‘Housewife’ Mummy Returns to Its Coffin after 170 Years

The “Unlucky Mummy”, from 945BC, displayed by the British Museum when it was visiting Taiwan’s National Palace Museum in Taipei in 2007. (AFP)
The “Unlucky Mummy”, from 945BC, displayed by the British Museum when it was visiting Taiwan’s National Palace Museum in Taipei in 2007. (AFP)
TT

‘Housewife’ Mummy Returns to Its Coffin after 170 Years

The “Unlucky Mummy”, from 945BC, displayed by the British Museum when it was visiting Taiwan’s National Palace Museum in Taipei in 2007. (AFP)
The “Unlucky Mummy”, from 945BC, displayed by the British Museum when it was visiting Taiwan’s National Palace Museum in Taipei in 2007. (AFP)

In 1815, an Egyptian mummy and three coffins were transferred from India to the British Museum. In 1968, curators at the British Museum scanned all the mummies of the Egyptian collection including the transferred mummy, which they thought it "belongs to a man." However, archeologists have long wondered what was a man's mummy doing with three coffins belonging to a woman known as the "Housewife." Until recently, the only provided explanation was that "the merchants, who sold the mummy and the three coffins to a British officer in the Mumbai Infantry, India, in 1846, collected these items from different sources to maximize their value – a common behavior among antiquities sellers in the 19th century."

However, a touring exhibition of six mummies organized by the British Museum reexamined this mummy, and managed to return it to its three coffins. While preparing for the exhibition, the curators found new evidence indicating that the mummy belongs to a woman. The findings will be announced in the upcoming issue of the Journal of Archeological Science. To confirm its identity, the scientists had to prove the mummy's connection to the three coffins. During the examination, they spotted a dry brown stain from the embalming residues in the bottom of the smallest coffin that contained the mummy. The linens wrapping the mummy revealed a similar stain on the lower part of the left shoulder matching the stain found in the coffin. Then, the researchers analyzed the residues to determine their composition, and whether it's the same in both stains.

A team of archeologists led by Marie Vandenbeusch from the Egypt and Sudan Department at the British Museum, said "the results show that the coffins belong to the controversial mummy," noting that the fluorescent embalming materials used in the genital organs area deceived the past CT scan which falsely indicated the mummy belongs to a man." The dual energy CT scan used in this study managed to define the gender of the mummy, and revealed that the woman died at the age 35-49, and suffered from a spinal injury."



NASA Downplays Role in Development of Titan Submersible that Imploded

(FILES) This undated image courtesy of OceanGate Expeditions, shows their Titan submersible beginning a descent. (Photo by Handout / OceanGate Expeditions / AFP)
(FILES) This undated image courtesy of OceanGate Expeditions, shows their Titan submersible beginning a descent. (Photo by Handout / OceanGate Expeditions / AFP)
TT

NASA Downplays Role in Development of Titan Submersible that Imploded

(FILES) This undated image courtesy of OceanGate Expeditions, shows their Titan submersible beginning a descent. (Photo by Handout / OceanGate Expeditions / AFP)
(FILES) This undated image courtesy of OceanGate Expeditions, shows their Titan submersible beginning a descent. (Photo by Handout / OceanGate Expeditions / AFP)

OceanGate co-founder Stockton Rush said the carbon fiber hull used in an experimental submersible that imploded en route to the wreckage of the Titanic was developed with help of NASA and aerospace manufacturers, but a NASA official testified Thursday that the space agency actually had little involvement at all.
OceanGate and NASA partnered in 2020 with NASA planning to play a role in building and testing the carbon fiber hull. But the COVID-19 pandemic prevented NASA from fulfilling its role, other than providing some consulting on an early mockup, not the ultimate carbon fiber hull that was used for people, said Justin Jackson, a materials engineer for NASA.
“We provided remote consultations throughout the build of their one third scale article, but we did not do any manufacturing or testing of their cylinders,” The Associated Press quoted Jackson as saying.
At one point, Jackson said NASA declined to allow its name to be invoked in a news release by OceanGate. “The language they were using was getting too close to us endorsing, so our folks had some heartburn with the endorsement level of it,” he told a Coast Guard panel that’s investigating the tragedy.
Rush was among the five people who died when the submersible imploded in June 2023. The design of the company's Titan submersible has been the source of scrutiny since the disaster.
The Coast Guard opened a public hearing earlier this month that is part of a high level investigation into the cause of the implosion. Some of the testimony has focused on the troubled nature of the company.
In addition to Jackson, Thursday's testimony was to include Mark Negley of Boeing Co.; John Winters of Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; and Lt. Cmdr. Jonathan Duffett of the Coast Guard Office of Commercial Vessel Compliance.
Earlier in the hearing, former OceanGate operations director David Lochridge said he frequently clashed with Rush and felt the company was committed only to making money. “The whole idea behind the company was to make money,” Lochridge testified. “There was very little in the way of science.”
Lochridge and other previous witnesses painted a picture of a company that was impatient to get its unconventionally designed craft into the water. The accident set off a worldwide debate about the future of private undersea exploration.
The hearing is expected to run through Friday and include more witnesses.
The co-founder of the company told the Coast Guard panel Monday that he hoped a silver lining of the disaster is that it will inspire a renewed interest in exploration, including the deepest waters of the world’s oceans. Businessman Guillermo Sohnlein, who helped found OceanGate with Rush, ultimately left the company before the Titan disaster.
“This can’t be the end of deep ocean exploration. This can’t be the end of deep-diving submersibles and I don’t believe that it will be,” Sohnlein said.
Coast Guard officials noted at the start of the hearing that the submersible had not been independently reviewed, as is standard practice. That and Titan’s unusual design subjected it to scrutiny in the undersea exploration community.
OceanGate, based in Washington state, suspended its operations after the implosion. The company has no full-time employees currently, but has been represented by an attorney during the hearing.
During the submersible’s final dive on June 18, 2023, the crew lost contact after an exchange of texts about Titan’s depth and weight as it descended. The support ship Polar Prince then sent repeated messages asking if Titan could still see the ship on its onboard display.
One of the last messages from Titan’s crew to Polar Prince before the submersible imploded stated, “all good here,” according to a visual re-creation presented earlier in the hearing.
When the submersible was reported overdue, rescuers rushed ships, planes and other equipment to an area about 435 miles (700 kilometers) south of St. John’s, Newfoundland. Wreckage of the Titan was subsequently found on the ocean floor about 330 yards (300 meters) off the bow of the Titanic, Coast Guard officials said. No one on board survived.
OceanGate said it has been fully cooperating with the Coast Guard and NTSB investigations since they began. Titan had been making voyages to the Titanic wreckage site going back to 2021.