UNDP Official in Afghanistan to Asharq Al-Awsat: Taliban, ISIS Locked in Brutal War

The UNDP’s Resident Representative in Kabul, Afghanistan, Abdullah Dardari (Asharq Al-Awsat)
The UNDP’s Resident Representative in Kabul, Afghanistan, Abdullah Dardari (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

UNDP Official in Afghanistan to Asharq Al-Awsat: Taliban, ISIS Locked in Brutal War

The UNDP’s Resident Representative in Kabul, Afghanistan, Abdullah Dardari (Asharq Al-Awsat)
The UNDP’s Resident Representative in Kabul, Afghanistan, Abdullah Dardari (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The UNDP’s Resident Representative in Kabul, Afghanistan, Abdullah Dardari, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the political dialogue between the international body and the Taliban was constructive and making progress before the latter issued a decision to ban girls from education.

Dardari noted that the Taliban is fighting a vicious and explicit battle against ISIS.

In a Zoom interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, he pointed out that there is a statement from the “Taliban” that there is no room for al-Qaeda’s activity in Afghanistan and that authorities are monitoring the implementation of the decision.

On the issue of drugs, Dardari said that 10 % of the total agricultural areas of Afghanistan are planted with opium flowers.

“Afghanistan produces 80 % of the global production of opium flowers and has around four million addicts that include one and a half million women and children,” said Dardari.

According to Dardari, the opium flower trade generates between $2-$3 billion and has a market value of $200 billion.

Dardari noted that Afghanistan’s position was both a “blessing and a curse.”

Here’s the full text of the interview:

It will be the first anniversary of the significant change in Afghanistan in about a month. Can you describe your impressions of that turning point when US forces withdrew?

Last August 15, I was in my office in a meeting with the remaining staff. I had asked 77 international staffers to leave Afghanistan and 350 local personnel to work from home. I was expecting things to deteriorate. I had three international staffers and a few local workers in the office. The UN compound is in the southeast of Kabul, on the outskirts of the city.

My office manager came to me at half past ten in the morning and collapsed, saying, “They arrived” (to the compound gate).

Those were moments that evoked fear, fear of the unknown.

They knocked on the compound’s door and entered it without causing any problems, asking to speak with security officials. They assured the security officials that they were here to protect us and that there was no need to be afraid.

What happened?

The Taliban committed to two things: 1 - The UN staff has the right to enter any area in Afghanistan and communicate anywhere. 2- Full protection insurance.

We are touring Afghanistan and entering all the regions with an escort from the Taliban.

On August 15, I waited until the evening to call the UNDP leadership in New York, and was asked, “What do you want to do?” I decided that we had to stay and put together a team abroad based on a clear plan.

I arranged things, and I left a few days later for Dubai, where I gathered a team and was the first to return via Islamabad and joined the team members successively.

The UNDP has been operating in Afghanistan for 50 years and has never left, and I thought this approach could not be changed. Other UN organizations have also remained.

As the UNDP team, have you reached places in Afghanistan that you were not able to get under the previous government?

This is correct. I spent 13 hours on the road between Kandahar and Kabul, stretching over 465 km; Almost every 100 meters, there was a crater caused by an explosion. No side can expect victory in Afghanistan. This is an impossible war. We entered areas we had not entered before, neglected areas that lack health and educational services. Everyone we interviewed said they didn’t want a food basket but a job opportunity. Afghans are generous people and want to work.

What are the UNDP’s priorities? Will it be different from its priorities at the time of the previous government when it was perhaps aid without empowerment?

From the first moments, the absence of a government forced us to work with local communities, not with central institutions with which the results of cooperation were questionable. There were also wasted investments. We work with people on the ground, with rural women and youth. We provide funding and training as they run projects. We reach everywhere and support people directly.

The illiteracy rate in Afghanistan is at 70%, but they have a very high and sophisticated development awareness. Work here can be tiring and stressful, but we see immediate results. We secured 500,000 temporary jobs; This means that 500,000 families have an income after they could not know how to ensure their next meal.

