Washington Restricts ‘Entities’ Helping Iran ‘Militarily’

 A fence surrounds the US Department of Commerce in Washington (Reuters)
A fence surrounds the US Department of Commerce in Washington (Reuters)
TT

Washington Restricts ‘Entities’ Helping Iran ‘Militarily’

 A fence surrounds the US Department of Commerce in Washington (Reuters)
A fence surrounds the US Department of Commerce in Washington (Reuters)

The US Department of Commerce on Thursday blacklisted several trade companies for aiding Iran’s military programs and helping Tehran circumvent US sanctions.

A statement issued by the Commerce Department said that it was acting against entities operating in Georgia, Malaysia, and Turkey for diverting or attempting to divert US items to Iran’s military programs, according to Reuters.

The move against collaborators with Iran’s military programs coincided with the imposition of export restrictions on many Chinese companies for their role in suppressing the Uyghurs.

Meanwhile, former US officials and diplomats have called on the Biden administration to seriously consider military options to pressure Iran away from getting its hands on nuclear weapons, curb its military drone program and deter its destabilizing activities in the region.

Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman, a former US Senator, demanded that the Biden administration exists the Vienna negotiations, voicing his strong belief that it presents the best opportunity to counteract the impressions that we’re left with the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Speaking at an event organized by the National Council of Resistance of Iran, Lieberman noted that the withdrawal from Afghanistan in the “chaotic” manner that it was done had sent a message to enemies, like China and others, that US might be dwindling.

Moreover, Lieberman accused Iran of weakening Lebanon and threatening regional stability and that standing against these actions is “consistent with the priority the US gives to democracy and human rights.”

He pointed to the Iranian regime’s continued targeting of minorities and terrorizing of people.

“How can you trust a regime this?” said Lieberman, wondering how the US can pursue negotiations with Iran in Vienna with all the atrocities its regime has committed.

“We have to change course toward Iran not only to limit its threats but also to use this opportunity to tell our friends and enemies that we’re willing to be tough,” said Lieberman.

“It’s time to stop this game they’re playing with us.”

Lieberman called for being prepared to have all other options on the table, including, if necessary, joining or supporting military activities by allies.

For his part, Ambassador Robert Joseph, former Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, considered that the Biden administration seems to be paying a high price for a bad agreement.

He pointed out that millions of dollars returning to Tehran was a grave mistake and that Iran’s drone program was a reason for significant concern.

He accused Iran of using the negotiations in Vienna to buy time and continue its destruction.

“The correct decision, both politically and morally, is to support the people of Iran in their struggle for freedom and democracy,” said Joseph.

David Shedd, former Acting Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, noted that although talking with Iran was not something he opposes, the most crucial matter remains that the regime changes from within.



China Anchors ‘Monster Ship’ in South China Sea, Philippine Coast Guard Says

An aerial view shows the BRP Sierra Madre on the contested Second Thomas Shoal, locally known as Ayungin, in the South China Sea, March 9, 2023. (Reuters)
An aerial view shows the BRP Sierra Madre on the contested Second Thomas Shoal, locally known as Ayungin, in the South China Sea, March 9, 2023. (Reuters)
TT

China Anchors ‘Monster Ship’ in South China Sea, Philippine Coast Guard Says

An aerial view shows the BRP Sierra Madre on the contested Second Thomas Shoal, locally known as Ayungin, in the South China Sea, March 9, 2023. (Reuters)
An aerial view shows the BRP Sierra Madre on the contested Second Thomas Shoal, locally known as Ayungin, in the South China Sea, March 9, 2023. (Reuters)

The Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) said on Saturday that China's largest coastguard vessel has anchored in Manila's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the South China Sea, and is meant to intimidate its smaller Asian neighbor.

The China coastguard's 165-meter "monster ship" entered Manila's 200-nautical mile EEZ on July 2, spokesperson for the PCG Jay Tarriela told a news forum.

The PCG warned the Chinese vessel it was in the Philippine's EEZ and asked about their intentions, he said.

"It's an intimidation on the part of the China Coast Guard," Tarriela said. "We're not going to pull out and we're not going to be intimidated."

China's embassy in Manila and the Chinese foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China's coast guard has no publicly available contact information.

The Chinese ship, which has also deployed a small boat, was anchored 800 yards away from the PCG's vessel, Tarriela said.

In May, the PCG deployed a ship to the Sabina shoal to deter small-scale reclamation by China, which denied the claim. China has carried out extensive land reclamation on some islands in the South China Sea, building air force and other military facilities, causing concern in Washington and around the region.

China claims most of the South China Sea, a key conduit for $3 trillion of annual ship-borne trade, as its own territory. Beijing rejects the 2016 ruling by The Hague-based Permanent Court of Arbitration which said its expansive maritime claims had no legal basis.

Following a high-level dialogue, the Philippines and China agreed on Tuesday for the need to "restore trust" and "rebuild confidence" to better manage maritime disputes.

The Philippines has turned down offers from the United States, its treaty ally, to assist operations in the South China Sea, despite a flare-up with China over routing resupply missions to Filipino troops on a contested shoal.