عربي English Türkçe اردو فارسى
Logo
Latest News
Arab World

Freedom and Change Seeks New Opposition Alliance in Sudan

Protesters demanding civilian rule take to the streets of Khartoum. (AFP)
Protesters demanding civilian rule take to the streets of Khartoum. (AFP)
TT
20
TT

Freedom and Change Seeks New Opposition Alliance in Sudan

Protesters demanding civilian rule take to the streets of Khartoum. (AFP)
Protesters demanding civilian rule take to the streets of Khartoum. (AFP)

Sudan's Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) announced the formation of a new alliance called the "United Civil Front," which unites all forces supporting the December 2018 revolution that toppled ousted President Omar al-Bashir.

The Forces called for direct negotiations with the military to restore the civil democratic transition and form a united national army.

The leader of FFC and former Minister of Cabinet Affairs Khaled Omar Youssef said the Freedom and Change are working to establish a new alliance that unites civilians.

Youssef explained that the alliance would comprise political parties, specialists, resistance committees, and civil society to coordinate the resistance against the current military rule.

The former minister called for a radical change to end what he described as a "monocultural state," adding that the aim is to form a state that represents the various Sudanese components, ends totalitarianism, and establishes a "democratic culture."

Youssef asserted that the democratic transition can only happen gradually, noting that "we seek a radical change within a democratic framework, as opposed to those who call for a radical change within a totalitarian framework."

The official explained that democratic change could not happen without military reform and without rearranging the relationship between civilians and the military.

He indicated that the military institution's role should be limited to protecting the homeland and citizens and guarding the constitution. It should not be involved in politics and must execute constitutionally mandated tasks.

Youssef also warned against dissolving the Rapid Support Forces and armed movements, calling for merging them into the military.

"The demands for dissolving the Rapid Support Forces and the armed movements are illogical because there are about 200,000 fighters. If those forces are dissolved, where will these fighters go?" asked Youssef, warning that this will lead to the formation of about 200 militias.

Moreover, the senior official criticized the "hostility between civilians and the military," noting that the military leaders must realize that the democratic civil transition is in their interest by rebuilding, arming, and training the army to focus on its duties.

Youssef clarified that the FFC does not want to return to the partnership with the military, saying that the October 25 coup ended the chance of forming alliances. Still, it is essential to discuss civil-military relations with the army.

He criticized the opponents of dialogue, saying this "unites the military establishment against the democratic transition."

Furthermore, he added that protests and demonstrations alone are not enough to end the coup, suggesting that other peaceful activities, including strikes, disobedience, and others, must be used to expand the resistance.

Most Viewed

 
Arab World

Washington Links Israeli Withdrawal from Southern Lebanon to Hezbollah’s Disarmament

Local residents inspect the debris and rubble from a collapsed building hit by an overnight Israeli airstrike in the Haret Hreik neighborhood of Beirut's southern suburbs on June 6, 2025. (Photo by AFP)
Local residents inspect the debris and rubble from a collapsed building hit by an overnight Israeli airstrike in the Haret Hreik neighborhood of Beirut's southern suburbs on June 6, 2025. (Photo by AFP)
TT
20
TT

Washington Links Israeli Withdrawal from Southern Lebanon to Hezbollah’s Disarmament

Local residents inspect the debris and rubble from a collapsed building hit by an overnight Israeli airstrike in the Haret Hreik neighborhood of Beirut's southern suburbs on June 6, 2025. (Photo by AFP)
Local residents inspect the debris and rubble from a collapsed building hit by an overnight Israeli airstrike in the Haret Hreik neighborhood of Beirut's southern suburbs on June 6, 2025. (Photo by AFP)

Concerns are growing in Lebanon after the United States' reluctance to step in, either directly or through the International Monitoring Committee overseeing the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire agreement, and prevent Israel from further escalating its strikes in the country.

On Thursday, the Israeli military struck several buildings in Beirut’s southern suburbs that it said held underground facilities used by Hezbollah for drone production. The strikes, preceded by an Israeli warning to evacuate several buildings, came on the eve of Eid al-Adha.

What aggravated the Lebanese concerns was Israel’s prior notification to the United States of its plan to target these buildings, which were later found not to be used by Hezbollah for manufacturing drones.

According to official Lebanese sources who spoke to Asharq Al-Awsat on condition of anonymity, they said that Washington acknowledged that the buildings were not used by Hezbollah and directed blame at Tel Aviv citing that Israel’s justifications were unfounded.

But the US criticism of Tel Aviv is unlikely to deter the latter from carrying out further aggression against Lebanon, amid the failure of the monitoring committee to address Israel’s violations.

Washington blaming Israel will not change the reality on the ground as long as it enjoys a US cover that allows it to maintain pressure on Lebanon to set a timeline for Hezbollah’s disarmament linked to its own withdrawal from the south.

But Lebanon’s President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam have reiterated commitment to limiting weapons to the state’s control and urged the international community to pressure Israel into withdrawing from southern Lebanon.

Ministerial sources said that President Aoun stands firm in his position and is in ongoing communication with Hezbollah leadership paving way for dialogue aimed at ensuring the state’s exclusive control over arms once conditions are ripe for implementation.

The sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Hezbollah has no choice but to engage in serious dialogue, which is not intended as a stalling tactic while awaiting the outcome of US-Iranian negotiations on the nuclear file.

They also assure that Lebanon is committed to the continued presence of the monitoring committee overseeing the implementation of the ceasefire.

They point out that the upcoming dialogue with Hezbollah on securing the state’s exclusive control over weapons is a cornerstone of Lebanon’s national security strategy.

The sources question the absence of the US engagement in Lebanon mainly regarding the military developments and Israel’s escalation. They highlight that Lebanon is witnessing one of its darkest times compounded by Washington’s dismissal of Morgan Ortagus, the deputy special envoy for the Middle East, from handling the Lebanese file.

This move has left US Ambassador to Lebanon Lisa Johnson, and the entire Lebanese state, in a state of uncertainty, as Washington is reportedly considering sending Ambassador Thomas Barrett, although no official date has been announced for his arrival in Beirut.

Barrett is currently the US envoy to Türkiye and recently appointed by President Donald Trump as special envoy to Syria.

On the other hand, political sources interpret the current absence of the US role, and Israel’s unrestricted freedom to act against Hezbollah’s remaining military capabilities, as a deliberate strategy it uses to safeguard its borders.

It also links withdrawal from south Lebanon to a timeline for containing Hezbollah’s weapons and limiting it to the state’s control.

The White House endorses the principle of linking Israel’s withdrawal to Hezbollah’s disarmament as “it was crafted in the United States”, according to MPs who frequently visit Washington.

Lebanon has no choice but to adhere to that, viewing it as a mandatory passage to bring a political end to the Iranian interference in the region with the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, and to enter a new political phase for the Mediterranean country.