Those people had said they were about to walk to Iran, then to Turkey and then Europe.

There is no international recognition of the Taliban government, but through your contacts with donors, major countries, and the US, did you raise the issue of releasing billions of frozen dollars that belong to the Afghans?

The position of UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres is to allow the Afghan people to benefit from their resources.

The frozen funds are about $7 billion. Development aid is worth $7 billion annually, and the total annual needs are $8.4 billion for humanitarian and development needs. Since August 15, the UNDP in Afghanistan has received $2.2 billion, of which $950 million has been transferred in cash.

I was afraid, after the start of the war in Ukraine, that there would be a decrease in the volume of aid to Afghanistan, but that did not happen, and the support continued at the same pace.

After the war in Ukraine, there was no change in the commitment of donors?

Regarding the UNDP in Afghanistan, there has been no change in either commitments or implementation.

Taliban’s Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani had expressed his frustration over the lack of recognition of the Taliban government. I appreciate that your work has nothing to do with politics, but have you put forward some steps that could facilitate recognition of their government?

This type of political discourse is left to expert parties. But, according to my knowledge, the dialogue was progressing well between the UN and the de facto authorities. Although they weren’t advancing in terms of recognition, the space available was expanding every day by donors.

There were exceptions to sanctions until the morning of March 23, when the Taliban issued a decision to prevent girls from education at the secondary level. This had a very negative impact on the atmosphere of dialogue. It was a constructive conversation.

We are also interested in reviving the Afghan banking system, which is on the verge of collapse, and we are still working.

Banning girls’ education at the secondary level was a negative shock.

How would you explain this decision?

Whenever we raise this issue with an official, their response is that this is a technical decision. One of the officials assured me in English, “Education for all is our policy.”

They cite technical reasons such as gender segregation in the classroom and providing female teachers. We have offered them help in these matters.

I want to point out here that several Afghan provinces continued to educate girls at the secondary level. There is an honest debate about it and no explanation for this decision.

Let’s talk about drugs in Afghanistan …

In Afghanistan, an area of 220 thousand hectares, about 10 % of the total agricultural areas, is planted with drugs.

Afghanistan produces 80 % of the world’s total production of opium, and has four million addicts, including one and a half million women and children, out of 40 million Afghans.

Returns from drug cultivation range between $2 billion and $3 billion dollars inside Afghanistan, but after manufacturing and exporting, the market value may reach $200 billion.

Is there a UN plan to deal with the drug issue?

The UNDP has an important program funded by the US Department of State to provide alternative crops. But the volume of drug intake represents the economy of a country. We are concerned, because there are 4 million addicts who need to be treated and followed up.

Alternative cultivations can not only be done through the UNDP, but it needs a huge joint work. A portion of the drug can be legitimately manufactured for the pharmaceutical industry. But there is no complete and ready-made program.

We are still in the phase of humanitarian work and securing primary humanitarian needs.

There is a reluctance to go to the purely developmental issue, as this needs to be dealt with by a government, and we work within restrictions, and propose solutions to immediate and long-term problems within a very narrow scope.

Tell us more about the position of the Taliban on ISIS and Al-Qaeda...

The Taliban are in fierce war and a clear battle with ISIS. They are killing and getting killed in those battles. As for Al-Qaeda, there is a clear and explicit declaration that there is no room for Afghanistan to be a place or a launching pad for terrorist operations. Authorities are monitoring the application of this declaration.

Can you speak about the importance of the geopolitical position of Afghanistan regarding the next stage, with the rise of China and the exit of the US from Afghanistan?

Afghanistan’s location is both an advantage and a curse. Its location could be an opportunity for Afghanistan to advance economically as its location contributes to regional economic interdependence.

The energy available in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan can only reach Pakistan and India through Afghanistan; So, it is a very important strategic location.

Also, moving from China to the Gulf passes through Afghanistan. The railway between the Mediterranean and Asia must pass through Afghanistan as well.

