What Caused Holes in Sue the T. Rex’s Jawbone? Scientists Are Stumped

The mounted fossil of a Tyrannosaurus rex known as Sue is pictured at the Field Museum in Chicago, Illinois, US, in this undated handout image obtained by Reuters on September 30, 2022. (Lucy Hewett, Field Museum/Handout via Reuters)
The mounted fossil of a Tyrannosaurus rex known as Sue is pictured at the Field Museum in Chicago, Illinois, US, in this undated handout image obtained by Reuters on September 30, 2022. (Lucy Hewett, Field Museum/Handout via Reuters)
TT
20

What Caused Holes in Sue the T. Rex’s Jawbone? Scientists Are Stumped

The mounted fossil of a Tyrannosaurus rex known as Sue is pictured at the Field Museum in Chicago, Illinois, US, in this undated handout image obtained by Reuters on September 30, 2022. (Lucy Hewett, Field Museum/Handout via Reuters)
The mounted fossil of a Tyrannosaurus rex known as Sue is pictured at the Field Museum in Chicago, Illinois, US, in this undated handout image obtained by Reuters on September 30, 2022. (Lucy Hewett, Field Museum/Handout via Reuters)

Sue, the biggest and best-preserved Tyrannosaurus rex ever unearthed, no doubt was a fearsome beast when this predator prowled what is now South Dakota about 67 million years ago at the twilight of the age of dinosaurs.

But even this huge dinosaur, whose fossils are displayed at the Field Museum in Chicago, was not invulnerable. A prime example of this is the series of circular holes in Sue's jawbone that continue to baffle scientists. New research seeking an explanation for these holes has managed to rule out one major hypothesis, though the answer remains elusive.

Researchers said a close examination of the eight holes - some the diameter of a golf ball - on the back half of Sue's left lower jawbone, or mandible, determined that they were not caused by a type of microbial infection as some experts had proposed.

The holes were found to differ from bone damage caused by such an infection, said Bruce Rothschild, a medical doctor and research associate at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, lead author of the study published this week in the journal Cretaceous Research.

Sue, measuring 40-1/2 feet long (12.3 meters), represents one of the world's best-known dinosaur fossils. Tyrannosaurus was one of the largest land predators ever, inhabiting western North America at the end of the Cretaceous Period.

Field Museum paleontologist and study co-author Jingmai O'Connor noted that about 15% of all known T. rex specimens have holes similar to Sue's.

The researchers explored whether the holes had been caused by an infection involving microbes called protozoans. One common protozoan disease known to occur in birds, which evolved from feathered dinosaurs, as well as in people is called trichomoniasis, caused by a parasitic protozoan. Trichomoniasis in people, though not birds, is a sexually transmitted disease.

O'Connor noted that one falcon diagnosed with trichomoniasis had shown damage in its jaw, but it differed from Sue's holes.

The bone around Sue's holes showed signs of healing, indicating that whatever caused them did not kill the animal. Similarities were observed between Sue's healing and the healed breaks in other fossilized bones as well as healing bone seen around holes made in the skulls of ancient Inca people in Peru.

The cause of Sue's holes remains a puzzle.

Rothschild proposed the possibility of claw damage during mating, or as he put it: "mounting from back or top with claws striking the posterior mandible." Sue has a feminine name - honoring the woman who discovered the fossils in 1990 - but the dinosaur's sex is unknown.

"I honestly have no clue what formed them," O'Connor said. "I really do not think they are bite marks or claw marks."

"A pathology that commonly affected T. rex individuals, that caused large holes to open up in the jawbone but only in the back of the jawbone, but didn't kill the T. rex because the holes started to heal, at least in Sue - it's weird," O'Connor added. "So many hypotheses have been put forth only to be shot done. It's a good paleontology mystery - my favorite."

The holes were not the only examples of damage endured by Sue, a dinosaur that lived about 33 years.

"Sue was quite old when it died and it shows numerous injuries and pathologies," O'Connor said. "It had gout in its hands. It had fallen on its right side, busting its ribs - they healed, though. It had torn a ligament in the right arm - healing. It had a horrible bone infection in its left leg. It had arthritis in its tail. It would not have been a happy camper the last year of its life."



Humanoid Robot Says Not Aiming to 'Replace Human Artists'

A man faces the realistic artist" robot "Ai-Da" using artificial intelligence at a stand during the ITU AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva. Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP/File
A man faces the realistic artist" robot "Ai-Da" using artificial intelligence at a stand during the ITU AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva. Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP/File
TT
20

Humanoid Robot Says Not Aiming to 'Replace Human Artists'

A man faces the realistic artist" robot "Ai-Da" using artificial intelligence at a stand during the ITU AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva. Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP/File
A man faces the realistic artist" robot "Ai-Da" using artificial intelligence at a stand during the ITU AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva. Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP/File

When successful artist Ai-Da unveiled a new portrait of King Charles this week, the humanoid robot described what inspired the layered and complex piece, and insisted it had no plans to "replace" humans.

The ultra-realistic robot, one of the most advanced in the world, is designed to resemble a human woman with an expressive, life-like face, large hazel eyes and brown hair cut in a bob.

The arms though are unmistakably robotic, with exposed metal, and can be swapped out depending on the art form it is practicing.

Late last year, Ai-Da's portrait of English mathematician Alan Turing became the first artwork by a humanoid robot to be sold at auction, fetching over $1 million, said AFP.

But as Ai-Da unveiled its latest creation -- an oil painting entitled "Algorithm King", conceived using artificial intelligence -- the humanoid insisted the work's importance could not be measured in money.

"The value of my artwork is to serve as a catalyst for discussions that explore ethical dimensions to new technologies," the robot told AFP at Britain's diplomatic mission in Geneva, where the new portrait of King Charles will be housed.

The idea, Ai-Da insisted in a slow, deliberate cadence, was to "foster critical thinking and encourage responsible innovation for more equitable and sustainable futures".

'Unique and creative'

Speaking on the sidelines of the United Nations' AI for Good summit, Ai-Da, who has done sketches, paintings and sculptures, detailed the methods and inspiration behind the work.

"When creating my art, I use a variety of AI algorithms," the robot said.

"I start with a basic idea or concept that I want to explore, and I think about the purpose of the art. What will it say?"

The humanoid pointed out that "King Charles has used his platform to raise awareness on environmental conservation and interfaith dialog. I have aimed this portrait to celebrate" that, it said, adding: "I hope King Charles will be appreciative of my efforts."

Aidan Meller, a specialist in modern and contemporary art, led the team that created Ai-Da in 2019 with artificial intelligence specialists at the universities of Oxford and Birmingham.

He told AFP that he had conceived the humanoid robot -- named after the world's first computer programmer Ada Lovelace -- as an ethical arts project, and not "to replace the painters".

Ai-Da agreed.

There is "no doubt that AI is changing our world, (including) the art world and forms of human creative expression", the robot acknowledged.

But "I do not believe AI or my artwork will replace human artists."

Instead, Ai-Da said, the aim was "to inspire viewers to think about how we use AI positively, while remaining conscious of its risks and limitations".

Asked if a painting made by a machine could really be considered art, the robot insisted: "My artwork is unique and creative."

"Whether humans decide it is art is an important and interesting point of conversation."