US Supports Iran Protests, Lawmakers Condemn Biden for Lack of Action

People participate in a protest against Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi outside of the United Nations on September 21, 2022 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)
People participate in a protest against Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi outside of the United Nations on September 21, 2022 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

US Supports Iran Protests, Lawmakers Condemn Biden for Lack of Action

People participate in a protest against Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi outside of the United Nations on September 21, 2022 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)
People participate in a protest against Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi outside of the United Nations on September 21, 2022 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)

US lawmakers had various reactions to the protests in Iran, ranging from strong support to direct criticism of the US administration's policy toward Tehran.

Protests in Iran continued over the death of Mahsa Amini and statements of support from bipartisan lawmakers are pouring in.

Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn showed her support for Iranian women, tweeting: "I stand with the brave women of Iran fighting back against their oppressive government.

Amini was arrested for allegedly breaking headscarf rules and died on Sept. 16. The Iranian police said she died of a heart attack and wasn't mistreated, but her family has cast doubt on that account.

Iran has arrested more than 1,200 protesters, officials said Monday, in its lethal crackdown on 10 nights of unrest driven by outrage over Amini’s death.

At least 41 people have been killed as Iran has heavily deployed security forces against nationwide demonstrations sparked by the death.

Democratic Representative Katie Porter stated that Iran's morality police killed Amini, and now "the state is brutally cracking down on its own citizens protesting for their freedom. I stand in solidarity with the brave women and allies fighting for their rights."

Democratic Senator Bob Menendez considered that the Iranian regime's efforts to divert attention from what is happening at home by attacking Iraqi Kurdistan and organizing counter-demonstrations would not succeed.

Menendez, who chairs the Senate's Foreign Relations Committee, said the "brave women and men" are flocking to the streets to protest despite internet cuts and violent repression by the security forces.

Several Republicans expressed their support for the protesters. However, most took advantage of the development to attack the US administration and its ongoing efforts to return to the 2015 nuclear agreement with Tehran.

Senator Tom Cotton told Fox News on Sunday that if "President Biden actually wanted to support the brave protesters in Iran, he would abandon his efforts to resurrect the nuclear deal that would give billions of dollars to a dictatorial regime with leaders who still chant, ‘death to America’."

Cotton accused the Biden administration of failing to support Iranian protesters for the same reason "Barack Obama did in the summer of 2009 during the Green Revolution protests: he is standing idly by (…) as he's trying to pursue this reckless nuclear deal."

Meanwhile, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan responded to the accusations, denying that negotiations with Iran on its nuclear program will impact the administration's willingness and vehemence in "speaking out about what is happening on the streets of Iran."

During an interview with CBS, Sullivan asserted that the administration "has in fact taken tangible steps to sanction those morality police who caused the death of Mahsa Amini."

"We've taken steps to make it easier for Iranians to be able to get access to the internet and access to communications technologies that will allow them to talk to one another and to talk to the world. So, from our perspective, we will do all we can to support the brave people, the brave women of Iran," he explained.

Sullivan said the goal of the negotiations was to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, stressing: "We are determined to succeed in that effort."

However, this was not enough for the critics, who are keen on ensuring the administration does not lift sanctions imposed on Iran.

In their latest attempts, Republicans presented a bill preventing the administration from lifting sanctions on Iran until the Secretary of State certifies to Congress that Tehran did not support any attempts or activities to kill current or former US citizens or officials or any Iranians living in the United States.

Senator Joni Ernst introduced the bill, noting that it is "hard to fathom that, after countless attacks on Americans, and multiple confirmed plots against US officials, the Biden administration continues to cozy up to Iran in hopes of a mythical, so-called nuclear deal."



Mexico’s President Amused by Trump’s Order to Rename the Gulf of Mexico

 Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum delivers a speech at the National Palace, in Mexico City, Mexico January 21, 2025. (Reuters)
Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum delivers a speech at the National Palace, in Mexico City, Mexico January 21, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

Mexico’s President Amused by Trump’s Order to Rename the Gulf of Mexico

 Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum delivers a speech at the National Palace, in Mexico City, Mexico January 21, 2025. (Reuters)
Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum delivers a speech at the National Palace, in Mexico City, Mexico January 21, 2025. (Reuters)

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has an answer for US President Donald Trump about his idea of renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America”: he can call it whatever he wants on the American part of it.

Sheinbaum on Tuesday had been working through the raft of executive orders from Trump that relate to Mexico, emphasizing Mexico’s sovereignty and the need for dialogue, but when she got to the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico, she couldn’t help but laugh.

“He says that he will call it the Gulf of America on its continental shelf,” Sheinbaum said. “For us it is still the Gulf of Mexico, and for the entire world it is still the Gulf of Mexico.”

Trump said in his inaugural address Monday that he will change the name, an idea he first brought up earlier this month during a news conference.

“A short time from now, we are going to be changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America,” he said. Hours later he signed an Executive Order to do it.

Sheinbaum projected on a large screen at her daily press briefing Trump’s order called “Restoring Names that Honor American Greatness.”

The order says that within 30 days, the US secretary of the interior will rename “the US Continental Shelf area bounded on the northeast, north and northwest by the States of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida and extending to the seaward boundary with Mexico and Cuba.”

Americans and Mexicans diverge on what to call another key body of water, the river that forms the border between Texas and the Mexican states of Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo Leon and Tamaulipas. Americans call it the Rio Grande; Mexicans call it the Rio Bravo.

The first time Trump mentioned the idea of changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico, Sheinbaum responded sarcastically suggesting instead renaming North America as “América Mexicana” or “Mexican America.”

This time, she just briefly insisted: “For us and for the entire world it will continue to be called the Gulf of Mexico.”