Railway Project Between Egypt, Sudan Moves Forward

Passengers wait for their train near a damaged train carriage (File photo: Reuters)
Passengers wait for their train near a damaged train carriage (File photo: Reuters)
TT
20

Railway Project Between Egypt, Sudan Moves Forward

Passengers wait for their train near a damaged train carriage (File photo: Reuters)
Passengers wait for their train near a damaged train carriage (File photo: Reuters)

Egypt's President, Abdelfattah El-Sisi, on Sunday issued a decision approving a grant between Egypt, represented by the Ministry of International Cooperation, and the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development (KFAED), to fund a railway project between Egypt and Sudan.

A presidential decree, published in the official gazette, approved a 750,000-Kuwaiti dinar ($2.5 million) grant to contribute to conducting a technical, economic and environmental feasibility study for a rail line project, under a deal signed on April 7, 2022.

The deal came as part of the activities of the joint annual meetings of Arab financial institutions, held in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

According to the deal, the Kuwaiti Fund would contribute in making a feasibility study to determine the technical, economic and financial feasibility of the project, and study the environmental and social impact.

The Egyptian Ministry of International Cooperation had previously said the project comes as part of Egypt’s interest in reinforcing the cooperation between Cairo and Khartoum, along with achieving economic and social integration and unlocking the sustainable development potentials with the neighboring country.

In February, Egypt’s Transport Minister Kamel el Wazir announced that preliminary studies on the first railway line between Egypt and Sudan have been completed.

The first stage of the railway links Aswan to Abu Simbel in southern Egypt, at a length of 285 kilometers, and the second stage, which will reach Wadi Halfa in northern Sudan, is set to be 80 kilometers long.

The project was first proposed at a meeting of Arab transport ministers in Cairo in 2010.

However, it had only started to take effect when Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi visited Sudan in 2018.



Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
TT
20

Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 

The US military intervention alongside Israel in its war against Iran has sparked growing concern in Lebanon, mixing fear with uncertainty about what lies ahead, especially as the region awaits Iran’s response.

Lebanese citizens are questioning whether Iran will retaliate solely against Israel or also strike nearby US military bases. Some speculate that Iran might avoid targeting American bases in neighboring countries that have shown solidarity with Tehran, as maintaining these relationships could help Iran push for an end to the war and a return to US-Iranian dialogue.

Despite mounting regional tension, Hezbollah continues to avoid direct military involvement. This position aligns with the recent statements of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who affirmed that Hezbollah will not intervene.

While some interpreted Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem’s pledge of “full support to Iran in any way we deem appropriate” as a divergence, sources say the party is fully aligned with Berri.

Berri maintains that dialogue between Washington and Tehran is the only path to halting the conflict and addressing Iran’s nuclear file. His stance is echoed by Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and other political actors.

US envoy Thomas Barrack, currently stationed in Türkiye, reportedly discussed these matters with Lebanese officials and promised to return in three weeks, hoping for progress toward a ceasefire and the implementation of UN Resolution 1701, which calls for Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon and for weapons to be under the exclusive control of the Lebanese state.

According to sources, the US escalation has prompted behind-the-scenes consultations between Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and Lebanese state officials. These talks aim to evaluate the situation and ensure Lebanon remains out of the regional conflict.

Hezbollah remains firm in its decision not to engage militarily, refusing to offer Israel a pretext to expand the war into Lebanon. Despite internal solidarity with Iran, Hezbollah is keenly aware that joining the war would not shift the military balance, which now involves advanced weaponry beyond its capabilities.

The sources added that the party is also mindful of Lebanese Shiite public sentiment, which favors stability over another devastating war. Memories of past conflicts, including the toll of Hezbollah’s support for Gaza, linger. Fears of displacement and economic ruin are driving many in Beirut’s southern suburbs to sell their homes, often at steep losses.