Israel’s Submarines Step Up Their Role in ‘Shadow War’ with Iran

Leviathan and a second Israeli navy submarine are seen during a naval maneuver in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of Haifa, northern Israel June 9, 2021. Picture taken June 9, 2021. REUTERS/Amir Cohen
Leviathan and a second Israeli navy submarine are seen during a naval maneuver in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of Haifa, northern Israel June 9, 2021. Picture taken June 9, 2021. REUTERS/Amir Cohen
TT

Israel’s Submarines Step Up Their Role in ‘Shadow War’ with Iran

Leviathan and a second Israeli navy submarine are seen during a naval maneuver in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of Haifa, northern Israel June 9, 2021. Picture taken June 9, 2021. REUTERS/Amir Cohen
Leviathan and a second Israeli navy submarine are seen during a naval maneuver in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of Haifa, northern Israel June 9, 2021. Picture taken June 9, 2021. REUTERS/Amir Cohen

A few may argue that the Israeli Air Force is the crown jewel of the Israeli army, but geopolitical realities and the ongoing shadow war with Iran reveal that the Israeli army has another decisive card to play with, its Navy.

For decades, Israel’s submarine fleet conducted primarily classic intelligence gathering missions. The subs could get in and out of far-away places without being noticed.

But of late, the Israeli army "realized it could do so much more", an Israel Navy official told the N12 news portal.

The details of what the Israeli submarines are up to remains classified, of course. What is known is that they are operating far from Israel’s shores, and earlier this month Iran charged that at least 14 of its ships in the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea had been attacked by Israeli forces.

If true, and Israel’s not officially taking responsibility, then submarines were almost certainly involved.

Gathering intelligence also remains a big part of the submarines’ role, but they can do more than just sit and listen. It was suggested in the N12 report that Israeli subs had been used to transport forces and individuals to and from far-away enemy territory.

“We are operating right under the enemy’s feet,” said the Navy, making the submarines not only a tactical asset, but a strategical one that gives Israel a degree of naval superiority over its regional foes.

This has not gone unnoticed by other branches of the military, and Navy officials told N12 that there is a growing demand for joint operations with the submarine fleet. So much so that they can’t keep up.

To remedy that situation, Israel will add a sixth submarine to its fleet in the coming years. The vessel is currently under construction in Germany, from which Israel purchases all of its submarines.

In 10-years' time, Israel is expected to replace at least half of its aging “Dolphin” class fleet with newer, more advanced and far larger submarines. The need to expand and modernize this secretive yet powerful force is becoming clearer by the day.

Regional tensions had reached a new peak after the July 29 attack on an Israeli-operated tanker off the coast of Oman, which Israel, the United States and Britain have accused Tehran of being behind.

According to analysis by The Telegraph at least 20 civilian ships have been attacked by mines, drones, and commandos in a rapidly spiraling “shadow war” between Iran and Israel.

Last year, Iranian destroyer Jamaran fired a missile that struck a logistics navy vessel called Konarak while conducting training exercises in the Strait of Hormuz, killing 19 sailors and wounding 15 others.

For his part, Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei had appointed a new navy commander as Iran-Israel tensions spike.

Khamenei appointed Adm. Shahram Irani as the new navy chief under the country’s army. He became the successor of Adm. Hossein Khanzadi, who has held the post since 2017.

In his decree, Khamenei urged Irani to improve the Navy. No reason was given for the replacement.



COP29 Nations are No Closer to a Goal on Cash for Climate Action

Participants and security staff stand outside the venue of the United Nations Climate Change Conference COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, 16 November 2024. EPA
Participants and security staff stand outside the venue of the United Nations Climate Change Conference COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, 16 November 2024. EPA
TT

COP29 Nations are No Closer to a Goal on Cash for Climate Action

Participants and security staff stand outside the venue of the United Nations Climate Change Conference COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, 16 November 2024. EPA
Participants and security staff stand outside the venue of the United Nations Climate Change Conference COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, 16 November 2024. EPA

Distractions were bigger than deals in the first week of the United Nations climate talks, leaving a lot to be done, especially on the main issue of money.
In week one, not a lot of progress was made on the issue of how much money rich countries should pay to developed ones to move away from dirty fuels and how to cope with rising seas and temperatures and pay for damage already caused by climate-driven extreme weather.
But more is expected when government ministers fly in for week two to handle the hard political deal-making at the negotiations — known as COP29 — in Baku, Azerbaijan.
Countries remain about a trillion dollars a year apart in the big number to be settled.
“All the developing countries look very united behind $1.3 trillion. That’s not a ceiling. That’s what they want. That’s what they think they need,” said Debbie Hillier, policy lead at Mercy Corps.
“The US and Canada are constantly talking about a floor of $100 billion.... So you've got $100 billion at one end and $1.3 trillion on the other end,” she said.
While poor countries have come up with a number for the total final package, the rich donor nations have assiduously avoided giving a total, choosing to pick a figure late in the bargaining game, Hillier said.
United Nations Climate Secretary Simon Stiell said, “negotiations on key issues need to be moving much faster.”
“What’s at stake here in Baku,” Stiell said, is “nothing less than the capacity to halve emissions this decade and protect lives and livelihoods from spiraling climate impacts.”
At the moment, the sides are far away, which is sort of normal for this stage.
“The technical details that are worked out by negotiators now have to give way to the bigger, harder number decisions made by climate and finance ministers to make more political decisions,” said Ani Dasgupta, president of World Resources Institute.
For her part, United Nations Environment Program Executive Director Inger Andersen said, “Member states have not moved and parties have not moved as expeditiously as they need to do.”
She added, “This is causing frustration. I understand that. So the answer is to push and push more and ensure that we land where we need to land.”
Andersen said it’s not smart to judge where countries will end up after just one week. Things change. It’s the nature of how negotiations are designed, experts said.
That’s how it usually goes.
Avinash Persaud, a special climate adviser at the Inter-American Development Bank said, “COP works on brinkmanship.”
He added that “COP works on the fear of us not reaching agreement in the end, which makes the process appear chaotic from the outside.”
Ministers will be consulting with their bosses half a world away and seven hours behind at the Group of 20 countries — the G20 — in Brazil from Monday.
Currently, eyes are on the COP president. Usually, the second week is when the COP president takes over and pushes sides together for a deal. Different negotiations' presidents have different styles. Last year's president used sharp elbows to get things done, upsetting some people.