Iraq: 'Iranian Factions' Divided Over Response to US Strikes

Iraqi Popular Mobilization Units march during a parade marking the annual Quds Day, or Jerusalem Day, in Baghdad, Iraq, June 23, 2017. - REUTERS/Khalid al Mousily
Iraqi Popular Mobilization Units march during a parade marking the annual Quds Day, or Jerusalem Day, in Baghdad, Iraq, June 23, 2017. - REUTERS/Khalid al Mousily
TT

Iraq: 'Iranian Factions' Divided Over Response to US Strikes

Iraqi Popular Mobilization Units march during a parade marking the annual Quds Day, or Jerusalem Day, in Baghdad, Iraq, June 23, 2017. - REUTERS/Khalid al Mousily
Iraqi Popular Mobilization Units march during a parade marking the annual Quds Day, or Jerusalem Day, in Baghdad, Iraq, June 23, 2017. - REUTERS/Khalid al Mousily

The pro-Iranian Popular Mobilization factions in Iraq failed to reach a consensus on the military response to the US air raid that targeted the headquarters of a faction on the Iraqi-Syrian border last week.

The leaders of the factions held successive meetings to discuss the timing of the response, without reaching an agreement, as some parties warned against “delicate and difficult calculations” that might open the door to “more severe” US strikes.

However, high-ranking sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the meetings witnessed sharp differences between leaders, who wanted a quick and strong strike, and others who called for the need to study the dangerous repercussions of a continued confrontation, noting that the US strike increased the division and confusion among the factions.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, a leader in the Al-Fateh Alliance said that the division of the leaders was focused on two main points.

Some saw that ignoring the US raid would weaken the factions’ influence vis-à-vis the Iraqi government, while others cautioned that any response would mean that the next blow of the Biden administration would be inevitably fatal.

The leader claims that a number of faction senior members “have new security data regarding the nature of the US moves, which gives the impression that Washington’s concessions with Iran do not mean the cessation of military strikes against its interests in Iraq, especially against the Popular Mobilization camps.”

On Monday, the US Department of Defense said that the strikes it had carried out were necessary and deliberate against Iranian-backed factions, in response to drone attacks, noting that the targeted camps were used by Kataeb Hezbollah and Sayyid al-Shuhada.



Lebanon’s Berri: Resolution 1701 Stands Unchanged

Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meets with US envoy Amos Hochstein during his recent visit to Beirut (AFP)
Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meets with US envoy Amos Hochstein during his recent visit to Beirut (AFP)
TT

Lebanon’s Berri: Resolution 1701 Stands Unchanged

Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meets with US envoy Amos Hochstein during his recent visit to Beirut (AFP)
Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meets with US envoy Amos Hochstein during his recent visit to Beirut (AFP)

Lebanon is monitoring Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s response to US President Joe Biden’s push for a ceasefire in southern Lebanon.

Biden has sent advisors Amos Hochstein and Brett McGurk to Tel Aviv to discuss the matter with Netanyahu, marking what Lebanese officials see as the last chance for progress before the US presidential election on Nov. 5.

Lebanese leaders, including Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Najib Mikati, are cautious about predicting results.

Mikati did not comment after his recent meetings with US advisors.

However, Berri highlighted Lebanon’s prior agreement with Hochstein to a ceasefire, deploying the Lebanese army in the south, and enforcing UN Resolution 1701.

Berri reaffirmed that Lebanon won’t alter these terms, saying, “What’s agreed is agreed; Resolution 1701 stands unchanged.”

The speaker clarified that Lebanon has fulfilled its commitments and is now waiting for Netanyahu’s response, noting that Lebanon is ready to implement the ceasefire if Hochstein can secure Netanyahu’s agreement.

“The ball is now in Netanyahu’s court,” Berri said, pointing out that Netanyahu has previously agreed to and then withdrawn from ceasefire deals.

According to sources, Hezbollah is fully behind Berri’s mandate for a ceasefire.

Hezbollah’s newly appointed Secretary-General, Sheikh Naim Qassem, recently confirmed the party’s support.

Qassem is closely following developments with the party’s military leadership, while Hezbollah’s MPs continue discussions with other blocs to clarify their position.

Lebanese sources stressed that reaching a ceasefire is critical and must happen as soon as possible, asserting that Netanyahu should not leverage the situation in Gaza as a pretext to avoid a southern ceasefire.

As Biden’s envoys prepare to meet with Netanyahu, Lebanese officials remain focused on whether this effort will result in an agreement.

The ongoing clashes near the southern Lebanese town of Khiam, where Hezbollah is actively resisting Israeli advances, have intensified the situation, making the outcome of these discussions crucial.