Hashimoto's Gold No Match for Biles' Bronze

Gold medalist Daiki Hashimoto of Japan poses in front of the Olympic rings. (Reuters)
Gold medalist Daiki Hashimoto of Japan poses in front of the Olympic rings. (Reuters)
TT

Hashimoto's Gold No Match for Biles' Bronze

Gold medalist Daiki Hashimoto of Japan poses in front of the Olympic rings. (Reuters)
Gold medalist Daiki Hashimoto of Japan poses in front of the Olympic rings. (Reuters)

Japan's all-around champion Daiki Hashimoto ended on a golden note to close off the Tokyo Olympics gymnastics program with a victory on the horizontal bar, but even the host nation's rising star could not steal the spotlight from American Simone Biles.

Japan's male gymnasts are used to hogging all the attention on home soil, but Tuesday at the Ariake Gymnastics Center was all about Biles and her last appearance in Tokyo after abruptly pulling out of last week's team event.

That was clear hours before the competition even started, with the world's media eyeing the 24-year-old's every move as she warmed up on the balance beam.

With Biles, considered by many as the greatest gymnast of all time and also lauded around the world for raising mental health awareness during these Olympics, Hashimoto's home-crowd appeal was no match.

As Biles collected a bronze medal on the beam and exited the competition floor, journalists and photographers followed en masse for her media briefing. International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach had also made the trip to watch her in action and shook hands with her once she had completed her routine.

Performing on the horizontal bar in a now near-empty arena, Hashimoto finished his high-flying display in breathtaking style to earn a winning score of 15.066.

After picking up two golds and a silver in Tokyo, many are now tipping him to follow in the golden footsteps of Kohei Uchimura, who ruled the all-around competition for two complete Olympic cycles, winning back-to-back golds at the 2012 London and 2016 Rio Games.

But Hashimoto, who turns 20 in four days, said he was not quite ready to step into those shoes.

"I don't think I am at the same level (as Uchimura) yet," he said. "But I will do my best, practice more and try to live up to his reputation and level."



Tottenham’s Bentancur Banned 7 Games, Fined $126,000 for Offensive Comment on South Koreans

Rodrigo Bentancur of Tottenham celebrates scoring the 1-2 goal during the English Premier League match between Tottenham Hotspur and Ipswich Town in London, Britain, 10 November 2024. (EPA)
Rodrigo Bentancur of Tottenham celebrates scoring the 1-2 goal during the English Premier League match between Tottenham Hotspur and Ipswich Town in London, Britain, 10 November 2024. (EPA)
TT

Tottenham’s Bentancur Banned 7 Games, Fined $126,000 for Offensive Comment on South Koreans

Rodrigo Bentancur of Tottenham celebrates scoring the 1-2 goal during the English Premier League match between Tottenham Hotspur and Ipswich Town in London, Britain, 10 November 2024. (EPA)
Rodrigo Bentancur of Tottenham celebrates scoring the 1-2 goal during the English Premier League match between Tottenham Hotspur and Ipswich Town in London, Britain, 10 November 2024. (EPA)

Uruguay midfielder Rodrigo Bentancur was banned for seven matches on Monday for making an offensive comment about South Koreans in relation to a remark about Tottenham teammate Son Heung-min.

The English Football Association said in a statement that an independent commission also imposed a £100,000 ($126,000) fine on the player.

Appearing on a Uruguayan television show in June, Bentancur was asked for a Tottenham player’s jersey and replied, “Sonny’s?” He added it could be Son’s cousin, too, because “more or less they are all the same.”

Bentancur apologized to Son on Instagram, saying it was a “very bad joke” and he would “never disrespect you or hurt you.”

He was charged by the English FA in September because he was alleged to have “acted in an improper manner and/or used abusive and/or insulting words and/or brought the game into disrepute.”

The FA said it constituted an aggravated breach because it included “reference to nationality and/or race and/or ethnic origin.”