Israel’s ‘Shadow War’ on Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Gets More Complicated

A number of new generation Iranian centrifuges are seen on display during Iran's National Nuclear Energy Day in Tehran (Reuters)
A number of new generation Iranian centrifuges are seen on display during Iran's National Nuclear Energy Day in Tehran (Reuters)
TT

Israel’s ‘Shadow War’ on Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Gets More Complicated

A number of new generation Iranian centrifuges are seen on display during Iran's National Nuclear Energy Day in Tehran (Reuters)
A number of new generation Iranian centrifuges are seen on display during Iran's National Nuclear Energy Day in Tehran (Reuters)

Israel’s shadow war on nuclear facilities in the depth of Iranian territories is getting more complicated as Tehran announced last Wednesday it foiled a sabotage operation against one of its centrifuge manufacturing sites before Israeli sources confirmed the attack has caused considerable damage.

Quoting an Iranian familiar with the operation and a senior intelligence official, The New York Times said Thursday that the attack was carried out by a small quadcopter drone and it targeted one of the country’s main manufacturing centers for the production of centrifuges used at the two nuclear facilities, Fordow and Natanz.

According to the newspaper, the drone took off from inside Iran, from a location not far from the site and hit the structure. However, the person familiar with the attack did not know what, if any, damage had resulted.

Later, other media outlets hinted that Israel was behind the attack on the Iranian factory, which is believed to produce aluminum blades for use in Natanz and Fordow.

Channel 13 said Israel was behind the attack, describing it as the first operation carried out by Tel Aviv against Iran under the new government of Naftali Bennett.

The Jerusalem Post said that the sabotage operation against Iran’s nuclear facilities has caused major damage, despite Iranian denials.

It wrote that a 2017 Institute for Science and International Security report by founder and director David Alrbight and former International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) official Olli Heinonen stated that in 2011, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran revealed the location as one of Iran’s centrifuge manufacturing sites, near the city of Karaj, referred to as the TABA site.

In its article, the New York Times said that although no one claimed responsibility for the attack, the Iranian centrifuge factory, known as the Iran Centrifuge Technology Company, or TESA, was on a list of targets that Israel presented to the Trump administration early last year.

The newspaper said that among the targets presented to Trump’s administration at the time, were attacks on the uranium enrichment site at Natanz and the assassination of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh in November and an attack on the Natanz plant the following April, damaging a large number of centrifuges.



After Netanyahu Arrest Warrant, Israelis Fear Military Officers’ Prosecution

Israel fears its officers may also be prosecuted after an arrest warrant was issued for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Israeli Government Press Office - AFP)
Israel fears its officers may also be prosecuted after an arrest warrant was issued for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Israeli Government Press Office - AFP)
TT

After Netanyahu Arrest Warrant, Israelis Fear Military Officers’ Prosecution

Israel fears its officers may also be prosecuted after an arrest warrant was issued for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Israeli Government Press Office - AFP)
Israel fears its officers may also be prosecuted after an arrest warrant was issued for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Israeli Government Press Office - AFP)

Israeli leaders from both the ruling coalition and opposition have strongly reacted to the International Criminal Court’s decision to issue arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant on war crimes charges related to Gaza.

While these immediate reactions dominate the news, Israel’s judicial authorities, military courts, and experts are carefully studying the decision, with growing concerns about its broader consequences.

The main concern among Israelis is that the court has determined the actions in Gaza were war crimes against humanity, including starvation, lack of medical care, and mass killings.

While Netanyahu and Gallant are seen as the key figures responsible, many others are involved. These include senior and junior military leaders, as well as soldiers who shared images on social media boasting about their actions against Palestinians.

Any of them could be arrested if complaints are made against them in other countries.

A growing network of global volunteers, including many Israeli Jews, is mobilizing against the war and its atrocities. These individuals have gathered detailed information on the officers involved, such as their identities, passport numbers, and travel plans.

This data is stored online, ready to be used if needed. They plan to use this information to push for the arrest of any officer traveling abroad.

This strategy has been tested three times in the past month. The first was in Belgium, where an Israeli-Belgian dual citizen involved in the Gaza conflict was investigated. Two weeks ago, a similar case occurred in Nicosia with an Israeli holding Cypriot citizenship.

Last week, an Israeli reserve officer was nearly arrested while on his honeymoon in Cyprus. This officer had boasted about his actions in Gaza and posted a photo saying, “We will burn Gaza to the ground.”

A Belgian organization tracked him and sought his arrest. The Israeli Mossad intervened, quickly having him deported before the arrest could happen.

In addition to these risks, Israeli officials are concerned about how the ICC ruling will affect Netanyahu’s leadership.

If the US accepts him, who else will? Which world leader will risk meeting him now? How can Netanyahu lead if he’s isolated internationally?

Experts have suggested that Israel may have to prepare for a future without Netanyahu, predicting the ICC ruling signals the beginning of the end of his leadership.