Relatives of Beirut Blast Victims to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Won’t Be Silenced

Michel Merhej, the brother of Beirut blast victim Cesar. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Michel Merhej, the brother of Beirut blast victim Cesar. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Relatives of Beirut Blast Victims to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Won’t Be Silenced

Michel Merhej, the brother of Beirut blast victim Cesar. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Michel Merhej, the brother of Beirut blast victim Cesar. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

A year after the cataclysmic blast at Beirut Port, the relatives of the victims are still awaiting answers and demanding justice, all of which remain elusive as the corrupt ruling class continues to shirks responsibility.

Time stopped at the port at 6:08 pm on August 4, 2020.

It has been a year since the calamity. Visiting the scene is like rubbing salt in open wounds. No one can hide behind that moment in time forever.

The blast has become a dear friend to traumatized people. It accompanies them in their daily lives and keeps them up at night.

Even a year later, fears are still high that another explosion may happen given the ruling authority’s corruption and negligence that led to the blast in the first place.

People hang on to their phones in anticipation of the next explosion so that they can call for help. Ever since that fateful Tuesday afternoon, all we have left are our screams.

Under Beirut’s stifling heat and humidity, the damaged iconic silos loom over the devastation that is still very present at the port. Everything at the port is destroyed, desperate and lifeless. Even the weeds that have cropped up find no signs of life to grow.

Ibtisam, the wife of the victim Ghassan Hasrouty, stands with her back to the silos. Her white hair stands in sharp contrast to her black mourning clothes.

She told Asharq Al-Awsat that the wounds from the blast are still raw. “It was like yesterday”

Ghassan worked at the port for 38 years. He was a tireless employee, who learned hard work from his father, who too worked at hangars and silos.

“I feel as if he will come back. As if he will finish his shift and walk through the door,” said Ibtisam.

Coming to terms with loss is difficult.

It took 14 days for teams to locate her husband’s corpse.

“Everything changed after he died,” she added.

She still has faith that the relatives of the victims will emerge victorious against the political class’s lack of cooperation with the investigation.

“We will forge ahead with this case even though we don’t know which course the probe is taking,” she remarked.

“They are mocking us. It has been a year and no truth has been revealed. They are hiding behind each other. Exposing the corrupt system will signal its demise. That is what they fear,” she asserted.

“Who brought in the ammonium nitrate? Who unloaded them at the port? Who knew of its danger and did not act? They are all criminals,” she anguishly declared.

Her daughter Tatiana told Asharq Al-Awsat: “The blast will remain with us. We do not want to forget.”

“We are strong and we will not be silenced,” she vowed defiantly even as her state has let her down. “We will not surrender. I deserve a better life than this.”

Michel Merhej is the brother of Cesar Merhej, who died in the explosion. He was only 35 when he died. A father of two, he worked at the General Security.

His eldest child is 5 and has been receiving phycological treatment to cope with the loss.

“We are very angry,” Michel told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The relatives are pursuing justice even as officials hide behind their political immunities.

“We will achieve justice even if it comes at a great cost,” vowed Michel. “The blast was not a random occurrence, but a product of years of negligence and conspiring.”

Hiyam Qaadan is the mother of Ahmed, 30, who died from the blast when he was crushed by building rubble in the nearby Gemmayze district.

She rejects attempts to shut the case.

“You will be held accountable,” she vowed.

She refuses nothing less than setting up gallows at Hangar 12 where the ammonium nitrate was stored.

“I hope they bury their children the way we buried ours,” she told Asharq Al-Awsat.



Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich has told Asharq Al-Awsat that the US does not plan to withdraw its forces from Syria.

The US is committed to “the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with,” he said.

Here is the full text of the interview.

Question: Mr. Goldrich, thank you so much for taking the time to sit with us today. I know you are leaving your post soon. How do you assess the accomplishments and challenges remaining?