It must be noted that Afghanistan is landlocked. This makes it necessary to have access to ports freely to distribute their products. Afghanistan has a strategic position that no other country can take as it is located at the crossroads of Central and South Asia.

If you were a leader of the Chinese Communist Party in Beijing on August 15, would you worry?

I would have looked at it from an angle: How can my country benefit from these developments? The level of relationships is important. On the 25th of this month, a meeting of 40 countries will be held in Tashkent to discuss regional cooperation on and with Afghanistan.

Regardless of who rules Afghanistan, its position cannot be ignored. We have seen a significant increase in transit trade after the security situation has become much better, bribery levels have decreased, and moving from northern Afghanistan to the south has become more accessible.



Yemeni Interior Minister: Assassination Cells in Aden Backed by Foreign Funding, Seeking to Undermine State

Haidan stated that security coordination between Yemen and Saudi Arabia is at its highest levels (Photography: Turki Al-Oqaily)
Haidan stated that security coordination between Yemen and Saudi Arabia is at its highest levels (Photography: Turki Al-Oqaily)
TT

Yemeni Interior Minister: Assassination Cells in Aden Backed by Foreign Funding, Seeking to Undermine State

Haidan stated that security coordination between Yemen and Saudi Arabia is at its highest levels (Photography: Turki Al-Oqaily)
Haidan stated that security coordination between Yemen and Saudi Arabia is at its highest levels (Photography: Turki Al-Oqaily)

Yemen’s Interior Minister Major General Ibrahim Haidan revealed what he described as the foiling of the "largest political assassination plot" in the temporary capital Aden, saying security forces had carried out a successful pre-emptive operation against terrorist cells linked to foreign actors that were planning to target prominent political and security figures as part of what he called an “intelligence war” against the Yemeni state and its institutions.

In an extensive interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Haidan said investigations had uncovered foreign funding and logistical support for the cells behind the recent assassinations in Aden, adding that authorities found documents, maps and tools in the possession of cell members that exposed the scale of the plot and its objectives.

The minister said security coordination with Saudi Arabia was taking place "at the highest levels," describing ties between the two countries as a "shared destiny" and praising support provided by the Kingdom under the leadership of Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Salman bin Abdulaziz and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Prince Abdulaziz bin Saud, Saudi Interior Minister, during his reception of Major General Haidan in February 2024 (SPA)

Shared destiny with Saudi Arabia

Haidan stressed that Yemen’s relationship with Saudi Arabia represented a "shared destiny."

"Given the circumstances Yemen is going through, we find our brothers in Saudi Arabia dedicating all their efforts to supporting Yemen’s legitimate government in restoring the state and achieving security, economic and political stability," he said. "Therefore, Yemen’s security is an integral part of the region’s security."

He added that this made security coordination between Yemen and Saudi Arabia "at its highest levels," while expressing appreciation for the "generous and continued support" provided by the Kingdom, including in training, rehabilitation, logistical and technical assistance.

Haidan said the support had played a major role in ensuring the resilience and continuity of Yemen’s security institutions, adding: "We consider the Kingdom our primary strategic partner in the battle against terrorism."

Haidan explained that the assassination operations were an attempt to create social unrest to undermine public trust in the state (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Security situation in Aden

The minister said the security situation in liberated areas in general, and in the temporary capital Aden in particular, was seeing continuous improvement despite what he described as a "systematic targeting" of the city’s security aimed at undermining efforts to restore the state.

He said progress could be measured through several indicators, including the effectiveness and rapid response of security agencies, declining crime rates, and public support for state institutions. He added that those factors had helped foil what he described as the largest political assassination plot, although "the price was high."

According to Haidan, the plot claimed the lives of three prominent figures over recent weeks: Major Abdul Karim Abdullah, deputy director of the Seventh Security District; Dr. Abdulrahman Al-Shaer, director of Al-Nawras Schools; and Wissam Qaed, acting executive director of the Social Fund for Development.

He said the Interior Ministry, backed by military and intelligence institutions, was working to achieve security and stability under a comprehensive security plan aimed at strengthening state institutions and enforcing the rule of law, while noting positive cooperation from citizens.

