Int’l Coalition Forces Cordon Tanf Base, Amid Divisions in Ranks of Jaysh Maghawir Al-Thawra

A photo distributed by the international coalition to celebrate the appointment of Colonel Farid al-Qassem as the new leader of the Jaysh Maghawir al-Thawra armed faction at al-Tanf base on Sunday, October 2, 2022. (International Coalition)
A photo distributed by the international coalition to celebrate the appointment of Colonel Farid al-Qassem as the new leader of the Jaysh Maghawir al-Thawra armed faction at al-Tanf base on Sunday, October 2, 2022. (International Coalition)
TT

Int’l Coalition Forces Cordon Tanf Base, Amid Divisions in Ranks of Jaysh Maghawir Al-Thawra

A photo distributed by the international coalition to celebrate the appointment of Colonel Farid al-Qassem as the new leader of the Jaysh Maghawir al-Thawra armed faction at al-Tanf base on Sunday, October 2, 2022. (International Coalition)
A photo distributed by the international coalition to celebrate the appointment of Colonel Farid al-Qassem as the new leader of the Jaysh Maghawir al-Thawra armed faction at al-Tanf base on Sunday, October 2, 2022. (International Coalition)

The international coalition forces cordoned off Tanf base in the 55-kilometer deconfliction zone and ordered, via loudspeakers, all fighters, except their forces in the base, to leave without weapons, amid coalition aircraft flights over the area, a war monitor reported on Monday.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights had previously revealed that international coalition forces announced Farid Hossam al-Qassem as the new head of Jaysh Maghawir al-Thawra.

This comes amid a dispute among the faction members in the zone over assigning Qassem to his new post.

Members of Jaysh Maghawir al-Thawra, some leaders who rejected Qassem’s appointment and some civil protestors are present at the base.

The international coalition announced on Sunday Qassem’s appointment, replacing Colonel Muhanad al-Tallaa.

However, the faction’s military council immediately announced its rejection of the decision, stressing in a statement that it rejects any foreign intervention in the appointment of its revolutionary leadership.

It further made it clear that Qassem does not belong to Jaysh Maghawir al-Thawra faction.

The SOHR reported Monday that protests continue near Tanf base against the coalition’s appointment decision.

Its sources reported several protests in the past few days staged by dozens of civilians and combatants of the armed faction near the coalition’s base that is stationed near the Syria-Jordan-Iraq border triangle in the 55-kilometer deconfliction zone in the Syrian desert.

On the other hand, a large number of civilians and faction members supported the coalition’s decision and rejected reappointing Tallaa, whom they accused of “being involved in many corruption cases.”

On September 29, SOHR sources reported that dozens of residents gathered near Tanf base to protest the coalition’s decision and called on its command to appoint any other officer from the faction instead of Qassem.

On September 27, the war monitor quoted sources as saying that an international Coalition warplane flew over Tanf garrison and broke the sound barrier to disperse the protestors as they approached the base, where US and other Western forces are deployed.



Hossam Hassan’s Messages of Support for Palestine Stir Anger in Israel

Egypt national team coach Hossam Hassan during a press conference ahead of the match against Argentina (Reuters)
Egypt national team coach Hossam Hassan during a press conference ahead of the match against Argentina (Reuters)
TT

Hossam Hassan’s Messages of Support for Palestine Stir Anger in Israel

Egypt national team coach Hossam Hassan during a press conference ahead of the match against Argentina (Reuters)
Egypt national team coach Hossam Hassan during a press conference ahead of the match against Argentina (Reuters)

A new message from Egypt national team coach Hossam Hassan has sparked widespread debate on social media after he once again voiced support for Gaza, just days after dedicating Egypt’s historic qualification for the Round of 16 at the 2026 FIFA World Cup to the Palestinian people and raising the Palestinian flag - moves that angered Israel.

The latest remarks drew criticism in Israel and prompted assessments from experts interviewed by Asharq Al-Awsat. Some argued that politics and sports should remain separate, while stressing that such a position does not mean ignoring Israel’s actions in Gaza.

Others said such separation is unrealistic in sporting, arguing that these messages anger Israel while encouraging oppressed peoples, foremost among them the people of Gaza.

Speaking at a late-night press conference in the United States on Monday, ahead of Egypt’s match against Argentina, Hassan said: “If there is anyone in this world who does not feel the suffering of the Palestinian people, they have lost an essential part of their humanity, regardless of their nationality, religion, or background - whether Arab, European, American, or from anywhere else.”

