Israeli PM Praises EU's Decision to Resume Association Council Sessions

Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid speaks during a cabinet meeting at the prime minster's office in Jerusalem, Sunday, July 17, 2022. (Abir Sultan/Pool Photo via AP)
Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid speaks during a cabinet meeting at the prime minster's office in Jerusalem, Sunday, July 17, 2022. (Abir Sultan/Pool Photo via AP)
TT
20

Israeli PM Praises EU's Decision to Resume Association Council Sessions

Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid speaks during a cabinet meeting at the prime minster's office in Jerusalem, Sunday, July 17, 2022. (Abir Sultan/Pool Photo via AP)
Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid speaks during a cabinet meeting at the prime minster's office in Jerusalem, Sunday, July 17, 2022. (Abir Sultan/Pool Photo via AP)

Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid has lauded the European Union's decision to resume the Association Council sessions with Israel for the first time in a decade.

Lapid said in a statement Tuesday that a new era has begun in the relations between the EU and Israel.

Political sources confirmed that Lapid intends to visit Brussels to attend a conference with EU foreign ministers, which he'll benefit from during his electoral campaign.

"The fact that the 27 foreign ministers of the European Union voted unanimously to strengthen economic and diplomatic ties with Israel is proof of Israel's diplomatic power and the government's ability to create new opportunities with the international community," said Lapid.

EU foreign ministers voted Monday unanimously in Brussels to revive the EU-Israel Association Council.

He indicated that the Council is the highest political body responsible for promoting the entirety of Israel's relations with the EU, including at the political, economic, and technological levels.

Lapid stated that the Council would allow Israel to continue developing its relations with the European Union in the interest and welfare of the citizens of Israel.

The EU maintained close relations with Israel to put forward the idea of including it as a member state. But the differences during the term of Benjamin Netanyahu created a rift in relations, which led to the cessation of Israeli participation in the Dialogue Council in 2012.

Last year, Lapid was invited to attend the meeting of EU foreign ministers, and the meeting of the Association Council was set as one of the main objectives of promoting Israeli-EU relations.

Over the past year, relations further developed, and they signed the Horizon program, which offers funding and cooperation on research and development in various domains.

Other examples are the visits of senior European officials to Israel, including European Parliament President Roberta Metsola and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

According to the Walla news website in Tel Aviv, this step is essential to improve relations between Israel and the EU and is a significant achievement for Lapid, who determined enhancing ties with the Union as one of his primary goals when he assumed the position of the foreign minister about a year ago.

The website reported that 27 foreign ministers of the EU Union attended their monthly meeting in Brussels, and the annual political meeting with Israel was on the agenda.

The report quoted a high-ranking official in the Israeli Foreign Ministry as saying that a meeting date between the two parties has not been set yet.

At a press conference in Brussels at the end of the Foreign Affairs Council meeting, EU High Commissioner for Foreign Affairs Josep Borrell said that the Union's position on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and support for the two-state solution has not changed.

"The position of the EU has not changed with respect to the Middle East peace process, and we will continue... supporting the two-state solution," said Borrell.

"We know the situation on the ground in the Palestinian territories is deteriorating, and I think ministers agree this association council is a good occasion to engage with Israel about these issues," he said, adding that it would be an appropriate time to think about the EU's position in the peace process.

A source at the far-right Israeli opposition revealed that right-wing parties in Brussels tried to dissuade the Union from taking this decision at this particular time so that it would not appear as interference in the Israeli elections in favor of Lapid.

However, almost all foreign ministers who attended the meeting agreed that there is no need to wait until after the Israeli elections in early November to convene.

Borrell noted that they will not necessarily wait until after the election on Nov 1 or for a new government to be formed.

"Who knows when the next Israeli government will be formed? Maybe it will be six months or a year," Borrell said.



India and Pakistan Agree to Immediate Ceasefire after US Diplomacy

A resident looks at his damaged house after cross-border shelling along the Line of Control (LoC) between Pakistan and India, in the Jura sector in Neelum Valley of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, on May 10, 2025. (AFP)
A resident looks at his damaged house after cross-border shelling along the Line of Control (LoC) between Pakistan and India, in the Jura sector in Neelum Valley of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, on May 10, 2025. (AFP)
TT
20

India and Pakistan Agree to Immediate Ceasefire after US Diplomacy

A resident looks at his damaged house after cross-border shelling along the Line of Control (LoC) between Pakistan and India, in the Jura sector in Neelum Valley of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, on May 10, 2025. (AFP)
A resident looks at his damaged house after cross-border shelling along the Line of Control (LoC) between Pakistan and India, in the Jura sector in Neelum Valley of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, on May 10, 2025. (AFP)

Nuclear-armed neighbors India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire on Saturday after US pressure and diplomacy, announcing a sudden stop to a conflict that had seemed to be spiraling alarmingly.