Haidan added that security forces had become "more professional, disciplined and vigilant" in confronting threats posed by militias and their regional allies.

Why assassinations have returned

Haidan said the resurgence of assassinations in Aden was intended to create social unrest and erode public confidence in the state.

"By examining the nature of the targets chosen by militias backed by regional actors, we can understand the mechanism of the plot," he said. "The assassinations recently targeted the security sector, education and development, meaning that both the state and society were being targeted simultaneously."

He said the attacks were also aimed at obstructing efforts by the Presidential Leadership Council and the government to unify decision-making and normalize conditions in the country.

Who is behind the assassinations?

Responding to a question about those responsible for the recent assassinations in Aden, Haidan said security agencies, in coordination with the public prosecution, had made significant progress in collecting evidence and tracking leads.

"Many leads indicate that the rebellious coup militias received support from foreign parties to create chaos, disrupt the project of restoring the state and obstruct development efforts in liberated areas, especially Aden," he said.

Assassination of Wissam Qaed

Regarding threats allegedly received by Wissam Qaed from the Houthis before his killing, Haidan said the group had a long history of using assassinations as a political tool.

"The preliminary evidence and threats received by the martyr before his assassination place these militias under direct suspicion," he said, adding that the perpetrators may not necessarily have been directly affiliated with the Houthis but could have cooperated with allied groups pursuing a common goal of chaos and undermining the state.

Major General Haidan with General Fahd Al-Salman, Commander of the Joint Forces, in November 2024 (SPA)

Foreign funding and support

Haidan confirmed that some of the terrorist cells behind the assassinations had foreign links and had received financial and logistical backing.

"There is an intelligence war taking place on our soil aimed at shedding the blood of our people and dismantling the social fabric in order to undermine the state and obstruct the restoration of its institutions," he said.

He added that Yemen was coordinating with regional and international partners to "dry up the sources of cross-border terrorism."

Dismantling assassination cells

Speaking about the recently dismantled assassination cells, Haidan said the arrested group had been trained to carry out assassinations and plant explosive devices and included individuals with criminal records directly linked to a command center in Houthi-controlled areas.

He described the operation as a successful pre-emptive strike, adding that authorities had found documents, maps and tools revealing a major plot targeting prominent political and security figures.

Security in liberated areas

The minister said there had been "tangible progress" in the security situation across liberated provinces, noting growing coordination and integration among security agencies nationwide, with Aden receiving particular focus because of its political and symbolic significance.

He added that official statistics showed a slight decline in crime rates while maintaining the same level of enforcement.

"Compared with the first quarter of 2025, which recorded 3,111 crimes, the first quarter of 2026 recorded 3,064 crimes, with a clearance rate reaching 90 percent," Haidan said.


Lebanon’s Foreign Minister to Asharq Al-Awsat: Only the State Decides on Talks with Israel

Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi - File Photo
Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi - File Photo
TT

Lebanon’s Foreign Minister to Asharq Al-Awsat: Only the State Decides on Talks with Israel

Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi - File Photo
Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi - File Photo

Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi said Lebanon “has started to gradually reclaim its natural right to determine its own fate independently of others’ calculations,” stressing that the Lebanese state “alone holds the decision to negotiate,” and that Lebanon “is not subordinate to anyone and is not a card in the hands of any axis.”

He expressed regret that the state’s efforts to secure financial and political support for reconstruction “are being confronted by an internal party, Hezbollah, which continues to gamble with the fate of these villages and their residents in service of goals and agendas unrelated to the national interest or to the suffering of the people of the south.”

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Raggi said that “the national priority today is to fully restore sovereignty, without diminution,” adding that “there is no shame in the Lebanese state negotiating with Israel if the goal is to end the war and recover territory.”

He also condemned “what has been uncovered of roving sabotage networks linked to Hezbollah in a number of Arab countries,” while at the same time denouncing the targeting of brotherly Arab states and their security and stability.