He added: “We all sympathize when an animal is harmed. Human rights organizations and animal welfare groups respond, and the entire world condemns it. So what should the response be when thousands of people are killed every day?”

“We live in safe homes, sheltered by air conditioning in the summer and warmth in the winter. We have food and water whenever we want. Meanwhile, children and families there live in tents through the summer heat and winter cold, without shelter to protect them. Children have nothing to eat, and families face illness, hunger, and fear every day.”

Hassan urged everyone “who holds authority or influence to imagine themselves or their children spending just one day in the conditions endured by the people of Gaza and Palestine, sitting out in the open under the scorching sun or in the rain and cold, without shelter or security.”

Calling the situation “a stain on the conscience of the entire world,” Hassan appealed for support for Palestine, saying: “Please, let your message be that the Palestinian people deserve to live.”

Israel’s Yedioth Ahronoth accused Hassan of using a global media platform to renew his support for the Palestinians. The Times of Israel noted that he had once again reaffirmed his position, while Israel Hayom reported Israeli anger over the Egyptian coach’s continued expressions of solidarity with Palestine.

By contrast, Hassan’s remarks were widely praised across Arab social media. Palestinian Facebook user Mahmoud Al-Amoudi wrote: “For the millionth time, thank you, Captain Hossam Hassan. You are truly a human being. You are Arab, you are Muslim, you are our brother.”

Israeli Army Radio correspondent Jacky Hugi described the comments as a natural extension of Hassan’s previous actions, including raising the Palestinian flag after Egypt’s victory over Australia in the previous round.

Hassan had earlier dedicated Egypt’s historic qualification for the World Cup Round of 16, following its victory over Australia, to the Palestinian people and expressed solidarity with them. Images of him waving the Palestinian flag on the pitch circulated widely, prompting Israeli social media users to attack him and call for support for Argentina.

Despite the widespread praise for Hassan’s remarks, political sociologist Dr. Said Sadek argued that every occasion has its own protocol. He said Hassan had gone to the World Cup to represent Egypt and, if victorious, should raise the Egyptian flag in accordance with protocol.

If he wished to express his personal views, Sadek said, he was entitled to hold a separate press conference to do so.

Sadek asked why, by the same logic, Hassan had not raised the Lebanese or Sudanese flags, since people there are also suffering. He argued that raising the Palestinian flag and dedicating the victory to Palestinians were populist gestures that generated publicity and social media momentum, noting that Hassan continued speaking about Gaza after receiving such widespread attention.

Sadek stressed that his reservations about Hassan’s actions “do not mean agreeing with Israel’s position toward the Palestinian people,” adding that Israel should be condemned for what it has done in Gaza. He also reiterated his opposition to bringing politics into football, as he believes former Egyptian footballer Mohamed Aboutrika previously did.

By contrast, Israeli affairs analyst Nizar Nazzal noted that politics cannot be separated from any sphere, particularly as sports have become a platform for competing narratives. He said Israel seeks to silence critical voices at every event, and that attempts to separate politics from sports ultimately work in Israel’s favor, while proving virtually impossible to enforce in stadiums regardless of calls to do so.

According to Nazzal, Israel would continue criticizing any narrative that exposes its actions in Gaza, whether voiced by Hassan or anyone else. As Egypt’s coach commands millions of followers, he added, Hassan’s messages are bound to reach a vast audience, as demonstrated on social media.

He continued that Israeli criticism was unlikely to extend beyond the media, unlike the response in May, when Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz publicly attacked Lamine Yamal after the Barcelona star raised the Palestinian flag, accusing him of incitement and promoting hatred.


Ali al-Taher: The Ridge That Stalled the First Attempt at an Israeli Withdrawal from S. Lebanon

A photograph taken from the southern city of Nabatieh shows smoke rising from the site of an Israeli airstrike on the village of Nabatieh al-Fawqa on July 5, 2026. (AFP)
A photograph taken from the southern city of Nabatieh shows smoke rising from the site of an Israeli airstrike on the village of Nabatieh al-Fawqa on July 5, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Ali al-Taher: The Ridge That Stalled the First Attempt at an Israeli Withdrawal from S. Lebanon

A photograph taken from the southern city of Nabatieh shows smoke rising from the site of an Israeli airstrike on the village of Nabatieh al-Fawqa on July 5, 2026. (AFP)
A photograph taken from the southern city of Nabatieh shows smoke rising from the site of an Israeli airstrike on the village of Nabatieh al-Fawqa on July 5, 2026. (AFP)

The circulation of footage showing an Israeli flag raised Tuesday on one of the peaks of the Ali al-Taher Heights has again drawn attention to one of South Lebanon’s most strategic locations.

