US Adheres to Its Conditions, Keeps Door Open for Iran’s Return to Nuclear Deal

General view of the Bushehr main nuclear reactor (Reuters)
General view of the Bushehr main nuclear reactor (Reuters)
TT
20

US Adheres to Its Conditions, Keeps Door Open for Iran’s Return to Nuclear Deal

General view of the Bushehr main nuclear reactor (Reuters)
General view of the Bushehr main nuclear reactor (Reuters)

The US Special Representative for Iran, Robert Malley, is scheduled to brief members of the House Foreign Relations Committee on Sept. 14 in a classified setting about the recent developments in the nuclear negotiations with Iran.

US media said several developments could take place on the negotiations before the session, hinting that the recent complications after Tehran’s “unconstructive” response may not be a “final response.”

The statements of US officials that the nuclear agreement is the best option to deal with Tehran indicate Washington’s intention to encourage Tehran to let go of its “unrealistic” conditions.

Malley last briefed the Congress, along with White House Middle East coordinator Brett McGurk, on the status of the talks on Jun 15.

No concessions before the US elections

The Democratic Party has increased its pressure on the US administration to prevent further “concessions” to Tehran ahead of the midterm elections. Bipartisan lawmakers signed a letter to President Joe Biden calling for a return to Congress before signing any agreement with Iran.

Last week, negotiators seemed to be making progress toward reviving the Iran nuclear deal after Iran appeared to drop several key demands.

Tehran wanted to close the investigations of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) before it would agree to any deal.

The US State Department reiterated that Washington is determined to complete investigations into the effects of uranium found in three previously undeclared Iranian nuclear sites.

It rejected linking a revival of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal with the closure of investigations by the UN atomic watchdog.

On Friday, the White House stressed there should not be any conditionality between re-implementing the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and investigations related to Iran's legal obligations under the Non-proliferation Treaty.

The ball is in Tehran's court

Observers believe the ball is now in Iran’s court, preparing to obtain significant concessions.

Some believe that Tehran's threat to increase uranium enrichment to more than 93 percent are desperate attempts, given its knowledge that its possession of nuclear weapons will present significant obstacles from the West, Israel, neighboring countries, and even Russia.

On Friday, Iran returned two captured US maritime drones after being confronted by US destroyers, but the unmanned vessels were missing their cameras.

It wasn’t clear if the Iranians kept the cameras, the official added, or if they fell off when the Iranians hauled the drones out of the Red Sea and later put them back in the water.

US officials have said that the cameras, radars, and other drone equipment are commercially available and aren’t classified technology. But retaining the cameras and inspecting the drones up close could give Iran a better idea of the system’s capabilities.

The Navy has been deploying a network of advanced aerial and maritime sensors in the region, known as Task Force 59, designed to use artificial intelligence to monitor Iran’s activities at sea and potential threats.

The US first began deploying maritime drones in October. The vessels are 23-feet-long, rely on wind and solar power, and are equipped with cameras, radars, and other sensors.

Reuters reported that Iran state television earlier on Friday acknowledged the Iranian Navy released two US maritime drones in the Red Sea but accused the American unmanned vessels of jeopardizing naval safety.

A US defense official suggested the Iranians sought to secretly seize the drones, pulling the sail drones entirely out of the water on Thursday and then covering them with tarps.

He said Iran initially denied having US property before returning them on Friday to the US warships that converged on the scene.