 

Lebanese Minister of Foreign Affairs and Emigrants Youssef Raggi (L) meets UN Under-Secretary-General for Peace Operations Jean-Pierre Lacroix (R) at the Lebanese Foreign Ministry in Beirut, Lebanon, 07 January 2026. Lacroix is on an official visit to meet Lebanon's leaders. EPA/WAEL HAMZEH

Negotiations exclusively in the hands of the state

The Lebanese ambassador to Washington, Nada Hamadeh Mouawad, held a second direct meeting with her Israeli counterpart, Yechiel Leiter, at the US State Department to discuss extending the truce and to set a date and venue for negotiations between the two delegations, in what is the first track of direct talks since 1993.

Raggi noted: “Iran dragged Lebanon into a war that was neither the choice of the Lebanese state nor of the majority of the Lebanese, but was imposed on it under an approach that treats Lebanon as a pressure card to be used at regional and international negotiating tables.”

He continued: “This led to the step taken by President Joseph Aoun to pursue a path of direct negotiations, clearly declaring that the Lebanese state alone holds the decision to negotiate, and that Lebanon is not subordinate to anyone and is not a card in the hands of any axis.” He stressed that “this step is not limited to its negotiating dimension, but lays the groundwork for restoring independent national decision-making and reinstating the concept of the state as the sole reference in war, peace, and foreign policy.”

Raggi reaffirmed that “the Lebanese track is now separate from the Iranian track,” and that “Lebanon’s interests are no longer hostage to the progress or deadlock of Iranian negotiations,” noting that “the second preparatory meeting is being held while talks related to Iran are facing stagnation and complications, which proves that Lebanon has begun to gradually reclaim its natural right to determine its own fate independently of others’ calculations.”He said: “This is a pivotal moment in Lebanon’s modern history, as it ends a long phase in which national milestones were tied to external agendas.”

No longer an arena

Raggi said: “We will no longer accept using Lebanon as an arena for settling regional scores or as a platform for military and political adventurism whose cost is borne by the Lebanese in their security, economy, and national unity.” He explained: “Experience has shown that turning Lebanon into an open arena for conflict has brought it nothing but destruction, isolation, and collapse. What is required today is to reassert its position as a sovereign state, not as a sphere of influence or a permanent front line.”

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun holding talks with Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi (Presidency)

Objectives of negotiations

On the objectives of negotiations, Raggi said that “Lebanon’s move toward negotiations is intended to address outstanding issues between the two countries, foremost among them border, security, and humanitarian matters,” stressing that “negotiation is not surrender, as some try to portray it, but a tool for defending national interests when conducted from a position of state authority and with careful calculation.”He added: “The balance of power is not measured only in weapons, but also in the legitimacy of the state, unity of the national position, international support, and the ability to use law and diplomacy to protect rights.”

He noted that “it is a grave mistake to portray Lebanon as being in a position of absolute weakness, just as it is equally wrong to portray it as being in a position of surrender. The reality is that Lebanon, if its institutions are unified, can negotiate from a clear national-interest position.”

Raggi added: “The national priority today is to fully restore sovereignty, without diminution. There is no shame in the Lebanese state negotiating with Israel if the goal is to end the war, recover territory, and secure a lasting peace that preserves the dignity of the Lebanese and prevents the recurrence of tragedies, especially for our people in the south who have paid a heavy price in lives, homes, and livelihoods.”

He continued: “The futile adventures carried out through what are called ‘proxies’ have proven that their outcome was neither liberation nor victory, but further fragmentation and weakening of the Lebanese state and depletion of its society and economy.”

Monopoly of arms

Raggi said Lebanon “has long delayed implementing governmental and constitutional decisions related to restricting weapons to the state, particularly Hezbollah’s arms, at a time when the majority of Lebanese are calling for a real state that alone holds the right to use force.” He added: “Restricting arms is not a political demand by one side against another; it is the only gateway to building a modern state, because the very concept of the state fundamentally contradicts the existence of armed groups outside its authority. A state cannot exist with two sets of arms, two sovereignties, or two decisions on war and peace.”

