Sudan Islamists Struggle to Choose Turabi's Successor

Eid el-Fitr prayers in Khartoum (File photo: AFP)
Eid el-Fitr prayers in Khartoum (File photo: AFP)
TT

Sudan Islamists Struggle to Choose Turabi's Successor

Eid el-Fitr prayers in Khartoum (File photo: AFP)
Eid el-Fitr prayers in Khartoum (File photo: AFP)

Sudan's Islamist parties, the National Congress and the Popular Congress parties, will soon begin a new chapter in their conflict. The new development comes two weeks after Islamist parties, except the Popular Congress, signed a new political charter to establish the "Broad Islamic Current."

The National Congress Party (NCP) is led by former President Omar al-Bashir, while the Popular Congress Party (PCP) is chaired by Ali al-Hajj, who is in prison.

The two parties have a long history of rivalry and competition after Bashir overthrew the "godfather" of the Islamist movement in Sudan, Hassan al-Turabi, in 1999.

The designated Sec-Gen of the Popular Congress Party, Al-Amin Abdel Razek, criticized at a meeting a top National Congress leader, whom he did not name. However, the audience chanted the name of Ali Karti, who has been living outside Sudan since December 2018.

Abdel Razek accused the NCP official of plotting to overthrow Ali al-Hajj from the Popular Congress Party and hinted that he led to his imprisonment in Kober Central Prison in Khartoum.

Hajj is on trial for participating in the planning and implementation of the June 30, 1989 coup, along with Bashir and dozens of military and civilian leaders who participated in planning to seize power that year.

Abdel Razek pointed out that NCP leaders are toying with the country's fate, and they make political decisions.

He asserted that the PCP would not be part of any military rule, calling for political pluralism and peaceful power transfer.

NCP official Amin Hassan Omar said that the broad Islamist trend is a consensus between various Islamist forces which have agreed on a "joint work program."

Omar declared that his party was open to anyone who wished to work with others in the Islamist movement, adding that it is continuously developing.

He indicated that the general idea is to reach out to all the Islamists and agree with them, adding that the party will work differently with Sufi orders and the right-wing currents.

A source told Asharq Al-Awsat about a fundamental conflict between Islamist currents, pointing out that NCP's Karti wants to control the Broad Islamic Current.

The source, who preferred not to be named, said a group affiliated with NCP's Hajj turned against him, which he viewed as treason.

The source pointed out that the conflict is old but resurfaced with the emergence of the Broad Islamic Current, adding that NCP and PCP officials are competing for its leadership.

Deputy head of the Reform Now Movement Hassan Rizk said that recent developments could not be referred to as a "struggle" between the NCP and the PCP.

Rizk explains that the disagreements are between those who want to unite Islamist trends and all the components of the Islamist movement and those who reject it.

He asserted that the Islamist movement must unite because "the enemy does not differentiate between NCP or PCP."

Rizk added that the Islamists wanted to unite the Islamist trend, except for the PCP, which was part of NCP and participated in all stages of the establishment of the new Islamist body.



Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
TT

Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)

Baghdad has been preoccupied this week with serious possibilities that Israel may expand its war on Gaza and Lebanon by striking several targets in Iraq in retaliation to attacks by Iran-backed armed factions.

Concern has been high that Israel may attack government buildings, oil fields and strategic locations, not just the positions of the armed factions that have previously launched attacks against Israel, said sources close to the pro-Iran ruling Coordination Framework.

Media sources have spoken of government speculation that Iraq could come under “300 Israeli attacks”.

The fears in Iraq have been compounded by an Israeli complaint to the United Nations Security Council against seven armed factions and holding Baghdad responsible for the attacks they have carried out against it.

This prompted the government, through the foreign ministry, to send an official letter to the Security Council, UN Secretary-General, Arab League and Organization of Islamic Cooperation in response to the Israeli threats.

The ministry said on Saturday that Iraq is “the cornerstone of stability in the region and world and it is one of the countries that are most committed to the UN Charter.”

“The Zionist entity’s letter to the Security Council is part of a systematic policy aimed at creating claims and excuses in an attempt to expand the conflict in the region.”

It said Iraq has turned to the Security Council out of Iraq’s keenness on the international body carrying out its duty in maintaining international peace and security and the need to rein in the “Zionist aggression in Gaza and Lebanon.”

Moreover, it stressed that Iraq has been keen on exercising restraint when it comes to the use of its airspace to attack a neighboring country.

Israel has used Iraqi airspace to launch attacks against Iran in October.

Iraq underscored the importance of the international community stepping in to “stop this hostile behavior that is a flagrant violation of international law.”

It called for international efforts to stop the Israeli escalation in the region and ensure that international laws and treaties are respected to consolidate security and stability.

Meanwhile, a source close to the Coordination Framework said the main Shiite parties are taking the Israeli threats “very seriously”, urging Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's government to take “all the necessary measures to avert a potential Israeli strike.”

All leaders of armed factions, as well as Shiite leaders, have taken up alternative locations and are moving under great secrecy, confirming that they have changed the majority of their military positions, said the source.

It also dismissed claims that Israeli jets have overflown Iraq, saying nothing has been confirmed, but not ruling out the possibility, especially since US forces have control over Iraqi skies and Iraq is helpless against stopping these violations.

Iraq had submitted a formal complaint to the UN and Security Council over Israel’s use and violation of its airspace to attack Iran.

Analyst and former diplomat Ghazi Faisal said the pro-Iran armed factions have been gathering their forces in the Sinjar province, which is strategic for Iran’s arms deliveries and logistic support to Syria where attacks can be carried out against American forces and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

Sinjar is one of the most important strategic bases for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, he added.

Furthermore, he noted that the armed factions insist on continuing the war against Israel, rejecting government calls for calm and neutrality.

The government’s statements are aimed at delivering a message that it “is not directly responsible for the strategy of these factions,” which follow Iran’s policies.

Iraq has repeatedly said that it refuses for its territory to be used to attack another country, but some observers believe that it may allow Iran to do so should Israel strike.