How Did the Founder of Saudi Arabia Impose Himself as a Political Reality on Two Empires?

A meeting between King Abdulaziz and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1945 (Getty Images)
A meeting between King Abdulaziz and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1945 (Getty Images)
TT

How Did the Founder of Saudi Arabia Impose Himself as a Political Reality on Two Empires?

A meeting between King Abdulaziz and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1945 (Getty Images)
A meeting between King Abdulaziz and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1945 (Getty Images)

Dr. Princess Jawaher bint Abdul Mohsen bin Jalawi Al Saud, a researcher in Saudi history, said that King Abdulaziz set among his goals, priorities, and strategies to deal with the poles of power during the early years of the Kingdom’s establishment.

According to the researcher, he sought to adopt a policy of neutrality without making concessions, while rejecting everything that could undermine Saudi Arabia’s independence.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat on the occasion of the 92nd anniversary of the Saudi National Day, Princess Jawaher pointed to documents and messages exchanged between the British and Ottoman empires, which suggested that the Saudi king possessed power, political status and influence over his regional environment. His presence became a political reality that was difficult to ignore at that time.

Dr. Jawaher Al Saud pointed to historic documents that highlighted lack of British support for King Abdulaziz in the early stages of the Kingdom’s establishment.

She refused, however, to consider the Treaty of Darin, signed between Saudi Arabia and Britain in 1915 during the outbreak of the First World War as unfair, noting that the king “was clever in using it and employing it for his benefit thanks to his awareness of political developments and the change in the balance of forces” at that time.

Asked about the British sovereign government’s dealing with King Abdulaziz’ demand to reclaim Al-Ahsa, she said regaining Al-Ahsa was not only the result of political developments, but thanks to the firm determination of the Saudi king.

The influence and contacts of King Abdulaziz did not only raise questions among the senior politicians of the British government, but historic documents revealed the difference of views between the British government of India, which supported the king’s demand to reclaim Al-Ahsa, and the London-based government, which preferred to maintain its interests in the coastal strip of the Gulf, according to the historian.

She recounted that after a long exchange of messages between the two governments, the British government refused to disrupt the balance of power in the region for the sake of King Abdulaziz, and contented itself with monitoring the developments of Najd. The Government of India and its consuls in the Gulf, on the other hand, pointed to the increasing influence and control of King Abdulaziz, which reached the north to Al-Qassim, after his success in preventing the tribes from contacting the Turkish soldiers and carrying their mail and supplies.

Dr. Jawaher Al Saud said that British documents revealed how King Abdulaziz’ goals and victories preoccupied the politicians of London and the British government of India. Those saw that relations with the king would strengthen the position of the British government, and would reflect on the consolidation of security in the region.

She said that in Rabi’ al-Thani 1329 AH - April 1911 AD, the British Political agent in Kuwait met with King Abdulaziz, who told him that he would rely on his sword and destiny, and that he was determined to expel the Turks from Al-Ahsa. The Political Commissioner recommended the necessity of serious attention to the Saudi king, who is capable of leading the Arabian Peninsula and its tribes.

Despite the opposition of the political agent in Kuwait to the idea of reclaiming Al-Ahsa, which he described in his report as “a foolish attempt because of the consequences and dangers that would lead to confronting the Ottoman Turkish government,” King Abdulaziz decided to rely on his own strength without coordinating with Britain.

On the fifth of Jumada al-Awwal 1331 AH – April, 11 1913 AD, the king recaptured al-Ahsa and expelled the Ottoman Turkish military base without British assistance.

The response of the Ottoman Turkish government came in the form of military moves along the coast, without any military or political weight.

King Abdulaziz maintained his endeavor to try to strengthen his friendship with Britain and gain its support as the striking force in the region. He was advised by British officials to coordinate with the Ottoman Turkish government, which has nominal sovereignty in the region. As a result, the Saudi-Turkish negotiations began, in which the king stressed his independence and rights in the coast.

The British documents revealed a radical shift in London's policy towards Saudi Arabia. With the imminent declaration of World War I, Britain realized the strategic and military importance of King Abdulaziz. Consequently, the British Foreign Office recommended the need to reconsider the Saudi-British relations. Britain sought to obstruct the Turkish-Saudi negotiations by sending its envoys to King Abdulaziz - who had become the most powerful ruler in the Arabian Peninsula - on a mission to verify his views in order to enable the British government to find means of coexistence.

King Abdulaziz did not miss the opportunity to benefit from the Saudi-British Darin agreement, the historian said. Although some people found that the terms of the agreement were unfair, the princess asserted that the king was skillful and clever in using it to his advantage, as he was aware of the political developments and the change in the balance of power in the world.



Islamic Ministers’ Executive Council Condemns Iran’s Attacks on the Region

Saudi Minister of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance Sheikh Dr. Abdullatif Al Alsheikh addresses the conference. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Saudi Minister of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance Sheikh Dr. Abdullatif Al Alsheikh addresses the conference. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Islamic Ministers’ Executive Council Condemns Iran’s Attacks on the Region

Saudi Minister of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance Sheikh Dr. Abdullatif Al Alsheikh addresses the conference. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Saudi Minister of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance Sheikh Dr. Abdullatif Al Alsheikh addresses the conference. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The Executive Council of the Conference of Ministers of Awqaf and Islamic Affairs condemned the deliberate Iranian attacks on Saudi Arabia, the Gulf and Jordan, accusing Tehran of seeking to destabilize the region, terrorize civilians, kill innocents and target homes, infrastructure, desalination plants, airports and diplomatic missions.

In a statement after a virtual meeting in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, the council said the attacks violated Islamic values and principles, good neighborliness, international treaties and international law, and posed a threat to international peace and security.

