Netanyahu Tried to Back Out of Abraham Accords over UAE’s Insistence on Freezing Annexation

Trump and Netanyahu with the foreign ministers of the UAE and Bahrain during the signing of the Abraham Accords at the White House in September 2020. EPA
Trump and Netanyahu with the foreign ministers of the UAE and Bahrain during the signing of the Abraham Accords at the White House in September 2020. EPA
TT

Netanyahu Tried to Back Out of Abraham Accords over UAE’s Insistence on Freezing Annexation

Trump and Netanyahu with the foreign ministers of the UAE and Bahrain during the signing of the Abraham Accords at the White House in September 2020. EPA
Trump and Netanyahu with the foreign ministers of the UAE and Bahrain during the signing of the Abraham Accords at the White House in September 2020. EPA

Israeli journalist Barak Ravid, author of the book, “Trump’s Peace: The Abraham Accords and the Reshaping of the Middle East,” revealed that former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, tried to withdraw from a historic agreement to normalize relations with the UAE, one day before former US President Donald Trump announced it.

The reason for his hesitation was the Emirati insistence on freezing the plan to annex areas of the West Bank to Israel. Thus, he clashed with the majority of the president’s staff, and dramatic contacts took place between the White House and Netanyahu’s office, until he was forced to move forward with the Abraham Accords.

Ravid said that the contacts between the two parties reached the level of tension and threat. The White House envoy for the peace process, Avi Berkowitz, warned Netanyahu, saying: “You’re going to take your greatest friend in the world, and make him an enemy. I can’t tell you what to do but I strongly advise you against it.”

Ravid stressed that the reason for Netanyahu’s retreat from the agreement was due to the results of opinion polls that indicated that he would lose the upcoming elections.

On the other hand, the UAE was exerting no less intense pressure, closely linking the annexation with the cancellation of the normalization agreement. White House officials, who were familiar with the developments, wondered how Netanyahu could put partisan political considerations over such a historical event.

At the time, Jordan announced that implementing the annexation plan would undermine the peace agreement with Israel. In parallel, the UAE ambassador to Washington, Yousef Al-Otaiba, published his famous article on the front page of Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, in which he clearly asserted that Israel cannot implement the annexation while at the same time normalizing relations with Arab countries. This article came as a slap to Netanyahu, who was declaring that the Arab world did not oppose the annexation plan.

Meanwhile, US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman was pushing hard in favor of Netanyahu’s annexation plan, Ravid said. As Netanyahu and Gantz disagreed on the issue, Friedman even tried to mediate between them to move it forward.

Ravid recounted that on June 24, a week before Netanyahu announced the annexation, Friedman met with Trump.

At the end of the meeting, Trump said that he had no problem with pushing the annexation plan forward, and demanded that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, make the decision, but added: “But if anything bad happens, it’s on all your heads.”

It was agreed that Friedman and White House envoy Avi Berkowitz would travel to Israel in order to meet Netanyahu and Gantz, and try to reach understandings about an agreed-upon annexation plan, or remove the issue from the agenda until after the US elections.

Kushner laid some groundwork for the trip by telling Netanyahu annexation must not happen without a green light from the White House or without any concessions to the Palestinians. “I told Netanyahu the goal was to implement Trump’s plan, not unilateral annexation," Kushner told Ravid.

According to the book, Netanyahu threatened to advance the annexation step in the West Bank without a green light from the White House. In another meeting two days later, Netanyahu told Friedman and Berkowitz that he wanted to annex 13 percent of the West Bank, including settlements, and refused to grant anything to the Palestinians.

On July 1, Berkowitz returned to Washington and received a call from Otaiba, who presented the possibility that Israel would not implement annexation in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel.

Negotiations began several days later, during which Netanyahu asked to change the terms of the deal, and said that he would stop the annexation plan, only, if three Arab countries agreed to normalize relations with Israel, not just the UAE.



Sudanese Stakeholders Hold Roundtable Talks in Geneva

A previous meeting of the coordination of Tagadum with the officials of the African Mechanism in Addis Ababa. (Tagadum on Facebook)
A previous meeting of the coordination of Tagadum with the officials of the African Mechanism in Addis Ababa. (Tagadum on Facebook)
TT

Sudanese Stakeholders Hold Roundtable Talks in Geneva

A previous meeting of the coordination of Tagadum with the officials of the African Mechanism in Addis Ababa. (Tagadum on Facebook)
A previous meeting of the coordination of Tagadum with the officials of the African Mechanism in Addis Ababa. (Tagadum on Facebook)

Geneva has hosted a third “roundtable” of meetings involving Sudanese political and civil groups aimed at bridging the gap between the country’s warring parties. These talks, coordinated by the French organization Promediation, follow similar meetings held previously in Cairo and Geneva. The primary goals are to negotiate a ceasefire and facilitate humanitarian aid to civilians.

The two-day meetings, which began on Monday, include representatives from the Coordination of Democratic Civil Forces (Tagadum), the pro-army Democratic Bloc coalition, and armed movements aligned with the bloc. However, some groups have announced their boycott of the meetings.

The Democratic Bloc has shown conflicting stances on attending the Geneva talks. Mohammed Zakaria, spokesperson for the bloc and a member of the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), announced his group’s decision not to participate.

Omar Khalafallah, a leader in the Democratic Unionist Party and another bloc spokesperson, refuted Zakaria’s statement, insisting that the bloc would attend the meetings to promote a national vision.

A source within the Democratic Bloc told Asharq Al-Awsat that the meetings revealed significant internal divisions in the coalition. The JEM, led by current Finance Minister Jibril Ibrahim, appears to be charting its own course, which the source described as a form of defection.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Sharif Mohammed Osman, a leader in Tagadum and the political secretary of the Sudanese Congress Party, explained that the meetings seek to achieve consensus on ending the war through negotiated solutions, starting with a humanitarian truce to ensure aid delivery and the opening of safe corridors.

These measures are considered preliminary steps toward a ceasefire and a peaceful resolution to the conflict, he underlined.

A wide array of civilian leaders are participating in the talks, including key figures from Tagadum, such as Sudanese Congress Party leader Omar Al-Dukair, Federal Gathering Party leader Babiker Faisal, and head of the Sudan Liberation Movement – Transitional Council Al-Hadi Idris.

Osman expressed optimism that the participants would issue a unified final statement addressing the peaceful resolution of the war and agreeing on a humanitarian truce to facilitate aid delivery.

In October, Cairo hosted a similar meeting, which resulted in a final statement signed by the participating groups, except for the Sudan Liberation Movement – Minni Minnawi faction and the JEM – Jibril Ibrahim faction, which refused to endorse the Cairo declaration despite attending the discussions.

Promediation, a French organization supported by the French and Swiss foreign ministries, has played a consistent role in Sudanese affairs. Since June 2022, it has organized roundtable discussions, initially focusing on negotiations between Darfuri armed movements before expanding its scope to include Sudanese political and civil forces in the wake of the war.