He pointed out that “facts have shown that weapons outside state control did not liberate occupied land, did not protect Lebanese citizens, and did not prevent destruction; rather, they deepened national losses.”

He explained: “Before the ‘support for Gaza’ war and linking Lebanon to the Iranian confrontation, the disputed border points were limited and confined to known issues, including the thirteen points, the Shebaa Farms, and the Kfar Shouba hills. After October 7, 2023, Israeli occupation expanded inside Lebanese territory at five points, and after March 2, the occupied areas widened further, while dozens of villages were destroyed and vast areas suffered devastation and displacement.”

He added: “This catastrophic outcome confirms that the logic of uncontrolled arms did not produce protection; rather, Hezbollah’s war calculus ultimately imposed the path of direct negotiations as the only way to recover what Lebanon has lost.”

Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi - AFP

Targeting Arab states

Raggi strongly condemned “the discovery of roving sabotage networks linked to Hezbollah in a number of Arab countries.” He said: “This behavior is another example of the nature of the cross-border Iranian project, and its danger is not limited to Lebanon’s sovereignty but also extends to the security of sister and friendly states that have long stood by Lebanon in its most difficult times.”

He added: “We have informed our friends in the concerned countries of Lebanon’s full readiness for judicial and security cooperation, to pursue those responsible for these networks and provide all necessary assistance. We also reiterate our absolute rejection of using Lebanese territory or any Lebanese entity to harm the security of any Arab or friendly country.”

Hezbollah ‘gambling with the south’

Meanwhile, Israel continues explosions in border villages in the south. Raggi said: “We are closely following developments on the ground in the south, particularly the security belt imposed by Israel. The Foreign Ministry is working through all available diplomatic channels to achieve a full Israeli withdrawal, ensure residents can return to their villages, and launch reconstruction.”

He added: “But it is regrettable that while the state seeks to secure financial and political support for rebuilding, it faces an internal party, Hezbollah, that continues to gamble with the fate of these villages and their residents in service of goals and agendas unrelated to Lebanon’s interest or the suffering of the people of the south.”

Raggi said: “The painful scene of destroyed villages in the south, and of residents who have lost their homes, livelihoods, and sense of safety, should be a moment for courageous national reassessment,” stressing that “those who caused this war and dragged Lebanon into it against the will of its people must bear their political, moral, and historical responsibility and review their calculations before it is too late.”

Raggi affirmed that “Lebanon can no longer bear others’ wars, their projects, or illusions of victory that bring only ruin.” He concluded: “The future must belong to the state, to sovereignty, and to a just peace that protects all Lebanese.”


Healey to Asharq Al-Awsat: UK Has More Jets Flying in the Region Than at Any Time in the Last 15 Years

British Secretary of State for Defense John Healey arrives for a cabinet meeting at 10 Downing Street in London, Britain, 24 March 2026.  EPA/ANDY RAIN
British Secretary of State for Defense John Healey arrives for a cabinet meeting at 10 Downing Street in London, Britain, 24 March 2026. EPA/ANDY RAIN
TT

Healey to Asharq Al-Awsat: UK Has More Jets Flying in the Region Than at Any Time in the Last 15 Years

British Secretary of State for Defense John Healey arrives for a cabinet meeting at 10 Downing Street in London, Britain, 24 March 2026.  EPA/ANDY RAIN
British Secretary of State for Defense John Healey arrives for a cabinet meeting at 10 Downing Street in London, Britain, 24 March 2026. EPA/ANDY RAIN

British Defense Secretary John Healey revealed Wednesday that UK pilots and aircrew have flown over 1,200 hours on defensive missions across the Middle East since the conflict with Iran erupted, saying they have now had over 80 engagements together with RAF Regiment Gunners.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat following his visit to Saudi Arabia, Healey said that the UK has around 1,000 personnel in the region and an extra 500 air defense personnel in Cyprus.

“I continue to work closely with our partners in the region on what further support we can provide,” he said, lauding the UK-Saudi Arabia defense partnership which he said is “founded on mutual security interests and longstanding industrial collaboration.”