The council said the attacks could not be justified under any pretext and called on Iran to halt them immediately and stop supporting, funding or arming affiliated militias.

Saudi Minister of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance and Chairman of the council Sheikh Dr. Abdullatif Al Alsheikh urged condemnation of the heinous attacks by Iran and its militias on Saudi Arabia, Gulf Cooperation Council states and Jordan.

He said the attacks violated Islamic principles and international laws, undermined regional security and reflected a reckless attempt to push the region toward chaos and strife.

Alsheikh said Saudi Arabia and its leadership were capable of defending the country, protecting Islamic holy sites and confronting any threat to its security and resources.

The Kingdom had strengthened national unity, with citizens rallying behind the leadership and supporting its decisions, he added.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, the minister said the meeting came at a time of “abnormal circumstances” in the Muslim world marked by rising aggression.

He accused Iran of carrying out daily hostile acts, including launching drones and missiles without justification toward Saudi Arabia, Gulf states and Jordan, and said those countries remained steadfast, strong and aware of their responsibilities toward their religion, leadership and nations.


Saudi FM, Russian Counterpart Discuss Regional Developments

Saudi Minister of Foreign Affairs Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah/File Photo
Saudi Minister of Foreign Affairs Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah/File Photo
TT

Saudi FM, Russian Counterpart Discuss Regional Developments

Saudi Minister of Foreign Affairs Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah/File Photo
Saudi Minister of Foreign Affairs Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah/File Photo

Saudi Minister of Foreign Affairs Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah held a phone call with Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov, during which they discussed the latest developments in the region, the Saudi Press Agency said on Thursday.

The discussion comes amid heightened tensions in parts of the Middle East, prompting continued diplomatic engagement between major international stakeholders.

 


Gulf States Pursue IRGC, Hezbollah Cells Amid Ongoing Attacks

 Suspects identified as fugitives abroad (Bahrain’s Interior Ministry) 
Suspects identified as fugitives abroad (Bahrain’s Interior Ministry) 
TT

Gulf States Pursue IRGC, Hezbollah Cells Amid Ongoing Attacks

 Suspects identified as fugitives abroad (Bahrain’s Interior Ministry) 
Suspects identified as fugitives abroad (Bahrain’s Interior Ministry) 

Gulf Cooperation Council states are pursuing hunting down terrorist cells linked to Tehran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah, as they continue to counter Iranian attacks, intercepting more than 6,246 missiles and drones, according to the Gulf Research Center.

Monitoring by Asharq Al-Awsat shows that within 30 days, Gulf security services uncovered nine cells tied to Iran or its allies, particularly Hezbollah, across four countries: Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and the UAE.

The first cell was announced in Qatar on March 3, and the latest on March 30—meaning all nine were dismantled within 27 days, or roughly one Iran-linked cell every three days.

Seventy-four suspects across nine Iranian cells

About 74 individuals were arrested or identified across the nine cells, according to official data. They include nationals of Kuwait, Lebanon, Iran, and Bahrain.

According to official statements and confessions, the suspects were involved in coordinating with operatives abroad in ways that undermine state sovereignty and endanger public safety. Charges include raising funds for attacks, plotting assassinations targeting leaders and public figures, damaging strategic interests, infiltrating national economies, and executing schemes that threaten financial stability.

They also face accusations of espionage, collecting intelligence on military and critical sites, and possessing drones and coordinates of sensitive locations.

“Exporting the revolution”

The activities and charges mirror previously uncovered Iran-linked networks in the Gulf. Gulf security specialist Dhafer Alajmi said Iran has pursued a policy of exporting its 1979 revolution, turning sleeper cells into an existential threat to Gulf states.

Gulf countries began dismantling such networks early in the current conflict. The first announced operation came less than 72 hours after the outbreak of US, Israeli, and Iranian military confrontations, reflecting heightened security vigilance.

In Bahrain, authorities uncovered three cells involving 14 individuals, including 12 detained and two identified as fugitives abroad.

In Kuwait, three cells linked to the banned Hezbollah group involved 45 individuals, some arrested and others identified overseas.

The UAE announced the dismantling of a network linked to Hezbollah and Iran comprising five members.

Qatar, the first to act on March 3, said two cells working for the Revolutionary Guards involved 10 suspects.

A three-dimensional strategy

Alajmi said Tehran relies on a three-dimensional strategy to encircle the region: local terrorist cells, recruitment within Gulf states to carry out bombings and assassinations, and regional armed proxies such as the Houthis and Hezbollah to exert missile and drone pressure.

He also pointed to “nuclear blackmail,” using nuclear facilities as cover for destabilizing activities and as leverage against the international community.

He said Gulf states have demonstrated exceptional efficiency through preemptive operations that foiled dozens of plots and uncovered weapons and explosives linked to the Revolutionary Guard.

He cited strict anti-money laundering and counterterrorism financing laws that have constrained Iran-linked networks financially, alongside defense alliances, enhanced security coordination such as the Peninsula Shield Force, and advanced air defense systems.

He added that public awareness has denied such cells a supportive environment, turning them from pressure tools into losing assets.

“An old, renewed tactic”

Bahraini writer Faisal Al-Sheikh said targeting Bahrain and the wider Gulf through terrorist cells and proxy networks is a long-standing Iranian tactic central to its proxy warfare strategy, aimed at undermining states from within and spreading instability.

He described it as a system built on recruiting agents and exploiting weak loyalties, calling it “organized betrayal.”

Lebanese political analyst Ibrahim Raihan said Tehran uses such cells to destabilize Gulf states and signal that any attack on it would trigger broader regional chaos.

Developments since the start of hostilities show Gulf forces have not only intercepted attacks in the air but are also engaged in a parallel ground campaign to dismantle Iran-linked networks operating within their borders.