussed bilateral relations and what could be done about it.”

However, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said there was a will to expand and develop the relations, focusing more on the ties between the two people.

"We are making efforts to restore our historic relations not as enemies but as friends,” he said.

Relations between Cairo and Ankara have been strained since 2013, leading to a reduction of diplomatic relations, after Erdogan took a stance against the June 30 Revolution that toppled the late Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi.

Researcher at al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, Karam Saeed, believes that there is some sort of contradiction in the Turkish statements.

He explained that the defense and foreign ministers speak of full normalization and understanding on several regional issues, while Erdogan is limiting the issue to cultural and history-related matters.

Saeed told Asharq Al-Awsat that this disparity will force Cairo to be more cautious in dealing with Turkish steps.

Last September, Turkey began hinting at wanting to reach an “understanding” or “hold meetings” with Egypt.

In response, Cairo said that it was keen on maintaining the close relationship between the two peoples, but the political situation and positions of some Turkish officials were negative, calling for “real actions.”

The researcher explained that Egypt remains doubtful of the Turkish moves, especially after the visit of the Turkish foreign and defense ministers to Libya in conjunction with the launch of the talks in Cairo.

Saeed added that the steps that Turkey has taken within the framework of controlling the media and political behavior of the Muslim Brotherhood members residing in Turkey, is not enough for Cairo.

This remains a point of contention and a step that must be addressed in the path of understanding, according to Saeed.



Israel Says Military Operation Against Hezbollah 'Still Not Complete'

A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
TT

Israel Says Military Operation Against Hezbollah 'Still Not Complete'

A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki

Israel's defense minister said on Friday that the campaign against Hezbollah was not yet complete, just hours after a 10-day ceasefire came into force in Lebanon.

He also warned that if the fighting resumed, displaced residents returning to the country's war-torn south would have to evacuate again.

"The ground maneuver into Lebanon and the strikes on Hezbollah have achieved many gains, but they are still not complete," Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a broadcast statement.

There remained areas of the south that had not yet been cleared of Hezbollah militants, which would have to happen one way or another, he added.

"The area between the security zone and the Litani (River) line, which is currently under our control, has not yet been cleared of terrorists and weapons," Katz warned.

"This will have to be carried out either through diplomatic means or by continued IDF activity once the ceasefire ends."

As the truce took effect at midnight (2100 GMT), thousands of displaced Lebanese civilians began heading south, hoping to return to their homes.

But Katz said a fresh bout of fighting could force them to leave again.

"If the fighting resumes, those residents who return to the security zone will have to be evacuated to allow completion of the mission," AFP quoted him as saying.

According to details of the truce released by the US State Department, Israel reserves the right to continue targeting Hezbollah to prevent "planned, imminent, or ongoing attacks".

Israel, whose troops are occupying parts of southern Lebanon, has also said it will maintain a 10-kilometer (six-mile) security zone it has established along the border.

"The security zone has been cleared of militants and weapons, is empty of residents, and will continue to be cleared of terrorist infrastructure, including the destruction of homes in front-line villages that have effectively become terrorist outposts," Katz said.

The details of the truce also stipulate that Lebanon "with international support... will take meaningful steps to prevent Hezbollah" from undertaking any attacks against Israeli targets.


Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 
Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 
TT

Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 
Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 

Beirut MPs representing most of Lebanon’s political parties met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free,” following recent security incidents and Israeli strikes.

The conference brought together most factions, except MPs from Hezbollah, the Amal Movement and Al-Jamaa al-Islamiya.

Despite political divisions, participants struck a unified rhetoric, calling for all weapons to be placed exclusively under state control and for a stronger presence of official institutions, chiefly the Lebanese Army, across the capital to ensure stability and restore public confidence in security.

MP Fouad Makhzoumi said Beirut “deserves to be protected together” and would remain “a city that embraces everyone,” describing the “Black Wednesday” as a serious warning of the risks still facing the capital.

He called for the army to deploy across all neighborhoods, for checkpoints to be reinforced and for effective security oversight, stressing that state-building requires a monopoly on arms “without exception.”

He further stressed all necessary measures should be taken to restore order, “up to declaring general mobilization if needed.”

