Lebanon's Opposition Tests its Unity in Electing the Deputy Speaker

Lebanese soldiers remove barbed wire from the road leading to the parliament (EPA)
Lebanese soldiers remove barbed wire from the road leading to the parliament (EPA)
TT
20

Lebanon's Opposition Tests its Unity in Electing the Deputy Speaker

Lebanese soldiers remove barbed wire from the road leading to the parliament (EPA)
Lebanese soldiers remove barbed wire from the road leading to the parliament (EPA)

Lebanon's opposition blocs and figures are set to face several challenges, beginning with the election of the parliament speaker and his deputy, followed by naming a prime minister, forming a government, and electing a president.

It will "test" the unity and coordination among its members to prove whether they can confront Hezbollah and its allies.

The Free Patriotic Movement and Hezbollah refuse to recognize that the parliamentary majority now belongs to the opposition.

The opposition will first face the challenge of electing the deputy speaker, given that Nabih Berri is the only candidate for the parliament's chairmanship and will most likely win, albeit by a small majority.

The deputy speaker's election was directly or indirectly discussed between the Lebanese Forces (LF), the Progressive Socialist Party, the Kataeb, and other "reformists."

Several candidates affiliated with some parties are being proposed for the position, including former Deputy Prime Minister Ghassan Hasbani of the Lebanese Forces, former Defense Minister Elias Bou Saab of the Free Patriotic Movement, and the former head of the Bar Association, Melhem Khalaf, of the reformists.

The parties denied supporting any candidate, despite unanimously agreeing that any figure assuming this position must have specific criteria.

Other nominees include MP Ghassan Skaf, who is close to the Progressive Socialist Party, and MP Sagih Attieh, who met with Berri and announced that he was ready to assume the position.

Kataeb MP Elias Hankash noted that the opposition forces must unify their position.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Kataeb did not and will not vote for Berri as Speaker.

However, regarding the election of his deputy, the party is doing its best to agree with other forces and representatives on one candidate, said Hankash.

He indicated that the party has been meeting with other "reformist" lawmakers, reiterating the importance of showing a united front in other matters as well, such as the government and the presidential elections.

Kataeb's politburo warned against compromises and bargains that had prevailed before the elections at the country's expense and its people.

"We reiterate that we would not … vote to any parliament speaker, deputy, prime minister, or president who covers Hezbollah's weapons and defends it under any pretext," it pointed out.

The party also warned against any obstruction and procrastination, saying that the Lebanese have expressed their opinions and everyone must comply with that.

LF head of communication and media Charles Jabbour asserted that different parties are exerting all efforts to agree on a single candidate for the deputy speaker’s post acceptable by all opposition forces.

Jabbour told Asharq Al-Awsat that this would set the foundation for the upcoming stage to agree on the designated prime minister and determine the cabinet that differs from its predecessors.

He asserted that the LF is not concerned with a particular figure but rather clear criteria that must be present in the candidate, which the party's leader previously determined.

LF chief Samir Geagea has announced that his party had set certain criteria for the speaker of parliament that do not apply to Berri, adding that his bloc would not vote for him.

Geagea called on the newly elected lawmakers to chart a new political path by selecting a speaker who would work to "preserve" the state's sovereignty.

"All strategic decision-making should return to the Lebanese state... and security and military matters should be handled exclusively by the Lebanese army," he said.

He pointed out that the same thing applies to the deputy speaker, who must agree to the same commitments.



Kurdistan Region Blames ‘Terrorist Group’ for Peshmerga Attack

Peshmerga forces during a celebration in Erbil, the capital of the Kurdistan Region, in 2023 (AFP)
Peshmerga forces during a celebration in Erbil, the capital of the Kurdistan Region, in 2023 (AFP)
TT
20

Kurdistan Region Blames ‘Terrorist Group’ for Peshmerga Attack

Peshmerga forces during a celebration in Erbil, the capital of the Kurdistan Region, in 2023 (AFP)
Peshmerga forces during a celebration in Erbil, the capital of the Kurdistan Region, in 2023 (AFP)

Five members of the Kurdish Peshmerga forces were wounded in two separate drone attacks targeting military positions in northern Iraq’s Duhok province, the Kurdistan Region Security Council said on Tuesday.

The council said the strikes occurred on Monday and Tuesday in the town of Amadiya, where surveillance posts were being set up. The attacks were carried out using drones, it added.

Kurdish intelligence sources suspect a splinter faction of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) was behind the strikes, suggesting the group aimed to disrupt ongoing peace efforts in both Türkiye and Syria.

“These are terrorist attacks,” the Security Council said in a statement, vowing to take “all necessary measures” against groups that threaten the region’s security and stability.

The PKK, which is considered a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, and the European Union, has been engaged in a decades-long insurgency against the Turkish state and maintains bases in northern Iraq.

The Kurdistan Region Security Council said Tuesday that the recent drone attacks on Peshmerga forces may have been intended to derail ongoing peace efforts among Kurdish groups across the region, as well as political developments within the Kurdistan Regional Government.

The council suggested the twin strikes in Duhok province were connected to peace negotiations between Türkiye and the PKK, as well as intra-Kurdish talks in northeast Syria, where Kurdish factions are seeking unity under what is known as the “Kurdish Unity Conference.”

It also linked the attacks to the final stages of forming the Kurdistan Region’s new government, warning that “certain groups and factions are working to obstruct peace and stability in the region.”

The comments came days after Syrian Kurdish factions held what was described as a “historic conference” in the northeastern city of Qamishli, calling for a decentralized democratic state.

The event brought together Kurdish delegations from Syria, Iraq, and Türkiye, and was attended by a US delegation.

Kurdish expert Kifah Mahmoud has suggested that factions within the PKK were likely behind the recent drone attacks on Peshmerga positions in northern Iraq.

Mahmoud told Asharq Al-Awsat that the attacks were linked to the ongoing peace initiatives in the region, both within Kurdish territories and at a broader geopolitical level.

“These developments are related to the peace processes, whether in the Kurdish regions or at the regional level,” Mahmoud said.

“We have positive negotiations between Türkiye and the PKK, as well as the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) moving toward a peaceful stance with Türkiye. Most importantly, there’s a positive trajectory in relations between Baghdad and Erbil, along with ongoing regional negotiations between Washington and Tehran.”

Mahmoud believes that these efforts are not well-received by more hardline factions within the PKK. He pointed out that the PKK has long been divided into parallel wings operating under different names in various active regions, with some factions opposed to peace initiatives in Kurdish territories.

While some Kurdish officials have speculated that Türkiye may be indirectly involved in the attacks, Mahmoud dismissed this theory, instead attributing responsibility to the more radical PKK factions based in areas such as the Qandil Mountains and Sinjar, as well as near Amadiya.

He also rejected suggestions that the strikes were aimed at disrupting the formation of the Kurdistan Region’s new government, asserting that the main objective was to undermine the ongoing peace processes within Kurdish areas.