“Although our friendship is historic, it has evolved into a modern partnership that responds to contemporary challenges,” he added.

On ties between Moscow and Iran, Healey did not rule out a hidden Russian hand behind some of the Iranian tactics.

The following are the key points from the interview:

80 engagements

“UK pilots and aircrew have flown over 1,200 hours on defensive missions across the region. Together with our RAF Regiment Gunners, they have now had over 80 engagements since the conflict began,” said Healey.

“I am proud of the work that our UK Armed Forces are doing alongside our Gulf partners to help keep people safe in the region. Their dedication and professionalism is helping to save lives as Iran indiscriminately targets countries across the Gulf,” he added.

Heavy Deployment

“The UK has around 1,000 personnel deployed to the region, not including our personnel in Cyprus,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat. “Force protection is at the highest levels for UK bases in the region.”

“We have more UK jets flying in the region than at any time in the last 15 years. We are undertaking defensive counter air operations over Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar, and the UAE as well as Cyprus,” he said.

“Since January, I have deployed extra equipment and people to the region. This includes Typhoon and F-35 jets, Wildcat helicopters armed with purpose-built counter-drone Martlet missiles, a Merlin Crowsnest helicopter, providing airborne surveillance and control plus radar systems, air defense systems and counter-drone units.”

He added that there are now an extra 500 air defense personnel in Cyprus, and the warship, HMS Dragon - which is fully integrated within the layered air defense system with allies and partners - is deployed in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Defense Systems to Support the Gulf

“I continue to work closely with our partners in the region on what further support we can provide, which was the purpose of my visit (to Riyadh) this week,” Healey told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I confirmed during my meeting with the Defense Minister, His Royal Highness Prince Khalid bin Salman Al Saud, that we will deploy Sky Sabre to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - an air defense system that will be integrated into Saudi Arabia’s defenses to support Saudi Arabia's efforts in repelling Iran's attacks,” he added.

He also said that Rapid Sentry – a system made up of a radar and a missile launcher – was deployed to Kuwait, and Lightweight Multiple Launchers to Bahrain.

“We have extended the operations of our jets in Qatar which are flying defensive missions every night, and through Taskforce Sabre we're ensuring UK industry steps up too. The Taskforce brings together industry who offer counter drone and air defense capabilities with governments, including Gulf partners ... to rapidly provide them with the equipment they need.”

Advanced defense partnership with Saudi Arabia

On his visit to Saudi Arabia, he said the trip was aimed at showing support “during this period of sustained and indiscriminate Iranian attacks, and also to discuss further cooperation between our nations to protect our people and our shared interests in the Kingdom. That's why I was delighted to meet with His Royal Highness Prince Khalid bin Salman to discuss recent events in the region.”

“The UK and Saudi Arabia have a close, longstanding friendship, and share a decades-long defense partnership, founded on mutual security interests and longstanding industrial collaboration.”

That friendship “has evolved into a modern partnership that responds to contemporary challenges. This really matters in times like today: it means we have the trust and the shared understanding to respond quickly and decisively when the security environment demands it. It is precisely because of that deep foundation that we are able to act as we have done, such as deploying Sky Sabre to Saudi Arabia.”

Russian-Iranian cooperation

On Russia’s role in the Iran war, Healey said: “Our assessment is that, even prior to US and Israeli strikes, Russia highly likely shared intelligence and provided training to Iran, including on things such as drone technology and operations, and electronic warfare. And our intelligence also indicates that this cooperation is ongoing.”

“No one will be surprised that Putin’s hidden hand may be behind some of the Iranian tactics and potentially some of their capabilities as well. We see an axis of aggression between Russia and Iran - two countries that menace their neighbors and that pose a threat more widely to us all.”

No assessment on targeting Europe

Healey said that there is no assessment Iran is trying to target Europe with missiles. “Even if they did, we have the resources and alliances we need to keep the UK and our allies safe from any kind of attacks, whether it's on our soil or from abroad. The UK stands ready 24/7 to defend itself and protection of forces is at the highest levels for our bases in the region.”