Sadr Eyes Taking Down Iranian Financial Cartel Operating in Iraq

Moqtada al-Sadr, Asharq Al-Awsat
Moqtada al-Sadr, Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Sadr Eyes Taking Down Iranian Financial Cartel Operating in Iraq

Moqtada al-Sadr, Asharq Al-Awsat
Moqtada al-Sadr, Asharq Al-Awsat

In Baghdad, advertisement is rife for private banks safeguarded by concrete walls and security detail. But it is hard to find a single customer using these banks for any financial transactions. These newly formed institutions hide part of a complex financial “cartel” for smuggling and money laundering.

On February 17, Moqtada al-Sadr, an influential Shia scholar who leads the Sadrist Movement in Iraq, called for holding shady banks accountable for their involvement in currency smuggling and bill fraud.

It is difficult to be sure whether Sadr’s demands will be sufficient for dismantling one of the largest cohesive groups for financial manipulation in the region, especially since political parties and armed factions back it.

Nevertheless, Sadr’s move was a reminder to opponents that he does not receive political blows from opponents of the majority coalition without a response.

Little information is available about the nature of this cartel, who’s backing it and how it operates to achieve profits estimated at millions of dollars from smuggling and counterfeiting operations.

However, reliable sources say that this type of operation has escalated and taken an organized form after Washington imposed sanctions on Iran.

The lack of documented information against this cartel can be traced to fears of being assassinated for revealing the group’s secrets.

But scattered pieces of information, which were leaked over the past four years, show an initial picture of how this cartel operates and its association with local political and armed groups and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.

In the past years, Iraqi militias have established fake banks and companies that buy dollars from the official currency market with forged invoices and correspondences.

As sources of information intersect, it is estimated that more than $500 million are drained daily from the Iraqi market by these illicit financial operations.

These funds are linked to bank accounts established after the US sanctions in the capitals of Syria, Lebanon and Tehran, a senior official who requested anonymity told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Former Iraqi lawmakers note that the funds not only helped Iran ease the impact of US sanctions, but also financed strife in the region’s countries. They funded internal conflicts that erupted in the past five years.

The Iraqi government’s recent recommendation for international bodies to reduce the value of the Iraqi dinar has upset the Iranians because it will have to spend more local currency and hold different import transactions to obtain dollars from Iraq.



Lebanon War... Why is it Difficult for Netanyahu and Nasrallah to Back Down?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah. AFP/Reuters
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah. AFP/Reuters
TT

Lebanon War... Why is it Difficult for Netanyahu and Nasrallah to Back Down?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah. AFP/Reuters
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah. AFP/Reuters

Informed sources in Beirut told Asharq Al-Awsat that any diplomatic efforts to stop the ongoing war between Israel and Lebanon would face the obstacle of the main parties to the conflict — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah — finding it difficult to back down.

Why is Netanyahu refusing to back down?

The sources noted that the war in Lebanon has achieved for Netanyahu what he could not accomplish in Gaza. They summarized it as follows:

- Netanyahu framed the war with a unifying message that has gained consensus across the Israeli political spectrum: the return of the northern residents who were displaced after Hezbollah launched cross-border attacks following the Oct. 7 attacks in Gaza. This means that the Israeli military operations enjoy broad political and public backing.

- Netanyahu began the war by striking Hezbollah’s communication networks, inflicting unprecedented losses on the group and sidelining around 1,500 of its members from the battlefield.

- He dealt a near-fatal blow to the leadership of the Radwan Forces, the elite military wing of Hezbollah, managing to eliminate prominent figures, some of whom were listed as US targets due to attacks that occurred in Beirut four decades ago.

- Netanyahu can claim that Hezbollah initiated the war and that Israel’s only demand is the return of northern residents and ensuring their safety.

- Thus, it seems difficult for Netanyahu to back down from the demand of returning the displaced, which practically means disengaging the Lebanese front from the Gaza front.

Why is Nasrallah refusing to back down?

The sources pointed to the following reasons:

- It is hard for Nasrallah to accept a setback in a war that he initiated.

- He also finds it difficult to accept disengagement after Hezbollah has suffered unprecedented losses, unlike anything it faced in its previous confrontations with Israel, including the 2006 war.

- Accepting a setback would signal that Iran is not willing to take concrete steps to confront Israel.

- If Hezbollah agrees to disengage from Gaza without a ceasefire there, many would view the cross-border attacks launched by the party in support of the Palestinian enclave as a reckless gamble.

- A setback for Hezbollah would demoralize the Axis of Resistance and have a ripple effect on Gaza itself.

- Agreeing to a ceasefire without securing even "limited gains" would reinforce the perception that Nasrallah launched a war that most Lebanese reject, and that Hezbollah bears responsibility for the resulting losses.