Overlooking the city of Nabatieh and the town of Kfar Tebnit, the mountain has emerged as a key geostrategic flashpoint. Israel had claimed that it seized the area on June 26, but Hezbollah refuted it, saying its fighters still hold it.

While the images prompted speculation that Israel had secured the site, military experts say reaching one point on the ridge does not amount to controlling the entire mountain, which has become a central sticking point in negotiations because of its exceptional strategic value.

The developments coincided with renewed military activity across southern Lebanon. Israeli drones dropped several stun grenades over the town of Hadatha in the Bint Jbeil district, while Israeli warplanes flew at low altitude over the eastern Bekaa Valley as far as Baalbek.

In the western sector, Lebanon’s National News Agency reported that Israeli forces conducted armored patrols through several villages, accompanied by heavy gunfire, as Israeli drones continued flying over Beirut’s southern suburbs.

Raising a flag does not mean control

Retired Brig. Gen. Bassam Yassine told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Ali al-Taher Heights is one of South Lebanon’s most important geographical and military strongholds because they dominate Nabatieh and its surroundings.

Stretching from Kfar Tebnit to Kfar Remman, the ridge overlooks the city and the roads leading to it while facing Beaufort Castle directly.

Yassine noted that Israel maintained positions at Ali al-Taher before its 2000 withdrawal from South Lebanon, operating three military outposts on Ali al-Taher, Dabsha, and Jabal al-Tahra.

Even if Israeli forces reach the mountain’s edge, he argued, they cannot claim full control. “A drone reaching one location or a flag being raised at a specific point does not mean military control or occupation of the entire area,” he said.

Addressing Israeli claims that Hezbollah has an underground facility beneath Ali al-Taher, Yassine said that, if it exists, it would explain why the area has been targeted by hundreds of airstrikes over the past two years.

He noted that Israel believes Hezbollah fighters remain inside the facility and is therefore seeking to seize it through ground operations, something that cannot be accomplished from the air alone.

Smoke billows following an Israeli strike on Ali al-Taher and Dabsha in southern Lebanon. (NNA)

Retired Brig. Gen. Fadi Daoud described Ali al-Taher as a supporting position for Beaufort Castle, with the two sites providing each other with mutual surveillance and fire support.

He stressed that Ali al-Taher is not a single summit but part of Jabal al-Tahra, which includes three principal peaks — Ali al-Taher, Dabsha, and Rayat al-Taher — that form a single military and geographic complex.

The ridge overlooks Kfar Tebnit, Nabatieh, and parts of Kfar Remman.

While observation of Israeli settlements is primarily provided from the Beaufort and Bfour heights, Ali al-Taher protects and reinforces those positions.

The ridge that changed the negotiations

According to information obtained by Asharq Al-Awsat, early discussions on an Israeli withdrawal from the South proposed beginning with Kfar Tebnit and the Beaufort Castle area to push the forces away from Nabatieh.

Israel, however, insisted on first reaching the Ali al-Taher, turning the ridge into the negotiations’ main point of contention.

Contacts were held with the United States on a proposal under which the Lebanese Army would deploy in the area while Israeli forces withdrew beyond the Litani River. The proposal was also conveyed to Hezbollah through mediators.

The sources said Israel accepted it, but Hezbollah rejected an initial formula that called for the Lebanese Army to deploy without entering the reported underground facility.

The proposal collapsed, and negotiators instead shifted to a pilot withdrawal plan covering Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh, Froun, and Ghandouriyeh, leaving Ali al-Taher outside any agreement.

Located north of the Litani River between Kfar Tebnit and Nabatieh al-Fawqa at an elevation of about 600 meters (1,970 feet), Ali al-Taher was one of Israel’s principal fortified positions in the former occupied border zone until 2000.

During the latest war, Israeli forces advanced toward the ridge after capturing Beaufort Castle, opening two axes of advance toward Ali al-Taher ahead of advancing on Nabatieh.