The four days of fighting that began on Wednesday were the worst between the old South Asian enemies in nearly three decades and threatened to erupt into a full-scale war in one of the world's most volatile and densely populated regions.

There were briefly fears that nuclear arsenals might come into play as Pakistan's military said a top body overseeing its nuclear weapons would meet.

But the defense minister said no such meeting was scheduled, hours after a night of heavy fighting in which the two countries targeted each other’s military bases and the combined civilian death toll rose to 66.

"Pakistan and India have agreed to a ceasefire with immediate effect," Foreign minister Ishaq Dar posted on X. "Pakistan has always strived for peace and security in the region, without compromising on its sovereignty and territorial integrity!"

The Indian foreign secretary said the two countries' military chiefs had spoken to each other and agreed that all fighting would stop at 5 p.m. Indian time (1130 GMT), without using the word "ceasefire".

US President Donald Trump posted: "After a long night of talks mediated by the United States, I am pleased to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE. Congratulations to both Countries on using Common Sense and Great Intelligence."

HOTLINES AND DIPLOMACY

Dar told the broadcaster Geo News that military channels and hotlines between India and Pakistan had been activated, and three dozen countries had actively helped to facilitate the agreement.

Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, India's most senior diplomat, said the two military chiefs would speak to each other again on May 12.

India on Wednesday attacked what it said was "terrorist infrastructure" in Pakistani Kashmir and Pakistan, two weeks after 26 people were killed in an attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir.

Pakistan denied India's accusations that it was involved in the attack. Days of cross-border fire, shelling and drone and missile attacks followed.

Despite the truce, two Indian government sources told Reuters that the punitive measures announced by India and reciprocated by Pakistan, such as trade suspension and visa cancellations, would remain in place for now.

The sources also said the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, a critical water-sharing pact that India suspended after the Kashmir attack, would continue to remain in abeyance.

The Indian foreign ministry did not respond to a request for comment.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that he and Vice President JD Vance had engaged with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Pakistan's Shehbaz Sharif, Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Pakistan's army chief Asim Munir, and the two national security advisors over the course of 48 hours.

TALKS TO FOLLOW AT NEUTRAL VENUE

In a post on X, Rubio commended Modi and Sharif on the agreement, which he said included not only an immediate ceasefire but also the start of talks on "a broad set of issues at a neutral site”.

Jaishankar said India had consistently maintained a firm and "uncompromising stance against terrorism in all its forms and manifestations" and would continue to do so.

News of the ceasefire was greeted with relief on both sides of the border and Pakistan's airports authority said its airspace had been fully reopened.

Omar Abdullah, chief minister of Indian Kashmir, which bore the brunt of the fighting, welcomed the truce but added: "If it had happened 2-3 days ago, the lives we lost would not have been lost."

Pakistani news channels showed tanks returning from the border.

"Both Pakistan and India need to lift their large populations on virtually every measure of socio-economic development," said Ehsan Malik, CEO of the Pakistan Business Council. "We are happy that a ceasefire will help both the governments to focus on this priority."

Shuja Nawaz, distinguished fellow at the Atlantic Council's South Asia Center, said the Indus treaty would figure prominently in the impending talks "after a decent interval, which allows both governments to claim credit for what they've achieved until now".

India and Pakistan have been locked in a dispute over Kashmir ever since they were born at the end of British colonial rule in 1947. Hindu-majority India and Muslim Pakistan both rule part of Kashmir but claim it in full.

They have gone to war three times, including twice over Kashmir, alongside numerous smaller outbreaks of fighting.

India blames Pakistan for an insurgency in its part of Kashmir that began in 1989 and has killed tens of thousands. It also blames Pakistani militant groups for attacks elsewhere in India.

Pakistan rejects both charges. It says it only provides moral, political and diplomatic support to Kashmiri separatists.