IMF Says Will Decide 'Very Soon' on Whether Georgieva Keeps her Job

Kristalina Georgieva. Reuters file photo
Kristalina Georgieva. Reuters file photo
TT

IMF Says Will Decide 'Very Soon' on Whether Georgieva Keeps her Job

Kristalina Georgieva. Reuters file photo
Kristalina Georgieva. Reuters file photo

The International Monetary Fund said Friday it will decide "very soon" whether its embattled managing director Kristalina Georgieva keeps her job.

An investigation by a law firm has concluded that she manipulated data in favor of China while in a senior role at the World Bank.

The IMF Executive Board said after a meeting Friday that it has made "significant progress" in its assessment of the case but agreed "to request more clarifying details with a view to very soon concluding its consideration of the matter."

On Thursday Georgieva, 68, said she hoped for an "expeditious resolution" of the case.

The IMF Executive Board is reviewing last month's investigation by the law firm WilmerHale that found that during her time as World Bank CEO, Georgieva was among top officials who pressured staff into changing data to China's benefit in the 2018 edition of its closely watched Doing Business report.

Georgieva spoke to the IMF board this week.

She has repeatedly denied the report's conclusions, and on Thursday released a letter from her attorney to the board objecting to WilmerHale's findings, as well as her 12-page testimony to the 24 board members.

The law firm found that Georgieva along with her associate Simeon Djankov, a former Bulgarian finance minister who created the report, and Jim Yong Kim, then-president of the bank, pressured staff to change the calculation of China's ranking to avoid angering Beijing.

The push came while bank leadership was engaged in sensitive negotiations with Beijing over increasing the bank's lending capital.

The Executive Board could meet again Saturday, a source close to the matter told AFP on condition of anonymity.

This source added that Georgieva has won the support of France and other European countries.

The United States, a key member of the IMF, has not yet stated its position on this controversy, according to two sources with knowledge of the situation.

Time is of the essence because the IMF and the World Bank begin their fall meetings on Monday.



IMF to Lower Member Borrowing Costs… Egypt among Beneficiary Countries

IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva (Reuters)
IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva (Reuters)
TT

IMF to Lower Member Borrowing Costs… Egypt among Beneficiary Countries

IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva (Reuters)
IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva (Reuters)

The International Monetary Fund on Friday approved measures that will reduce its members' borrowing costs by about $1.2 billion annually, the fund's Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said.
According to research from Boston University's Global Development Policy Center, the five countries paying the highest surcharges are Ukraine, Egypt, Argentina, Ecuador and Pakistan.
“The approved measures will lower IMF borrowing costs for members by 36%, or about $1.2 billion annually,” Georgieva said in a statement.
“The expected number of countries subject to surcharges in fiscal year 2026 will fall from 20 to 13,” she added.
This year, the IMF decided to review its policy on charges and surcharges for the first time since 2016, as higher interest rates globally have pushed borrowing costs higher.
The fund charges regular interest, plus surcharges for loans above a certain threshold or duration, and commitment fees for precautionary arrangements.
“While substantially lowered, charges and surcharges remain an essential part of the IMF's cooperative lending and risk management framework, where all members contribute and all can benefit from support when needed,” Georgieva said.
The changes will take effect on November 1.
Argentina, currently the IMF's largest debtor, will save over $3 billion with the changes, according to the country’s Finance Secretary Pablo Quirno.
But Friday's announcement falls short of calls by academics, non-profit groups and other economists, who have argued for a full cancellation of IMF surcharges, which they say place extra burdens on borrowing countries at a time when they are in dire economic circumstances and counteract the impact of IMF lending.