Iraq’s Sadr Calls on Maliki to Turn Himself over to Judiciary

Supporters of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr gather for mass Friday prayer in the Sadr City district of Baghdad, Iraq, July 15, 2022. (Reuters)
Supporters of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr gather for mass Friday prayer in the Sadr City district of Baghdad, Iraq, July 15, 2022. (Reuters)
TT
20

Iraq’s Sadr Calls on Maliki to Turn Himself over to Judiciary

Supporters of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr gather for mass Friday prayer in the Sadr City district of Baghdad, Iraq, July 15, 2022. (Reuters)
Supporters of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr gather for mass Friday prayer in the Sadr City district of Baghdad, Iraq, July 15, 2022. (Reuters)

Cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, head of the Sadrist movement, called on Iraqi former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to turn himself over to the judiciary in wake of his explosive and damning voice recordings.

Known as the “Maliki WikiLeaks,” the recordings of the former premier include threats to Sadr and sharp criticism of the Popular Mobilization Forces.

Sadr had initially dismissed the recordings, calling on his supporters to do the same, saying he had “no regard” for Maliki.

He appeared to have shifted his position on Monday, posting a number of scathing tweets.

“We were completely astonished that the threat would come from the al-Dawa party of the Al Sadr, specifically from a senior figure, Maliki,” said Sadr, in reference to his uncle, Mohammed Baqir al-Sadr's founding of the Dawa party in 1957.

He called for “putting out the strife”, threatened to be ignited by Maliki’s remarks, “through joint condemnation by the leaders of blocs that are allied to him and by the elders of his tribe.”

“The condemnation should not be limited to his accusations that I am an Israeli agent, or having killed Iraqis, even though I saved their lives, including Maliki’s, in a past conflict in which he was the mastermind,” continued the cleric.

“Above all, Maliki violated the Iraqi security forces, accused the PMF of cowardice, incited strife and inter-Shiite fighting,” said Sadr.

Moreover, it was said that future recordings will even include threats to religious authorities.

Sadr urged his followers against attacking Maliki, whom he advised to quit political life and seek forgiveness from God or turn himself and corrupt associates over to the judiciary.

“Perhaps it may be an act of repentance before God and the Iraqi people,” Sadr added.

The cleric’s tweets appear to confirm the authenticity of the recordings, which put Maliki in a very tight spot.

The former PM had recently been offering statements of denial and apologies to Sadr and the PMF factions, which he described in the recordings as a “nation of cowards.”

He had to retract his words on Monday, describing the PMF as a “nation of mujahideen and martyrs”.

Maliki will likely have to issue more of these statements and tweets in the coming days as more recordings are expected to be posted.

Journalist Ali Fadhel has been posting around a minute of recordings a day. He says he has 48 minutes worth of voice recordings.

Analyst Nizar Haidar revealed to Asharq Al-Awsat that even more damning recordings of Maliki will be released, confirming that there are even videos that implicate him even further.

On Sunday, two lawyers filed complaints to the judiciary over Maliki’s statements.

On whether he can be pursued legally, a rights expert told Asharq Al-Awsat he “does not agree with claims that recordings are not enough evidence to accuse Maliki of terrorism.”

“Had similar evidence been submitted against any other person, they would have been sentenced to death within days,” he said on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue.

“Yes, the recordings may not be enough evidence to accuse him of terrorism, but they are enough for the case against him to go forward,” he added.

Such cases demand that the suspect be arrested immediately so that they can be prevented from influencing the probe and witnesses, who in turn, must be protected and encouraged to testify.



Demarcating the Lebanese–Syrian Border Tops Agenda of Trump’s Envoy in Beirut

Talks between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and US envoy Thomas Barrack two weeks ago in Beirut (AP). 
Talks between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and US envoy Thomas Barrack two weeks ago in Beirut (AP). 
TT
20

Demarcating the Lebanese–Syrian Border Tops Agenda of Trump’s Envoy in Beirut

Talks between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and US envoy Thomas Barrack two weeks ago in Beirut (AP). 
Talks between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and US envoy Thomas Barrack two weeks ago in Beirut (AP). 

US Ambassador to Türkiye Tom Barrack, President Donald Trump’s special envoy to Syria, is prioritizing the demarcation of the Lebanese–Syrian border during his meetings in Beirut this week with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and Army leadership.

The border issue is expected to feature prominently in Lebanon’s response to proposals Barrack presented, as he considers it essential for establishing a mechanism to implement the ceasefire agreement with Israel and asserting Lebanese sovereignty under UN Resolution 1701.

According to Lebanese ministerial sources speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Saudi Arabia recently hosted a Lebanese–Syrian meeting that defused tensions and ended clashes across the overlapping areas between the two countries in northern Bekaa. Riyadh’s mediation created a favorable climate to advance border demarcation along the roughly 375-kilometer frontier from north to east.

Saudi sponsorship of this process, along with measures by the joint Lebanese–Syrian committee to prevent further clashes, strengthened Washington’s interest in supporting these efforts. Much of the violence has stemmed from rival smuggling networks once protected by the former Syrian regime and used for trafficking Captagon into Lebanon and beyond.

Calls to demarcate the border date back to the National Dialogue Committee’s first session in 2006, convened by Berri. At Hezbollah’s request, the term “demarcation” was replaced with “delineation,” arguing it was more appropriate for relations between “brotherly nations.” Nevertheless, the issue remained unresolved as Syria refused to engage in formal negotiations, especially before the assassination of Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, when Damascus consistently blocked references to completing the Taif Agreement or withdrawing Syrian troops from Beirut.

Later attempts during Saad Hariri’s premiership under President Michel Sleiman also stalled when President Bashar al-Assad declined to cooperate, citing other priorities. Illegal crossings continued to proliferate, justified as necessary for Hezbollah’s movement to avoid Israeli monitoring and to maintain unregulated “military routes” for arms smuggling.

Sources revealed that in a Damascus meeting co-chaired by Hariri and Assad, Lebanon requested not only border demarcation but also a review of bilateral agreements under the Treaty of Brotherhood to address their pro-Syrian bias. While the status of the occupied Shebaa Farms was briefly raised, it was withdrawn to avoid jeopardizing talks. Though an agreement was reached to start demarcation from the northern border, Syrian officials later backed out, citing preoccupation with the Jordanian border.

Lebanon has since prepared a detailed file with maps and coordinates, ready to support renewed negotiations under President Ahmad al-Sharaa. Officials believe the time is now ripe to demarcate the border and end agreements that once facilitated Syria’s dominance over Lebanon.