Tehran Insists on Continuing Nuclear Talks amid Western Pessimism

Staffer removes the Iranian flag from the stage after a group picture with foreign ministers and representatives of the United States, Iran, other nations and the European Union on July 14, 2015. (AFP / Pool / CARLOS BARRIAA)
Staffer removes the Iranian flag from the stage after a group picture with foreign ministers and representatives of the United States, Iran, other nations and the European Union on July 14, 2015. (AFP / Pool / CARLOS BARRIAA)
TT
20

Tehran Insists on Continuing Nuclear Talks amid Western Pessimism

Staffer removes the Iranian flag from the stage after a group picture with foreign ministers and representatives of the United States, Iran, other nations and the European Union on July 14, 2015. (AFP / Pool / CARLOS BARRIAA)
Staffer removes the Iranian flag from the stage after a group picture with foreign ministers and representatives of the United States, Iran, other nations and the European Union on July 14, 2015. (AFP / Pool / CARLOS BARRIAA)

Iranian officials insisted on maintaining indirect negotiations with Washington, amid pessimism among Westrn diplomats about reviving the 2015 nuclear agreement, after the failure of the latest round hosted by Doha.

“Following Doha talks, we will coordinate with the EU on the next stage of talks,” Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations Majid Takht Ravanchi said on Twitter.

“Our team is ready to engage constructively to reach a deal. If the US acts realistically and shows serious intention to implement its obligations, agreement is not out of reach,” he added.

The Iranian ambassador was referring to his comments during a Security Council session on Thursday evening to discuss the latest report issued by United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on the implementation of the 2015 Security Council resolution on nuclear agreement, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
American, British and French diplomats at the Security Council blamed Iran for the failure of efforts to revive the agreement after more than a year of negotiations.

In parallel, new details were leaked from the indirect talks that took place between the US special envoy for Iran, Robert Malley, and the chief Iranian negotiator, Ali Bagheri Kani, mediated by European Union Envoy Enrique Mora, in Doha.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, a US official told Reuters that differences widened after the unsuccessful talks this week. He said the prospects for reaching an agreement after Doha were worse than before, and would worsen day by day.

“Their vague demands, reopening of settled issues, and requests clearly unrelated to the JCPOA all suggests to us… that the real discussion that has to take place is [not] between Iran and the US to resolve remaining differences. It is between Iran and Iran to resolve the fundamental question about whether they are interested in a mutual return to the JCPOA,” the senior American official said.

He added: “At this point, we are not sure if they [the Iranians] know what more they want. They didn’t come to Doha with many specifics. Most of what they raised they either knew – or should have known – was outside the scope of the JCPOA and thus completely unsellable to us and to the Europeans, or were issues that had been thoroughly debated and resolved in Vienna and that we were clearly not going to reopen.”



White House Wants Deep Cut in US Funding for War Crimes Investigations

The White House in Washington. (Reuters)
The White House in Washington. (Reuters)
TT
20

White House Wants Deep Cut in US Funding for War Crimes Investigations

The White House in Washington. (Reuters)
The White House in Washington. (Reuters)

The White House has recommended terminating US funding for nearly two dozen programs that conduct war crimes and accountability work globally, including in Myanmar, Syria and on alleged Russian atrocities in Ukraine, according to three US sources familiar with the matter and internal government documents reviewed by Reuters.

The recommendation from the Office of Management and Budget, which was made on Wednesday and has not been previously reported, is not the final decision to end the programs since it gives the State Department the option to appeal.

But it sets up a potential back-and-forth between the OMB and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his aides, who will reply to OMB with their suggestions on which programs deserve to continue.

The programs also include work in Iraq, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Colombia, Belarus, Sudan, South Sudan, Afghanistan and the Gambia, according to the sources and a list seen by Reuters.

The State Department declined to comment. OMB did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The expectation that Rubio would argue for many of the programs to be continued is slim, according to three US officials. However, the top US diplomat could make a case to keep crucial programs, such as aiding potential war crimes prosecutions in Ukraine, according to one source familiar with the matter.

Several of the programs earmarked for termination operate war crimes accountability projects in Ukraine, three sources familiar with the matter said, including Global Rights Compliance, which is helping to collect evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity across Ukraine, such as sexual violence and torture.

Another is Legal Action Worldwide, a legal aid group which supports local efforts to bring cases against Russian suspects of war crimes in Ukraine, the sources said.

Requests seeking comment from the groups were not immediately answered.

State Department bureaus that would like to preserve any war crimes and accountability programs should send their justifications by close of business day on July 11, said an internal State Department email seen by Reuters.

CHANGING PRIORITIES

Many of the programs recommended for termination are dedicated to empowering local organizations seeking to advance justice in societies that have faced atrocities, one of the sources said, adding that some programs have been going on for decades across Democratic and Republican administrations.

"Even if Secretary Rubio intervenes to save these programs, many of which he supported as a senator, there will be no one left to manage these programs," the source said.

The administration of President Donald Trump has frozen and then cut back billions of dollars of foreign aid since taking office on January 20 to ensure American-taxpayer money funds programs that are aligned with his "America First" policies.

The unprecedented cutbacks have effectively shut down its premier aid arm US Agency for International Development, jeopardized the delivery of life-saving food and medical aid and thrown global humanitarian relief operations into chaos.

The OMB recommendation is yet another sign that the administration is increasingly de-prioritizing advocacy for human rights and rule of law globally, an objective that previous US administrations have pursued.

While US foreign aid freezes had already started hampering an international effort to hold Russia responsible for alleged war crimes in Ukraine, Wednesday's recommendations raise the risk of US completely abandoning those efforts.

Among the programs that are recommended for termination is a $18 million State Department grant for Ukraine's Prosecutor General's Office that is implemented by Georgetown University's International Criminal Justice Initiative, two sources said.

An official at Georgetown declined to comment.

While the programs do not directly impact Ukraine's frontline efforts to fend off Russia's invasion, supporters say they represent the best chance of extensively documenting reported battlefield atrocities in Europe's biggest conflict since World War Two, now grinding toward a fourth year.

Ukraine has opened more than 140,000 war crime cases since Moscow's February 2022 invasion, which has killed tens of thousands, ravaged vast swathes of the country and left behind mental and physical scars from occupation. Russia consistently denies war crimes have been committed by its forces in the conflict.

PATH TO APPEAL

Other programs include one that does accountability work on Myanmar army's atrocities against Rohingya minorities as well as on the persecution of Christians and other minorities by Syria's ousted former president Bashar al-Assad, two sources said.

While the OMB recommendations could face State Department push-back, the criteria to appeal are set very strictly.

In an internal State Department email, the administration cautioned that any effort to preserve programs that were recommended to be terminated should be thoroughly argued and directly aligned with Washington's priorities.

"Bureaus must clearly and succinctly identify direct alignment to administration priorities," the email, reviewed by Reuters said.