For his part, MP Ghassan Hasbani of the Lebanese Forces said the meeting reflected a national stance tied to the responsibility of representing Beirut’s residents. He voiced support for state efforts to assert full authority, confiscate illegal weapons and treat any armed activity outside state control as a direct threat to the capital’s security and stability.

Kataeb Party lawmaker Nadim Gemayel noted that Lebanon should no longer be used as a bargaining chip by external actors, calling for firm implementation of government decisions and for the army to deploy across the country, starting with Beirut, to protect citizens and reinforce sovereignty.

Similarly, MP Ibrahim Mneimneh said Hezbollah had dragged Lebanon into a conflict unrelated to it, exposing the country to heavy losses, while Beirut and other regions paid the price in security and stability. He stressed that the current phase required restoring state authority and ensuring its exclusive control over arms.

MP Waddah Sadeq said the Lebanese “have the right to loyalty to Lebanon alone,” urging support for what he described as “historic” government decisions. He called for unity under a state based on institutions and the rule of law, and for security forces to fully carry out their duties.

MP Nicolas Sehnaoui of the Free Patriotic Movement highlighted the need for an inclusive national approach to rebuild trust in the state, stressing that limiting arms to the army and legitimate forces remains essential, while avoiding exclusionary rhetoric.

Lawmaker Edgar Traboulsi said Beirut, despite wars and crises, “does not die,” but needs unity and solidarity free from division and incitement.

MP Faisal Sayegh of the Progressive Socialist Party stated that Beirut’s security is inseparable from Lebanon’s, calling for adherence to sovereignty and independence and implementation of the Taif Agreement and relevant government decisions.


Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat
Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat
Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat

Beirut MPs representing most of Lebanon’s political parties met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free,” following recent security incidents and Israeli strikes.

The conference brought together most factions, except MPs from Hezbollah, the Amal Movement and Al-Jamaa al-Islamiya.

Despite political divisions, participants struck a unified rhetoric, calling for all weapons to be placed exclusively under state control and for a stronger presence of official institutions, chiefly the Lebanese Army, across the capital to ensure stability and restore public confidence in security.

MP Fouad Makhzoumi said Beirut “deserves to be protected together” and would remain “a city that embraces everyone,” describing the “Black Wednesday” as a serious warning of the risks still facing the capital.

He called for the army to deploy across all neighborhoods, for checkpoints to be reinforced and for effective security oversight, stressing that state-building requires a monopoly on arms “without exception.”

He further stressed all necessary measures should be taken to restore order, “up to declaring general mobilization if needed.”

For his part, MP Ghassan Hasbani of the Lebanese Forces said the meeting reflected a national stance tied to the responsibility of representing Beirut’s residents. He voiced support for state efforts to assert full authority, confiscate illegal weapons and treat any armed activity outside state control as a direct threat to the capital’s security and stability.

Kataeb Party lawmaker Nadim Gemayel noted that Lebanon should no longer be used as a bargaining chip by external actors, calling for firm implementation of government decisions and for the army to deploy across the country, starting with Beirut, to protect citizens and reinforce sovereignty.

Similarly, MP Ibrahim Mneimneh said Hezbollah had dragged Lebanon into a conflict unrelated to it, exposing the country to heavy losses, while Beirut and other regions paid the price in security and stability. He stressed that the current phase required restoring state authority and ensuring its exclusive control over arms.

MP Waddah Sadeq said the Lebanese “have the right to loyalty to Lebanon alone,” urging support for what he described as “historic” government decisions. He called for unity under a state based on institutions and the rule of law, and for security forces to fully carry out their duties.

MP Nicolas Sehnaoui of the Free Patriotic Movement highlighted the need for an inclusive national approach to rebuild trust in the state, stressing that limiting arms to the army and legitimate forces remains essential, while avoiding exclusionary rhetoric.

Lawmaker Edgar Traboulsi said Beirut, despite wars and crises, “does not die,” but needs unity and solidarity free from division and incitement.

MP Faisal Sayegh of the Progressive Socialist Party stated that Beirut’s security is inseparable from Lebanon’s, calling for adherence to sovereignty and independence and implementation of the Taif Agreement and relevant government decisions.