UN Warns US Aid Cuts Threaten Millions of Afghans with Famine

(FILES) Afghan men stand in a queue as they wait to receive food being distributed as an aid by the World Food Program (WFP) organization at Nawabad Kako Sahib area in Baraki Barak district of Logar Province on January 7, 2024. (Photo by Wakil KOHSAR / AFP)
(FILES) Afghan men stand in a queue as they wait to receive food being distributed as an aid by the World Food Program (WFP) organization at Nawabad Kako Sahib area in Baraki Barak district of Logar Province on January 7, 2024. (Photo by Wakil KOHSAR / AFP)
TT
20

UN Warns US Aid Cuts Threaten Millions of Afghans with Famine

(FILES) Afghan men stand in a queue as they wait to receive food being distributed as an aid by the World Food Program (WFP) organization at Nawabad Kako Sahib area in Baraki Barak district of Logar Province on January 7, 2024. (Photo by Wakil KOHSAR / AFP)
(FILES) Afghan men stand in a queue as they wait to receive food being distributed as an aid by the World Food Program (WFP) organization at Nawabad Kako Sahib area in Baraki Barak district of Logar Province on January 7, 2024. (Photo by Wakil KOHSAR / AFP)

Fresh US cuts to food assistance risk worsening already widespread hunger in Afghanistan, according to the World Food Program, which warned it can support just half the people in need -- and only with half rations.
In an interview with AFP, WFP's acting country director Mutinta Chimuka urged donors to step up to support Afghanistan, which faces the world's second-largest humanitarian crisis, AFP said.

A third of the population of around 45 million people needs food assistance, with 3.1 million people on the brink of famine, the UN says.

"With what resources we have now barely eight million people will get assistance across the year and that's only if we get everything else that we are expecting from other donors," Chimuka said.

The agency already has been "giving a half ration to stretch the resources that we have", she added.

In the coming months, WFP usually would be assisting two million people "to prevent famine, so that's already a huge number that we're really worried about", Chimuka said.

Already grappling with a 40 percent drop in funding for this year globally, and seeing a decline in funding for Afghanistan in recent years, WFP has had to split the standard ration -- designed to meet the daily minimum recommended 2,100 kilocalories per person.

"It's a basic package, but it's really life-saving," said Chimuka. "And we should, as a global community, be able to provide that."
WFP, like other aid agencies, has been caught in the crosshairs of funding cuts by US President Donald Trump, who signed an executive order freezing all foreign aid for three months shortly after his inauguration in January.

Emergency food aid was meant to be exempt, but this week WFP said the United States had announced it was cutting emergency food aid for 14 countries, including Afghanistan, amounting to "a death sentence for millions of people" if implemented.

Washington quickly backtracked on the cuts for six countries, but Afghanistan -- run by Taliban authorities who fought US-led troops for decades -- was not one of them.

If additional funding doesn't come through, "Then there's the possibility that we may have to go to communities and tell them we're not able to support them. And how do they survive?"

She highlighted the high levels of unemployment and poverty in the country, one of the world's poorest where thousands of Afghans are currently being repatriated from Pakistan, many without most of their belongings or homes to go to.

'Vicious cycle'
The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, UNAMA, this week urged international donors to keep supporting Afghanistan, saying 22.9 million needed assistance this year.

"If we want to help the Afghan people escape the vicious cycle of poverty and suffering, we must continue to have the means to address urgent needs while simultaneously laying the groundwork for long-term resilience and stability," said Indrika Ratwatte, the UN's resident and humanitarian coordinator in Afghanistan, in a statement.

The statement warned that lack of international aid in Afghanistan could lead to increased migration and strain on the broader region.

The call for funding comes as other countries including Germany and Britain have also made large cuts to overseas aid.

But the Trump administration cut has been the deepest. The United States was traditionally the world's largest donor, with the biggest portion in Afghanistan -- $280 million -- going to WFP last fiscal year, according to US State Department figures.

But other UN agencies, as well as local and international NGOs are being squeezed or having to shut down completely, straining the network of organisations providing aid in Afghanistan.

The Trump administration also ended two programs -- one in Afghanistan -- with the UN Population Fund, an agency dedicated to promoting sexual and reproductive health, the agency said Monday.

And other organisations working on agriculture -- on which some 80 percent of Afghans depend to survive -- and malnutrition are impacted.

"We all need to work together," said Chimuka. "And if all of us are cut at the knees... it doesn't work."