US Senators Urge Against Waiving Caesar Sanctions in Northern Syria

A US military vehicle, part of a convoy arriving from northern Iraq, drives past an oil pump jack in the countryside of Syria’s northeastern city of Qamishli on October 26, 2019. (AFP)
A US military vehicle, part of a convoy arriving from northern Iraq, drives past an oil pump jack in the countryside of Syria’s northeastern city of Qamishli on October 26, 2019. (AFP)
TT

US Senators Urge Against Waiving Caesar Sanctions in Northern Syria

A US military vehicle, part of a convoy arriving from northern Iraq, drives past an oil pump jack in the countryside of Syria’s northeastern city of Qamishli on October 26, 2019. (AFP)
A US military vehicle, part of a convoy arriving from northern Iraq, drives past an oil pump jack in the countryside of Syria’s northeastern city of Qamishli on October 26, 2019. (AFP)

Republican Senators at Congress have warned Joe Biden's administration against lifting any sanctions against the Syrian regime, even though no official moves on the ground have been taken to that end.

The legislative and executive authorities in the US have frequently tussled over the Syria, going back to the term of President Barak Obama. The debates eventually led to the unanimous adoption of the Caesar Act that has outlined American policy over Syria.

Media leaks have, however, revealed that the Biden administration is seeking to waive the Caesar Act in northern Syria under the pretext of improving humanitarian and economic conditions there.

The concern prompted three Republican senators, Joe Wilson, Claudia Tenny and Pat Fallon, to issue a letter to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, asking him to clarify the claims.

They warned against easing sanctions against the regime and regions under its control. "The Caesar Act already provides exemptions for humanitarian relief, in addition to those which already exist in current law," read the letter.

"It is troubling that the administration has reportedly reached a decision to issue a broad geographical waiver while having offered no explanation to Congress for why the existing waiver and license structure is insufficient to achieve US objectives in northern Syria," it continued.

"Why are these waivers necessary when humanitarian assistance is already exempted under the Caesar Act and other laws and the existing authorities include a licensure mechanism?"

"How will the administration guarantee that the Assad regime or its affiliates and front companies will not be able to generate revenues of gain access to foreign currency through these waivers?"

The State Department denied that the administration was seeking to weaken sanctions on the Assad regime and in areas under its control.

A Department spokesperson told Asharq Al-Awsat that the administration will stress going forward in the political process as stipulated in United Nations Security Council resolution 2254.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, they said the administration opposes any reconstruction efforts led by the regime. It will not back down on its "firm" stance over this issue until progress is achieved in the political process.

They stressed that no sanctions will be lifted off Assad and his regime and no waivers will be granted to them.

The spokesperson did not respond to the media leaks or the senators concern that the regime may exploit the lifting of sanctions on regions held by the Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces in northeastern Syria and the Turkish-backed opposition in the northwest.

They instead said the administration supports providing humanitarian aid to Syria through all means, including the cross-border mechanism that was approved by the Security Council. Discussions will continue with all members of the Council over this issue. The mechanism is a guarantee for delivering life-saving aid to Syrians.

Former Syrian diplomat Bassam Barabandi described as "dangerous" the proposal that the administration may lift sanctions.

He explained that some officials in the American administration, who are tasked with Middle East affairs, believe that there can be no solution to wars in countries, such as Yemen and Syria, except in recognizing the de facto powers, even if some regions are run by a terrorist authority.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he said the proposal that is now being weighed focuses on the possibility of finding common economic factors between the warring parties in Syria so that they could eventually reach a political solution that takes into account the de facto forces and their interests, even if they are illegal.

This effectively means the economic division of Syria and eventually its political and geographic division, he noted.

This decision coincides with western negotiations with Iran over its nuclear deal that are reaching a "happy ending" and the prices that have to be paid by each party as part of the agreement.

The Monitor was the first to report on the Biden administration's possible sanctions waivers. The Office of Foreign Assets Control waiver on all sanctions for the areas outside the Syrian regime’s control will not cover oil and gas, it said citing sources.



Lebanon’s Jumblatt Visits Syria, Hoping for a Post-Assad Reset in Troubled Relations

Walid Jumblatt (C), the Druze former leader of Lebanon's Progressive Socialist Party (PSP), and his son and current party head Taymur Jumblatt (C-L) meet with Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa (R) and interim prime minister Mohammad al-Bashir (L) during a visit to Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
Walid Jumblatt (C), the Druze former leader of Lebanon's Progressive Socialist Party (PSP), and his son and current party head Taymur Jumblatt (C-L) meet with Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa (R) and interim prime minister Mohammad al-Bashir (L) during a visit to Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
TT

Lebanon’s Jumblatt Visits Syria, Hoping for a Post-Assad Reset in Troubled Relations

Walid Jumblatt (C), the Druze former leader of Lebanon's Progressive Socialist Party (PSP), and his son and current party head Taymur Jumblatt (C-L) meet with Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa (R) and interim prime minister Mohammad al-Bashir (L) during a visit to Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
Walid Jumblatt (C), the Druze former leader of Lebanon's Progressive Socialist Party (PSP), and his son and current party head Taymur Jumblatt (C-L) meet with Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa (R) and interim prime minister Mohammad al-Bashir (L) during a visit to Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)

Former head of Lebanon’s Progressive Socialist Party (PSP), Druze leader Walid Jumblatt held talks on Sunday with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham leader Ahmed al-Sharaa, whose group led the overthrow of Syria's President Bashar Assad, with both expressing hope for a new era in relations between their countries.

Jumblatt was a longtime critic of Syria's involvement in Lebanon and blamed Assad's father, former President Hafez Assad, for the assassination of his own father decades ago. He is the most prominent Lebanese politician to visit Syria since the Assad family's 54-year rule came to an end.

“We salute the Syrian people for their great victories and we salute you for your battle that you waged to get rid of oppression and tyranny that lasted over 50 years,” said Jumblatt.

He expressed hope that Lebanese-Syrian relations “will return to normal.”

Jumblatt's father, Kamal, was killed in 1977 in an ambush near a Syrian roadblock during Syria's military intervention in Lebanon's civil war. The younger Jumblatt was a critic of the Assads, though he briefly allied with them at one point to gain influence in Lebanon's ever-shifting political alignments.

“Syria was a source of concern and disturbance, and its interference in Lebanese affairs was negative,” al-Sharaa said, referring to the Assad government. “Syria will no longer be a case of negative interference in Lebanon," he said, pledging that it would respect Lebanese sovereignty.

Al-Sharaa also repeated longstanding allegations that Assad's government was behind the 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, which was followed by other killings of prominent Lebanese critics of Assad.

Last year, the United Nations closed an international tribunal investigating the assassination after it convicted three members of Lebanon's Hezbollah — an ally of Assad — in absentia. Hezbollah denied involvement in the massive Feb. 14, 2005 bombing, which killed Hariri and 21 others.

“We hope that all those who committed crimes against the Lebanese will be held accountable, and that fair trials will be held for those who committed crimes against the Syrian people,” Jumblatt said.