UK Would Resume Bilateral Ties with Sudan Only Under Civilian-Led Government

Protests demanding a civilian-led government in Sudan (AP)
Protests demanding a civilian-led government in Sudan (AP)
TT

UK Would Resume Bilateral Ties with Sudan Only Under Civilian-Led Government

Protests demanding a civilian-led government in Sudan (AP)
Protests demanding a civilian-led government in Sudan (AP)

Two British officials said there are significant differences between parties to the Sudanese conflict, stressing that dialogue must include all parties to resolve the current political crisis in the country.

The officials stressed that the UK expects the military side not to obstruct the political settlement, noting that the resumption of bilateral relations with London is tied to forming a civilian-led transitional government in Sudan.

UK Special Envoy for Sudan and South Sudan Robert Fairweather said it wasn't easy, but it is essential to listen to all parties and discuss establishing confidence and making progress.

Fairweather was on a three-day visit to Sudan, accompanied by the UK's envoy to the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea, Sarah Montgomery.

He highlighted significant differences between the Sudanese parties, and said the UK received some positive indications. However, he stressed that actions are more important than words.

The two British officials reiterated their country's support for dialogue between the parties to reach a settlement that leads to a political breakthrough, represented by the formation of a civilian-led transitional government.

During his visit to Sudan, the envoy met with the Chairman of the Transitional Sovereign Council, General Abdulfattah al-Burhan, Forces of Freedom and Change, and the National Consensus Forces, affiliated with the army.

Fairweather stressed the need for all to "demonstrate flexibility and compromise if real progress is to be made. Vital for Sudanese actors and coalitions to unite and deliver transition demanded by people of Sudan."

For his part, Burhan affirmed the need to reach a national consensus, expand the base of political participation, and return to the transitional path after the military component announced its withdrawal from the political process.

He expressed his confidence in the Trilateral Mechanism as a platform, calling on the UK and the international community to urge the parties to cooperate and achieve a political settlement.

The visit affirms London's support for a settlement that leads to a political breakthrough and the formation of a framework for a comprehensive civilian transitional government in Sudan.

Sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that British officials held a meeting with the Trilateral Mechanism, consisting of UNITAMS, the African Union, and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), where civil and military forces held talks.

Britain participates in the quadripartite mechanism, which includes Saudi Arabia, the US, and the UAE, that seeks to bring the positions closer between the army and the civilian forces to reach a political settlement to resolve the crisis.

UNITMAS Chief Volker Perthes stressed the inevitable need for political dialogue and said the path requires an explicit agreement on the tasks of the transitional period and the distribution of roles and responsibilities among various players.

Perthes asserted that military leaders should not play political roles, noting that the Trilateral Mechanism will continue exerting efforts with its partners in the international community to reach a political agreement.

He said: "Almost all stakeholders, including notably the military, have expressed that they want the Trilateral Mechanism to play a role – either in bringing the different initiatives together, coming up with bridging proposals or eventually mediating an agreement with the military."



Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
TT

Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)

Baghdad has been preoccupied this week with serious possibilities that Israel may expand its war on Gaza and Lebanon by striking several targets in Iraq in retaliation to attacks by Iran-backed armed factions.

Concern has been high that Israel may attack government buildings, oil fields and strategic locations, not just the positions of the armed factions that have previously launched attacks against Israel, said sources close to the pro-Iran ruling Coordination Framework.

Media sources have spoken of government speculation that Iraq could come under “300 Israeli attacks”.

The fears in Iraq have been compounded by an Israeli complaint to the United Nations Security Council against seven armed factions and holding Baghdad responsible for the attacks they have carried out against it.

This prompted the government, through the foreign ministry, to send an official letter to the Security Council, UN Secretary-General, Arab League and Organization of Islamic Cooperation in response to the Israeli threats.

The ministry said on Saturday that Iraq is “the cornerstone of stability in the region and world and it is one of the countries that are most committed to the UN Charter.”

“The Zionist entity’s letter to the Security Council is part of a systematic policy aimed at creating claims and excuses in an attempt to expand the conflict in the region.”

It said Iraq has turned to the Security Council out of Iraq’s keenness on the international body carrying out its duty in maintaining international peace and security and the need to rein in the “Zionist aggression in Gaza and Lebanon.”

Moreover, it stressed that Iraq has been keen on exercising restraint when it comes to the use of its airspace to attack a neighboring country.

Israel has used Iraqi airspace to launch attacks against Iran in October.

Iraq underscored the importance of the international community stepping in to “stop this hostile behavior that is a flagrant violation of international law.”

It called for international efforts to stop the Israeli escalation in the region and ensure that international laws and treaties are respected to consolidate security and stability.

Meanwhile, a source close to the Coordination Framework said the main Shiite parties are taking the Israeli threats “very seriously”, urging Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's government to take “all the necessary measures to avert a potential Israeli strike.”

All leaders of armed factions, as well as Shiite leaders, have taken up alternative locations and are moving under great secrecy, confirming that they have changed the majority of their military positions, said the source.

It also dismissed claims that Israeli jets have overflown Iraq, saying nothing has been confirmed, but not ruling out the possibility, especially since US forces have control over Iraqi skies and Iraq is helpless against stopping these violations.

Iraq had submitted a formal complaint to the UN and Security Council over Israel’s use and violation of its airspace to attack Iran.

Analyst and former diplomat Ghazi Faisal said the pro-Iran armed factions have been gathering their forces in the Sinjar province, which is strategic for Iran’s arms deliveries and logistic support to Syria where attacks can be carried out against American forces and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

Sinjar is one of the most important strategic bases for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, he added.

Furthermore, he noted that the armed factions insist on continuing the war against Israel, rejecting government calls for calm and neutrality.

The government’s statements are aimed at delivering a message that it “is not directly responsible for the strategy of these factions,” which follow Iran’s policies.

Iraq has repeatedly said that it refuses for its territory to be used to attack another country, but some observers believe that it may allow Iran to do so should Israel strike.