Answer: Thank you very much for the chance to talk with you today. I've been in this position for three years, and so at the end of three years, I can see that there's a lot that we accomplished and a lot that we have left to do. But at the beginning of a time I was here, we had just completed a review of our Syria policy, and we saw that we needed to focus on reducing suffering for the people in Syria. We needed to reduce violence. We needed to hold the regime accountable for things that are done and most importantly, from the US perspective, we needed to keep ISIS from reemerging as a threat to our country and to other countries. At the same time, we also realized that there wouldn't be a solution to the crisis until there was a political process under resolution 2254, so in each of these areas, we've seen both progress and challenges, but of course, on ISIS, we have prevented the reemergence of the threat from northeast Syria, and we've helped deal with people that needed to be repatriated out of the prisons, and we dealt with displaced people in al-Hol to reduce the numbers there. We helped provide for stabilization in those parts of Syria.

Question: I want to talk a little bit about the ISIS situation now that the US troops are still there, do you envision a timeline where they will be withdrawn? Because there were some reports in the press that there is a plan from the Biden administration to withdraw.

Answer: Yeah. So right now, our focus is on the mission that we have there to keep ISIS from reemerging. So I know there have been reports, but I want to make clear that we remain committed to the role that we play in that part of Syria, to the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with, and to the need to prevent that threat from reemerging.

Question: So you can assure people who are saying that you might withdraw, that you are remaining for the time being?

Answer: Yes, and that we remain committed to this mission which needs to continue to be pursued.

Question: You also mentioned the importance of humanitarian aid. The US has been leading on this. Are you satisfied with where you are today on the humanitarian front in Syria?

Answer: We remain committed to the role that we play to provide for humanitarian assistance in Syria. Of the money that was pledged in Brussels, we pledged $593 million just this past spring, and we overall, since the beginning of the conflict, have provided $18 billion both to help the Syrians who are inside of Syria and to help the refugees who are in surrounding countries. And so we remain committed to providing that assistance, and we remain keenly aware that 90% of Syrians are living in poverty right now, and that there's been suffering there. We're doing everything we can to reduce the suffering, but I think where we would really like to be is where there's a larger solution to the whole crisis, so Syrian people someday will be able to provide again for themselves and not need this assistance.

Question: And that's a perfect key to my next question. Solution in Syria. you are aware that the countries in the region are opening up to Assad again, and you also have the EU signaling overture to the Syrian regime and Assad. How do you deal with that?

Answer: For the United States, our policy continues to be that we will not normalize with the regime in Syria until there's been authentic and enduring progress on the goals of resolution 2254, until the human rights of the Syrian people are respected and until they have the civil and human rights that they deserve. We know other countries have engaged with the regime. When those engagements happen, we don't support them, but we remind the countries that are engaged that they should be using their engagements to push forward on the shared international goals under 2254, and that whatever it is that they're doing should be for the sake of improving the situation of the Syrian people.

Question: Let's say that all of the countries decided to talk to Assad, aren’t you worried that the US will be alienated in the process?

Answer: The US will remain true to our own principles and our own policies and our own laws, and the path for the regime in Syria to change its relationship with us is very clear, if they change the behaviors that led to the laws that we have and to the policies that we have, if those behaviors change and the circumstances inside of Syria change, then it's possible to have a different kind of relationship, but that's where it has to start.

Question: My last question to you before you leave, if you have to pick one thing that you need to do in Syria today, what is it that you would like to see happening today?

Answer: So there are a number of things, I think that will always be left and that there are things that we will try to do, to try to make them happen. We want to hold people accountable in Syria for things that have happened. So even today, we observed something called the International Day for victims of enforced disappearances, there are people that are missing, and we're trying to draw attention to the need to account for the missing people. So our step today was to sanction a number of officials who were responsible for enforced disappearances, but we also created something called the independent institution for missing persons, and that helps the families, in the non-political way, get information on what's happened. So I'd like to see some peace for the families of the missing people. I'd like to see the beginning of a political process, there hasn't been a meeting of the constitutional committee in two years, and I think that's because the regime has not been cooperating in political process steps. So we need to change that situation. And I would, of course, like it's important to see the continuation of the things that we were talking about, so keeping ISIS from reemerging and maintaining assistance as necessary in the humanitarian sphere. So all these things, some of them are ongoing, and some of them remain to be achieved. But the Syrian people deserve all aspects of our policy to be fulfilled and for them to be able to return to a normal life.