Lebanon’s President: Israeli Attacks Undermine Efforts to End the War

This picture taken from a position in the Upper Galilee in northern Israel shows destroyed buildings in a Lebanese village along the Israel-Lebanon border, on July 1, 2026. (Photo by Jack GUEZ / AFP)
This picture taken from a position in the Upper Galilee in northern Israel shows destroyed buildings in a Lebanese village along the Israel-Lebanon border, on July 1, 2026. (Photo by Jack GUEZ / AFP)
TT

Lebanon’s President: Israeli Attacks Undermine Efforts to End the War

This picture taken from a position in the Upper Galilee in northern Israel shows destroyed buildings in a Lebanese village along the Israel-Lebanon border, on July 1, 2026. (Photo by Jack GUEZ / AFP)
This picture taken from a position in the Upper Galilee in northern Israel shows destroyed buildings in a Lebanese village along the Israel-Lebanon border, on July 1, 2026. (Photo by Jack GUEZ / AFP)

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said Israel’s continued attacks in southern Lebanon are undermining efforts to end the war and restore stability on both sides of the border, while stressing that the authority to negotiate rests exclusively with the Lebanese state.

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam likewise reaffirmed the need to consolidate the ceasefire and secure a full Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory as soon as possible.

Sixth round of talks next week?

Ministerial sources said the Lebanese presidency has not been officially notified of a new date for Lebanese-Israeli negotiations. They also denied reports that Aoun’s visit to the United States had been scheduled for July 21, telling Asharq Al-Awsat that the trip is expected to take place before the end of the month but that no official date has been communicated.

Their comments came after an Italian Foreign Ministry spokesperson announced Tuesday that the sixth round of Lebanon-Israel negotiations would be held in Rome on July 15-16. Diplomatic efforts continue on several fronts to overcome obstacles delaying the start of Israel’s withdrawal from the designated pilot zones.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said during a joint press conference in Jerusalem with German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul: “Less than two weeks ago, Israel, Lebanon, and the United States reached a historic framework agreement, and these talks are scheduled to continue next week in Rome.”

Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani welcomed the upcoming round, saying on X that Rome’s selection reflects Italy’s diplomatic role and commitment to promoting dialogue and regional stability.

Aoun calls for pressure on Israel

Aoun renewed his appeal to the US and other friendly countries to pressure Israel to respect the ceasefire. He also expressed sorrow over Monday’s Israeli strike on a vehicle in Nabatieh that killed four people, including the principal of a public school in the town of Nabatieh al-Fawqa.

He stressed that his decision to enter negotiations was driven by the goal of achieving stability, ending the war, and removing the occupation. While acknowledging that implementing the framework agreement would be a lengthy and difficult process, Aoun said Lebanon hopes to begin seeing parts of the agreement implemented soon.

“We have succeeded in curbing Israeli attacks and reducing their intensity, even if we have not yet achieved a complete end to the war,” he stated, adding that Lebanon had secured an Israeli acknowledgment that it has no territorial ambitions in Lebanon.

“No one will negotiate on Lebanon’s behalf”

Aoun accused some domestic opponents of deliberately misrepresenting the framework agreement and rejecting it regardless of official explanations affirming that Lebanon has not compromised its sovereignty or territorial rights.

“I will not, under any circumstances, accept anyone negotiating on Lebanon’s behalf,” he said. “Lebanon’s sovereignty requires an independent political decision. Our fundamental problem is with Israel, and we must resolve it ourselves.”

He added that one Lebanese faction, whose choices differ from those of the majority of Lebanese, remains under Iranian influence, seeks to act as an alternative to the state, and negotiates in its name.

Separately, Foreign Minister Youssef Raji said the government remains committed to placing all weapons under state authority.

He described the framework agreement with Israel as “the beginning of the beginning,” saying its greatest significance lies in establishing an independent Lebanese negotiating track separate from Iran’s, while accusing Tehran of continuing to interfere in Lebanon’s internal affairs.

Politically, the Kataeb Party backed swift implementation of the framework agreement, calling for all arms to be placed under state control to facilitate Israel’s withdrawal, the return of displaced residents, and reconstruction.

By contrast, Walid Jumblatt, former leader of the Progressive Socialist Party, criticized the agreement, calling it a unilateral arrangement imposed by Israel on Lebanese negotiators with limited legal and diplomatic expertise.

He argued that, unlike international treaties, the framework agreement has no explicit commitment to Israeli withdrawal.